Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M470X vs Intel HD Graphics 500

AMD Radeon R9 M470X

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon R9 M470X is an upper mainstream mobile graphics card based on the familiar Bonaire chip. This 28 nm GPU uses all 896 shaders (14 Compute Units CU) and is based on the second generation of the GCN architecture (Graphics Core Next). The maximum memory size is 4 GB (GDDR5, 6000 MHz effective) and it is attached via 128-bit interface. Compared to the technologically identical predecessor card Radeon R9 M385X (1100 MHz), the R9 M470X could have a slightly higher clock.

Contrary to the R9 M300 series, the number of products within the R9 M400 series is currently limited to three (M485X, M470X and M470), but this will probably change with the launch of the new Polaris architecture in Q2 2016.

Sources: AMD (specs), AnandTech (Bonaire chip)

Intel HD Graphics 500

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 500

The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell), so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

AMD Radeon R9 M470XIntel HD Graphics 500
Gen. 9 Series
Radeon R9 M485X compare 2048 256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M470X 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M470 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Iris Pro Graphics P580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 compare 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 compare 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 compare 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 compare 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
ArchitectureGCN 2Gen. 9 Apollo Lake
Pipelines896 - unified12 - unified
Core Speed1100 MHz300 - 700 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed6000 MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 12 FL11_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
Transistors1.5 Billion
technology28 nm14 nm
FeaturesDirectCompute 5.0, OpenCLQuickSync
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement14.05.2016 01.09.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com
CodenameApollo Lake
CPU in HD Graphics 500GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Celeron J34554 x 1500 MHz, 10 W250 MHz750 MHz
Intel Celeron N34504 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron J33552 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz700 MHz
Intel Celeron N33502 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 250 MHz650 - 750 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 19294     avg: 24491     median: 24609 (3%)     max: 29579 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 12299     avg: 15195     median: 15085 (2%)     max: 18200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1932     avg: 2140     median: 2116 (2%)     max: 2306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 271     avg: 321.5     median: 307 (1%)     max: 401 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140     avg: 26074     median: 23761 (3%)     max: 34320 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
3DMark 06
min: 3393     avg: 3551     median: 3506 (5%)     max: 3753 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791     avg: 2888     median: 2894 (2%)     max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05     avg: 8.2     median: 8.1 (3%)     max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296     avg: 320     median: 324 (0%)     max: 336 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
23.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
24  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
28.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
20.2  fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
13.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
12.6  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
3  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!)  fps
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
12  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
5.5  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
HD Graphics 500:
1  fps
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!)  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!)  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
5.3 5.5 7.6 ~ 6 fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
18.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
17.2  fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
18.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
6.2  fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
4.9  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
8.7  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
15.9  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
15.5  fps
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
16.4  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.7  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 22.1 27.6 ~ 22 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
15.3 15.3 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
5.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
28.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.5  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
16  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
17.7  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
71.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
10  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
6.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
43.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.1  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
29.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
16.2 18 18.7 21 21.2 22.5 24.3 ~ 20 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 11 13 ~ 10 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 500:
2.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
21.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.3  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
19.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
9.1  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
14  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
13.6  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 500:
11.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
22.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 500:
11.1  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
40.1  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
54.5  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 500:
14.1  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
HD Graphics 500:
119  fps
high 1024x768
HD Graphics 500:
27.2  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
HD Graphics 500:
46  fps
Intel HD Graphics 500lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Valorant9.09
Hearthstone23.92411.2
League of Legends28.220.213.912.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider3
Strange Brigade
F1 201812
The Crew 25.5
Far Cry 511
World of Tanks enCore34.44.6
X-Plane 11.11644
Middle-earth: Shadow of War10
Team Fortress 22017.2
Dirt 4105.6
Rocket League18.16.2
Prey4.9
For Honor8.7
Overwatch15.9
Rainbow Six Siege15.5
World of Warships19.1
Metal Gear Solid V16.49.7
Dota 2 Reborn22155.65.1
Dirt Rally28.512.5
F1 20142216
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor17.7
Sims 471.613.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords106.3
GRID: Autosport43.819.1
GRID 229.314.4
BioShock Infinite201092.7
Tomb Raider21.59.3
Dead Space 319.39.1
Counter-Strike: GO1514
Diablo III1713.6
Anno 207027.812.2
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim11.27.6
Deus Ex Human Revolution22.911.1
Dirt 340.114.7
StarCraft 254.514.1
Trackmania Nations Forever11927.2
World of Warcraft46
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
33
5
2
24


7


3


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 05:41:32

#0 checking url part for id 7328 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719891692 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7328 +0.023s ... 0.077s

#8 got single benchmarks 7328 +0s ... 0.077s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.004s ... 0.08s

#10 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.027s ... 0.107s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.107s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.119s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.119s

#14 Got 98 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.127s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.127s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.129s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.142s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.142s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.144s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)