Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 730 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional high-end notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX7100 is based on the Polaris 10 or 20 chip and offers 2304 shaders like the older AMD Radeon RX 480  (Polaris 10) or newer Radeon RX 580 (Polaris 20). 

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Qualcomm Adreno 730

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 730

The Qualcomm Adreno 730 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2022 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 730 GPU offers a 30% improved performance thanks to 30% more ALUs over the Adreno 660, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 888 SoC.  Thanks to the new 4nm process, the power efficiency should also be improved.

The Adreno 730 supports Vulkan 1.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. 

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 540X and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (unverified). The exact clock speeds of the mobile version are not published, the desktop version however, seems to feature similar clock speeds as the RX 540X.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

show full text
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100Qualcomm Adreno 730AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
Radeon Pro WX Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12Polaris 12
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines2304 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed1243 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2017 30.11.2021 21.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Power Consumption50 Watt
CPU in Adreno 730GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1067     avg: 11770     median: 11974 (52%)     max: 15306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 15268     avg: 24195     median: 25285 (56%)     max: 27751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5983     avg: 10709     median: 10618 (53%)     max: 13386 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11082     avg: 17815     median: 18581 (56%)     max: 20955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6483     avg: 10241     median: 10384 (5%)     max: 11201 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1567     avg: 2534     median: 2549 (3%)     max: 2899 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 13     avg: 19.7     median: 20 (8%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 41     median: 41.5 (8%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 103.8     median: 101 (7%)     max: 138 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 50     avg: 84.6     median: 84 (9%)     max: 108 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 95     avg: 142.6     median: 136 (3%)     max: 189 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 126     avg: 208.6     median: 209 (12%)     max: 282 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 730
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 245     avg: 385.5     median: 381 (3%)     max: 468 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 293017     avg: 423760     median: 430076 (54%)     max: 479126 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 128.28     avg: 144.8     median: 144.8 (1%)     max: 161.33 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 5301     avg: 5418     median: 5418 (2%)     max: 5535 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 6354     avg: 6655     median: 6503 (2%)     max: 7108 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.52     avg: 9.5     median: 9.6 (4%)     max: 14.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 730 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 730:
110  fps
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 730:
55 91 ~ 73 fps
high
Adreno 730:
55  fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
55 60 ~ 58 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 730:
35  fps
med.
Adreno 730:
35 60 ~ 48 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 34 60 ~ 41 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 730:
30 43 56.9 60 60 60 60 60 60 63 72 90 94 99 103 188 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 730:
57 57 58 58 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
med.
Adreno 730:
51 58 59 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 59 fps
high
Adreno 730:
30 30 50 55 58 58 59 59 59 59 59.8 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 730:
30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 730:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 730:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Qualcomm Adreno 730lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift1106060
Call of Duty Mobile735558
Genshin Impact354841
Armajet75
PUBG Mobile59595740
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends45
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3

2


3
3

3
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 17:08:33

#0 checking url part for id 7964 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11105 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9925 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105713 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7964 +0.026s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 7964 +0s ... 0.08s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11105 +0s ... 0.08s

#11 got single benchmarks 11105 +0.034s ... 0.115s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9925 +0s ... 0.115s

#13 got single benchmarks 9925 +0.003s ... 0.118s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.129s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.129s

#17 Got 136 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 0.152s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.152s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.152s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.155s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.155s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.155s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)