Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G vs Intel Core i7-13705H

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8cx Gen 2 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G Compute Platform (or SD8cx Gen2, SC8180XP) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates a similar CPU part as the Snapdragon 855 (same cores but without the Prime Core feature) and is manufactured in 7nm at Samsung. The 4 Kryo 495 Gold cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture (for performance) and clocked at 3.15 GHz under load. The 4 Kryo 495 Silver cores are small ARM Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency and clocked at 1.8 GHz under load (most likely).

Compared to the predecessor, the Snapdragon 8cx, the Gen 2 offers higher clock speeds and an integrated 5G modem (X55 with Sub-6 GHz and mmWave support). Wi-Fi was also bumped up to Wi-Fi 6

The processor performance should be similar to a Intel Core i5 8th gen U-series (e.g. i5-8250U) according to Qualcomm. However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled Windows apps which are not that many (in mid 2019). 32 bit applications and games for AMD/Intel run in a rather slow emulation and 64 bit apps wont start at all (but an emulator should come in Windows in 2021).

The integrated Adreno 680 graphics card could also be a bit higher clocked.

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at TSMC in the modern 7 process. Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 8cx can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

Intel Core i7-13705H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13705H

The Intel Core i7-13705H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 5 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.7 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Similar to the i7-13700H but without vPro support and the 13705H uses a different package and socket.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i7-13705H should be similar to the old top model, the Core i9-12900HK. Therefore, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations. The performance should be identical to the Core i7-13700H.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5GIntel Core i7-13705H
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonIntel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G « 3.15 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Microsoft SQ1 compare3 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx compare2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3150 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz
L3 Cache2 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 814 / 20
8 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP7 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
FeaturesX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 680 GPUThread Director
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 680Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.2 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketFCBGA1792

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13705H
45.9 pt (64%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17855     avg: 18765     median: 18765 (17%)     max: 19675 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1869     avg: 1874     median: 1874 (80%)     max: 1879 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 723     avg: 728     median: 727.5 (81%)     max: 732 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6868     avg: 7199     median: 7198.5 (18%)     max: 7529 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2750     avg: 2869     median: 2868.5 (18%)     max: 2987 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 273     avg: 273.5     median: 273.5 (82%)     max: 274 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
31.6 Points (41%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10476 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
61674 Points (45%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1259 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
26.3 s (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 71884     avg: 75165     median: 75165 (43%)     max: 78446 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5924     avg: 6000     median: 5999.5 (72%)     max: 6075 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.9     avg: 20.1     median: 20.1 (35%)     max: 21.3 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.7 GB/s (33%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 307     avg: 322     median: 322 (4%)     max: 337 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 172     avg: 181     median: 181 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4305     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4571 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
680 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1975 Points (5%)
min: 23001     avg: 23214     median: 23213.5 (63%)     max: 23426 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28388     avg: 30035     median: 30035 (54%)     max: 31682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12967     avg: 13650     median: 13649.5 (58%)     max: 14332 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2566     avg: 2589     median: 2588 (70%)     max: 2613 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14067     avg: 14372     median: 14502 (57%)     max: 14547 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 793     avg: 797     median: 797 (34%)     max: 801 Points
min: 1791     avg: 1841     median: 1841 (78%)     max: 1891 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3088     avg: 3116     median: 3115.5 (6%)     max: 3143 Points
min: 14124     avg: 14323     median: 14322.5 (26%)     max: 14521 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2355 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7502 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1284 ms (2%)
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 501 (1%)     max: 505 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
32979 Points (29%)
min: 90773     avg: 91471     median: 91471 (80%)     max: 92169 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 264     avg: 267.5     median: 267.5 (77%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
132 Points (28%)
min: 299     avg: 303.5     median: 303.5 (63%)     max: 308 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1835     avg: 1851     median: 1851 (71%)     max: 1867 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
17 Watt (3%)
min: 108.8     avg: 118.6     median: 118.6 (20%)     max: 128.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
156.2 Watt (29%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.26     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 8.24 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.6 Watt (6%)
min: 13.5     avg: 14.1     median: 14.1 (16%)     max: 14.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 19.1     avg: 76.7     median: 76.7 (57%)     max: 134.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13705H → 412% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 20:45:09

#0 checking url part for id 13120 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14986 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719859509 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13120 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 13120 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14986 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 14986 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.046s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)