Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional high-end notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX7100 is based on the Polaris 10 or 20 chip and offers 2304 shaders like the older AMD Radeon RX 480  (Polaris 10) or newer Radeon RX 580 (Polaris 20). 

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 540X and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (unverified). The exact clock speeds of the mobile version are not published, the desktop version however, seems to feature similar clock speeds as the RX 540X.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

show full text
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100Qualcomm Adreno 750AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
Radeon Pro WX Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12Polaris 12
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines2304 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed1243 (Boost) MHz1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2017 25.10.2023 21.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Power Consumption50 Watt
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 11753     avg: 17517     median: 17891 (89%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 24304     avg: 30610     median: 31983 (96%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 16691     avg: 19116     median: 19516.5 (10%)     max: 20068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4331     avg: 4934     median: 5000 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 32     avg: 38     median: 38 (15%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 78.5     median: 83 (15%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 193.2     median: 199.5 (15%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 142.5     median: 151.5 (17%)     max: 162 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 239.5     median: 251.5 (5%)     max: 279 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 314.2     median: 327 (19%)     max: 363 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 189     avg: 495.3     median: 536.5 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (94%)     max: 784286 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
212.3 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 14070     median: 14200 (4%)     max: 14956 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 16184     median: 16286 (5%)     max: 16867 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.24     avg: 9.6     median: 9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 750:
60.1  fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
59.8 60 60 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 750:
59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 ~ 84 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
Adreno 750:
59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.9 39.9 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 750:
60 103 ~ 82 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 750lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact60.159.860
PUBG Mobile84606040
Dead Trigger 282
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3

1
1

1
2

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 16:29:48

#0 checking url part for id 7964 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9925 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720103388 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7964 +0.03s ... 0.06s

#9 got single benchmarks 7964 +0s ... 0.06s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.061s

#11 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.016s ... 0.077s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9925 +0s ... 0.077s

#13 got single benchmarks 9925 +0.003s ... 0.08s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.089s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.089s

#17 Got 33 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.097s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.097s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.097s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.099s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.099s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)