Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 vs Apple M2 Max

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8cx Gen 3

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 Compute Platform is an ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates four big ARM Cortex-X1 performance cores (up to 3 GHz) and four smaller ARM Cortex-A78 with up to 2.4 GHz.

The Compute Platform also integrates a Snapdragon X62 5G modem with up to 10 Gbps download and 316 Mbps upload. The integrated WLAN modem supports Wi-Fi 6E (2x2) and the satellite positioning system supports BeiDou, Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, and SBAS. The integrated video engine supports H.264, H.265, and VP9 decoding in 4K 120fps.

The performance should be around 85% faster for the CPU and 60% faster for the GPU compared to the previous generation (Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2).

The chip is produced in the modern 5nm process at Samsung (5LPE) and designed for fanless laptops (7 to 9 Watt TDP range).

Apple M2 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Max

The Apple M2 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 12 CPU cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 49 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (32, 64, or 96 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 Bit memory controller (400 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The CPU performance should be quite similar to the M2 Pro as only the higher memory bandwidth and bigger L3 cache could make a difference for some workloads.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Max offers a 30-core GPU or a GPU with all 38 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Max), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Max is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. The power consumption of the CPU part is up to 36 Watt according to powermetrics. When fully loading the CPU and GPU cores, the chip uses up to 89 Watt and the CPU part is limited to 25 Watt.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3Apple M2 Max
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonApple Apple M2
CodenameCortex-X1 / A78
Clock2400 - 2995 MHz2424 - 3696 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache6 MB36 MB
L3 Cache8 MB48 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 812 / 12
TDP7 Watt79 Watt
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesFastConnect 6900 2x2 Wi-Fi, Adreno 690 GPUARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 690Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Apple M2
Apple M2 Max « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 compare2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Transistors67000 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD 8cx Gen 3
24.4 pt (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3534     avg: 3603     median: 3567 (3%)     max: 3709 Points
min: 14738     avg: 14753     median: 14752.5 (14%)     max: 14767 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 559     avg: 588     median: 598 (25%)     max: 608 Points
min: 1625     avg: 1644     median: 1643.5 (70%)     max: 1662 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 199     avg: 208.7     median: 205 (23%)     max: 222 Points
min: 451     avg: 455.5     median: 455.5 (51%)     max: 460 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 810     avg: 1105     median: 1248 (3%)     max: 1258 Points
min: 4044     avg: 4065     median: 4064.5 (10%)     max: 4085 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 723     avg: 749     median: 748.5 (5%)     max: 774 Points
min: 2074     avg: 2084     median: 2084 (13%)     max: 2094 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 119     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (36%)     max: 119.1 Points
min: 233     avg: 236     median: 236 (71%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.2 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2481 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
13940 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
305.3 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4046 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 16223     avg: 21572     median: 23989 (14%)     max: 24505 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3874     avg: 3912     median: 3915 (47%)     max: 3946 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
33.2 fps (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
146.9 fps (34%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.5     avg: 2.2     median: 2.5 (4%)     max: 2.68 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1153     avg: 1626     median: 1625.5 (21%)     max: 2098 Seconds
326 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1059     avg: 1246     median: 1080 (8%)     max: 1600 Seconds
333 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.011     avg: 1     median: 1 (22%)     max: 1.013 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3876 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
848 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7084     avg: 7306     median: 7333 (20%)     max: 7500 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18857 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2899     avg: 4704     median: 4704 (12%)     max: 6509 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9533     avg: 9637     median: 9637 (17%)     max: 9741 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2939 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
2692 Points (72%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 Max +
14863 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486     avg: 1588     median: 1588 (67%)     max: 1690 Points
min: 1965     avg: 1970     median: 1967 (83%)     max: 1978 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4457     avg: 5990     median: 5989.5 (11%)     max: 7522 Points
min: 15348     avg: 15388     median: 15373 (28%)     max: 15444 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 663     avg: 665     median: 665 (3%)     max: 667 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3749     avg: 3797     median: 3796.5 (12%)     max: 3844 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3460 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15240 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1913     avg: 1925     median: 1915 (2%)     max: 1946 ms
min: 430.2     avg: 437.2     median: 437.2 (1%)     max: 444.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
49893 Points (44%)
min: 76610     avg: 77676     median: 77676 (68%)     max: 78742 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 64.2     avg: 66.2     median: 67.2 (19%)     max: 67.2 Points
min: 258     avg: 259     median: 259 (74%)     max: 260 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 84.7     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (19%)     max: 96.2 Points
min: 402     avg: 404.5     median: 404.5 (84%)     max: 407 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 627     avg: 673     median: 672.5 (26%)     max: 718 Points
min: 1759     avg: 1835     median: 1834.5 (70%)     max: 1910 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.9     avg: 33.5     median: 35.7 (6%)     max: 37.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.7     avg: 33     median: 33 (6%)     max: 33.2 Watt
92%
1 M2 Max +
72.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.21     avg: 3.4     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.6 Watt
96%
1 M2 Max +
9.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.5     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (4%)     max: 3.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 22.1     avg: 22.7     median: 22.7 (17%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt
126%
1 M2 Max +
28.5 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Max → 246% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 00:03:00

#0 checking url part for id 14600 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14975 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719871379 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14600 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 14600 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14975 +0s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 14975 +0s ... 0.015s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.041s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)