Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Intel Core i5-10210Y vs Intel Core i5-10310Y

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 7c Gen 2

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 Compute Platform (or SD7c Gen2) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It integrates two fast Kryo 495 Gold cores (based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture) at up to 2.55 GHz and six small Kryo 495 Silver cores (ARM Cortex-A55) for power efficiency. Compared to the previous generation, the clock speeds were slightly increased.

According to Qualcomm, the Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 can offer up to 60% better productivity performance per watt in Windows 10 compared to Gemini Lake Refresh chips such as the Intel Celeron N4020 and, to a good extent, the Pentium Silver N5030.

The integrated X15 LTE modem supports Cat.12 download (600 MBit/s) and Cat.13 upload speeds (150 MBit/s). Furthermore, Wifi-5 and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the SoC. In addition to the Adreno 618 graphic card, the SoC also integrates a Hexagon 692 NPU.

The chip is produced in 8nm (compared to the more modern 7LPP process of the 8cx) and intended for the use in thin and light laptops without a fan.

Intel Core i5-10210Y

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10210Y

The Intel Core i5-10210Y is a extremely power efficient quad-core SoC for small laptops and tablets based on the Comet Lake (CML-Y) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Amber Lake processors (e.g. Core i7-8500Y), the only difference are two additional cores in the top models (except i3-10110Y). The processor cores are clocked between 1 and 4 GHz (all 4 cores 2.7 GHz max). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i7-10510Y, the level 3 cache is reduced to 6 MB and the clock rates are lower. The similar Core i5-10310Y offers 100 MHz higher clock speed, but the minimal configurable TDP is 1 W higher.

More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 10210Y as of August 2023, it's realistic to expect the chip to be about half as fast as the Core i5-10210U (Comet Lake, 4 cores, 8 threads, up to 4.2 GHz) in multi-thread workloads. Those 4 cores of the 10210Y are slated to be very much constrained by the low TDP target leading to high DPC latencies no matter the day of the week and generally unresponsive system behaviour.

The integrated graphics adapter is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 615 and clock from 300 - 1050 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

The chip is now produced in the 14nm++ process (Amber Lake Y was 14nm+) but not 10nm like Ice Lake Y. The TDP is specified at 7 Watts but can be varied from 4.5 to 9 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). Set to 4.5 W TDP passive cooling should be possible.

Intel Core i5-10310Y

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10310Y

The Intel Core i5-10310Y is a extremely power efficient quad-core SoC for small laptops and tablets based on the Comet Lake (CML-Y) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Amber Lake processors (e.g. Core i7-8500Y), the only difference are two additional cores in the top models (except i3-10110Y). The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.1 GHz (all 4 cores 2.8 GHz max). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i7-10510Y, the level 3 cache is reduced to 6 MB and the clock rates are lower.

More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 10310Y as of August 2023, it's realistic to expect the chip to be about half as fast as the Core i5-10210U (Comet Lake, 4 cores, 8 threads, up to 4.2 GHz) in multi-thread workloads. Those 4 cores of the 10310Y are set to be very much constrained by the low TDP target leading to high DPC latencies and generally unresponsive system behaviour no matter the activity.

The integrated graphics adapter is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 615 and clock from 300 - 1050 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder.

The chip is now produced in the 14nm++ process (Amber Lake Y was 14nm+) but not 10nm like Ice Lake Y. The TDP is specified at 7 Watts but can be varied from 5.5 to 9 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations).

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2Intel Core i5-10210YIntel Core i5-10310Y
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonIntel Amber LakeIntel Amber Lake
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)Amber Lake-YAmber Lake-Y
Series: Amber Lake Amber Lake-Y
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 « 2.55 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Intel Core i5-10310Y1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y « 1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310Y « 1.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210Y1 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8500Y1.5 - 4.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110Y1 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8210Y1.6 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8200Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100Y1.3 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core m3-8100Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y1.1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2550 MHz1000 - 4000 MHz1100 - 4100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 8
2 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4 / 84 / 8
TDP7 Watt7 Watt7 Watt
Technology8 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesX15 LTE Modem, Adreno 618 GPUDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 618Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 615 (300 - 1050 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1377BGA1377

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
992 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
307 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
116.8 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
347 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
511 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3053 Points (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1226 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
7703 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2046 MIPS (24%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.6 fps (1%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3620 Seconds (25%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2 sec (42%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
755 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1735     avg: 1926     median: 1926 (5%)     max: 2117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
2075 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
3433 Points (6%)
6172 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1047 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 556     avg: 1047     median: 1046.5 (44%)     max: 1537 Points
738 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1630     avg: 3484     median: 3483.5 (6%)     max: 5337 Points
2735 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1580 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3667 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1819     avg: 2904     median: 2904 (3%)     max: 3989 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
20737 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
95 Points (20%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
285 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10210Y → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 22:07:23

#0 checking url part for id 13529 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11483 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11467 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719950843 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13529 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 13529 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11483 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 11483 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11467 +0s ... 0.017s

#12 got single benchmarks 11467 +0s ... 0.017s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.032s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.032s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)