Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Intel Core i7-8500Y

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 7c Gen 2

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 Compute Platform (or SD7c Gen2) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates two fast Kryo 495 Gold cores (based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture) at up to 2.55 GHz and six small Kryo 495 Silver cores (ARM Cortex-A55) for power efficiency. Compared to the previous generation, the clock speeds were slightly increased.

According to Qualcomm, the Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 can offer up to 60% better productivity performance per watt in Windows 10 compared to Gemini Lake Refresh chips such as the Intel Celeron N4020 and, to a good extent, the Pentium Silver N5030.

The integrated X15 LTE modem supports Cat.12 download (600 MBit/s) and Cat.13 upload speeds (150 MBit/s). Furthermore, Wifi-5 and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the SoC. In addition to the Adreno 618 graphic card, the SoC also integrates a Hexagon 692 NPU.

The chip is produced in 8nm (compared to the more modern 7LPP process of the 8cx) and intended for the use in thin and light laptops without a fan.

Intel Core i7-8500Y

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8500Y is a very efficient dual-core SoC for tablets and passively cooled notebooks based on the Amber Lake generation and will be announced around August 2018. It is the fastest Amber Lake-Y CPU at the time of announcement and consists of two processor cores clocked at 1.5 - 4.2 GHz. Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. Compared to the Kaby Lake-Y predecessors (e.g. Core i7-7Y75), Amber Lake uses the same architecture produced in the improved 14nm+ FinFET process (no 14nm++) but offers higher clock speeds at an increased TDP rating.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake / Kaby Lake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical.

Performance

The performance of the Y series is highly depending on the cooling solution of the laptop / tablet and the TDP settings for sustained load. Therefore, the differences between a Core m3 and a i7 may be rather slim, if the thermals are very limited. The high Turbo clock speeds in Amber Lake should however lead to a very good single thread performance for short bursts.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 950 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Amber Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in the second generation 14 nm+ process with FinFET transistors. The typical TDP for the Amber Lake Y-series is specified at 5 Watts (previous generations were 4.5 Watt), and can be adjusted in both directions depending on the usage scenario.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2Intel Core i7-8500Y
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonIntel Amber Lake
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)Amber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 « 2.55 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Intel Core i5-10310Y compare1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y compare1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y « 1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y compare1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y compare1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y compare1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y compare1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2550 MHz1500 - 4200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
2 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2 / 4
TDP7 Watt5 Watt
Technology8 nm14 nm
FeaturesX15 LTE Modem, Adreno 618 GPUDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, vPro, TXT
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 618Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1000 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8500Y
24.6 pt (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
992 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
307 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
116.8 Points (13%)
min: 304     avg: 312     median: 312 (35%)     max: 320 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
347 Points (1%)
min: 584     avg: 588     median: 587.5 (1%)     max: 591 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 245     avg: 252.3     median: 246.5 (2%)     max: 271 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 126     avg: 129.8     median: 130.5 (39%)     max: 132 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (2%)
min: 2.45     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (8%)
min: 1.43     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
511 Points (3%)
min: 4898     avg: 5027     median: 5027 (30%)     max: 5156 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3053 Points (2%)
min: 8493     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (6%)     max: 8919 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
673 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.5 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1226 Points (2%)
2483 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
7703 MIPS (4%)
min: 7982     avg: 10709     median: 10709 (6%)     max: 13436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2046 MIPS (24%)
min: 3568     avg: 4368     median: 4367.5 (52%)     max: 5167 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
14.1 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
83.3 fps (19%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.6 fps (1%)
2.1 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.2 GB/s (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3620 Seconds (25%)
min: 1772     avg: 1966     median: 1965.5 (14%)     max: 2159 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2 sec (42%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
755 Points (2%)
min: 3015     avg: 3056     median: 3056 (7%)     max: 3097 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
22.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
657 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
8123 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1735     avg: 1926     median: 1926 (5%)     max: 2117 Points
min: 2942     avg: 3242     median: 3254.5 (9%)     max: 3516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25064     avg: 29890     median: 28391 (23%)     max: 36216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26981     avg: 31559     median: 31558.5 (26%)     max: 36136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 35630     avg: 38017     median: 38016.5 (32%)     max: 40403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2075 Points (5%)
min: 2260     avg: 2753     median: 2896 (7%)     max: 2959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
3433 Points (6%)
min: 3308     avg: 3993     median: 4201 (7%)     max: 4261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1047 Points (4%)
min: 1204     avg: 1292     median: 1240 (5%)     max: 1431 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 556     avg: 1047     median: 1046.5 (44%)     max: 1537 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1630     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (6%)     max: 5337 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
858 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1504 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1580 Points (16%)
min: 3910     avg: 4398     median: 4397.5 (44%)     max: 4885 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3667 Points (4%)
min: 6223     avg: 7224     median: 7224 (8%)     max: 8225 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5614 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3245 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1819     avg: 2904     median: 2904 (3%)     max: 3989 ms
min: 1281     avg: 1499     median: 1446 (2%)     max: 1822 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
20737 Points (18%)
min: 22283     avg: 24377     median: 24631.5 (22%)     max: 25962 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
95 Points (20%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
285 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8500Y → 229% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 01:34:47

#0 checking url part for id 13529 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10088 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720136087 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13529 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 13529 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10088 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 10088 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.056s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)