Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 6550M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon RX 6550M

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is a mobile entry-level graphics card based on the Navi 24 chip (RDNA 2  architecture) manufactured in the modern 6nm process. It features 1024 cores (16 CUs - compute units) and 4 GB of fast GDDR6 graphics memory connected with a 64 Bit memory bus. The chip also includes 16 MB Infinity Cache. The game clock speed is specified at 2560 MHz. Compared to the RX 6500M, the 6550M offers an increased core clock (+17%) but the memory bus i cut in half (64 versus 128 Bit).

The performance should be slightly higher than an average RX 6500M, as long as the memory bandwidth reduction wont has a too big impact.

The Navi 24 chip is manufactured at TSMC in the modern 6nm process and should offer a good energy efficiency. The RX6550M is specified at a TDP of 50 - 80 Watt and therefore best suited for normal multimedia laptops.

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

The NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU or A4500 Mobile is a professional graphics card for mobile workstations. It is based on the GA104 Ampere chip and similar to the consumer GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU. It offers 5,888 graphics cores, 46 RT cores, 184 Tensor cores and up to 16 GB GDDR6 graphics memory with a 256 Bit memory bus. It supports PCIe 4.0 and will be available in different variants from 80 to 140 Watt (TGP) with different clock speeds (and performance). The GPU supports eDP 1.4b to connect the internal monitor and DisplayPort 1.4 and HDMI 2.1 for external connections.

There is no more Max-Q variant (formerly used for the low power variants) but every OEM can choose to implement Max-Q technologies (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).

The raw performance should be similar to the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop at the same TGP level. Both GPUs depend heavily on good cooling and a high TGP for good performance. At a similar power consumption level the RTX A4500 should be clearly faster than the old RTX A4000 and Quadro RTX 4000. The desktop variant of the A4500 however, is a lot faster.

The GA104 chip offers 6,144 FP32 ALUs of which half can also execute INT32 instructions (i.e. 3,072 INT32 ALUs). With Ampere all shaders could still execute FP32 or INT32 instructions. The raytracing and tensor cores on the chip were also improved according to Nvidia. The A4400 only uses 5,888 of the 6,144 CUDA cores. The Ampere chips also include an improved 5th generation video encoder (NVENC for H.264 and H.265) and a 7th generation decoder (for various formats now including AV1).

The GA104 chip is manufactured by Samsung in 8nm (8N), which is not quite able to keep up with the 7nm node at TSMC (e.g. used by AMD and also for the professional GA100 Ampere chip).

AMD Radeon RX 6550MNVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A Series
Radeon RX 6850M XT compare 2560 @ 2.46 GHz192 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6800M compare 2560 @ 2.12 - 2.3 GHz192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Radeon RX 6800S compare 2048 @ 1.8 - 1.98 GHz128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Radeon RX 6700M compare 2304 @ 2.3 GHz160 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Radeon RX 6650M XT compare 2048 @ 2.16 GHz128 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6650M compare 1792 @ 2.22 GHz128 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6600M compare 1792 @ 2.07 - 2.18 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon RX 6700S compare 1792 @ 1.7 - 1.89 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon PRO W6600M compare 1792 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon RX 6600S compare 1792 @ 1.88 GHz128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Radeon RX 6550M 1024 @ 2 - 2.56 GHz64 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6500M compare 1024 @ 2.19 GHz64 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6550S compare 1024 @ 2.17 GHz64 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Radeon RX 6450M compare 768 @ 2 - 2.22 GHz64 Bit @ 18000 MHz
Radeon RX 6300M compare 768 @ 1.51 GHz128 Bit @ 18000 MHz
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU compare 7424 256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU 5888 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 16000 MHz
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 1.22 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU compare 4096 @ 1.08 - 1.56 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 0.89 - 1.69 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU compare 2048 128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU compare 2048 64 Bit @ 14000 MHz
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Pipelines1024 - unified5888 - unified
Core Speed2000 - 2560 (Boost) MHz930 - 1500 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance11.6 TFLOPS FP16, 5.8 TFLOPS FP3218.5 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL2: 1 MB, L3: 16 MBL2: 4 MB
Memory Speed18000 MHz16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB16 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 2.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption80 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)140 Watt (80 - 140 Watt TGP)
Transistors5.4 Billion
Die Size 107 mm²
technology6 nm8 nm
FeaturesRadeon Media Engine (H.264, H.265, AV1 en- and decode)DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, PCIe 4.0 x16, 17.8 SP-FP TFLOPS Peak, 143 Tensor Performance Peak, up to 384 GB/s Memory Bandwidth, Resizable BAR, Support for Modern Standby
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement05.01.2023 30.03.2022
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.comnvdam.widen.net
CodenameGA104
TMUs184
ROPs96
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores127
Memory Bandwidth512 GB/s
PCIe4.0 x16
PredecessorRTX A4000 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
4955 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4546 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
12994 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14696 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
19932 Points (28%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
20506 Points (18%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
134.8 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
30568 Points (9%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
29898 Points (10%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
114.5 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
117.7 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
115.8 Watt (25%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
52 dB(A) (83%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon RX 6550M → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
62.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
34.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
28.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
17.3  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
61.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
52.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
44.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
43  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
29  fps
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
132.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
120.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
87.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
19.3  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
11.3  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
124.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
95.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
59.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
30.3  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
27.2  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
319  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
122.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
101.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
88.4  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
115  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
91  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
84  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
79  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
53.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
41.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
33  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
129.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
67.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
47.8  fps
QHD 2560x1440
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
31.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
137.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
127.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
112.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
103  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
277.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
171.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
83.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon RX 6550M:
49.4  fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon RX 6550M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

AMD Radeon RX 6550Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty62.845.934.728.617.3
Baldur's Gate 361.652.944.74329
F1 22132.5120.887.519.311.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands124.195.559.730.327.2
Strange Brigade319122.5101.188.4
Far Cry 5115918479
X-Plane 11.1153.741.233
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark129.367.447.831.2
Dota 2 Reborn137.1127.3112.3103
The Witcher 3277.2171.583.249.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
3
6

3
3
4

5
5
2
3
3
4
1




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:50:13

#0 checking url part for id 11558 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11318 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720079412 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11558 +0.019s ... 0.048s

#8 got single benchmarks 11558 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11318 +0s ... 0.052s

#10 got single benchmarks 11318 +0.003s ... 0.055s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.062s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.062s

#14 Got 43 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.066s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.066s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.066s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.069s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.069s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)