Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 vs Intel Core i5-13400

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230

► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Plus MSM8230

The Qualcomm MSM8230 (Snapdragon S4 Plus series) is a ARM based high-end smartphone SoC in 2012. It contains two Krait (ARMv7) CPU cores at up to 1.2 GHz, a Adreno 305 GPU, a single channel LPDDR2 memory controller and radio elements.  The chip is produced in 28nm LP (low power process) at TSMC. Compared to the MSM8930, the 8230 lacks LTE.

The Krait cores offer a slightly better performance as the standard Cortex-A9 cores and are compatible to the NEON SIMD extensions.

Intel Core i5-13400

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13400

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a top modern and fast desktop processor and belongs to the current Raptor Lake series. The processor was introduced early 2023 and offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz. It reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo mode. As with Alder Lake-S, Raptor Lake-S is also based on a hybrid design that combines P and E cores. The Intel Core i5-13400 therefore offers 6 P-cores and 4 E-cores, which can process a total of up to 16 threads in parallel. The processor continues to be manufactured using the 10 nm production process (called "Intel 7"). The Intel Core i5-13400 does not have a freely selectable multiplier. The LGA 1700 socket introduced with the Alder Lake series serves as the basis. The Intel Core i5-13400 can be based on either a Raptor Lake or Alder Lake chip. Initially, however, Alder Lake chips will be supplied.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i5-12400, the IPC of the new Core i5-13400 has been increased slightly. Nevertheless, there are now also 4 e-cores, which support the processor in terms of multi-thread performance. This puts the Intel Core i5-13400 at the level of an Intel Core i5-12600K, which also offers a total of 16 threads.

Graphics unit

The Intel Core i5-13400 is a processor with an integrated graphics unit, but it is only suited for office use or very old and low demanding games.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13400 is 65 watts in PL1. Intel defines the PL2 limit at 148 watts. If the restrictions regarding power consumption are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value can be reached permanently. However, a high-quality and powerful cooling unit should be used for this.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230Intel Core i5-13400
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonIntel Raptor Lake-S
CodenameARMv7Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake-S
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
Intel Core i7-13700 compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400F compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13400 « 2.5 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock1200 MHz2500 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB0.1 MB
L2 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 210 / 16
Technology28 nm10 nm
FeaturesHSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FMIntel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 305Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (300 - 1550 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
L3 Cache20 MB
TDP65 Watt
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
$221 U.S.
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13400
42.9 pt (60%)
Intel Core i5-13400
42.9
max:
72.1 68%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15953 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1786 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
688 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6135 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2358 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
257 Points (77%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
27.4 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8721 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51095 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83214 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14142 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
452.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7979 Points (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
59510 MIPS (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5829 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
135.8 fps (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
311 fps (72%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
19.1 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
336 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
206 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13632 Points (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
427.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79573 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
23120 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 4020     avg: 4586     median: 4586 (4%)     max: 5152 Points
83302 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
4038 Points (3%)
82671 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
89999 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19608 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27135 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12948 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1795 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12107 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11801 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7683 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
42509 Points (47%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
457 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
454 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
536 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1320 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
1515 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
670 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1082 Points (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 183.5     avg: 194.6     median: 194.6 (7%)     max: 205.7 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.71     avg: 85.8     median: 85.8 (8%)     max: 133.9 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16231 ms (19%)
535 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1154     avg: 1812     median: 1811.5 (20%)     max: 2469 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1055     avg: 1261     median: 1125 (11%)     max: 1604 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
251 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
306 Points (64%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4202     avg: 4658     median: 4658 (11%)     max: 5114 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
2394 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14895 Points (35%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
236 Iter./s (7%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
5123 Iter./s (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 3723     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (1%)     max: 4865 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1877 Points (72%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
229 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
196.6 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
82.8 Watt (92%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13400 → 1329% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 27. 00:27:34

#0 checking url part for id 4062 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14996 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719440854 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4062 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 4062 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14996 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 14996 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.054s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)