Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 725 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional high-end notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX7100 is based on the Polaris 10 or 20 chip and offers 2304 shaders like the older AMD Radeon RX 480  (Polaris 10) or newer Radeon RX 580 (Polaris 20). 

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 540X and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (unverified). The exact clock speeds of the mobile version are not published, the desktop version however, seems to feature similar clock speeds as the RX 540X.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

show full text
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100Qualcomm Adreno 725AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
Radeon Pro WX Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12Polaris 12
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines2304 - unified512 - unified
Core Speed1243 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz1219 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement01.03.2017 30.11.2021 21.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Power Consumption50 Watt
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11837 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
20476 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
10274 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
14801 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
7701 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1968 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
16 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
34 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
35 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
137 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
232 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
359 fps (3%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (43%)     max: 360306 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
120.9 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
4056 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
5338 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
6.3 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 725:
56  fps
ultra
Adreno 725:
32  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 725:
54  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 725:
60  fps
high
Adreno 725:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 725:
40  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 725lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5632
Armajet54
PUBG Mobile606040
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 16:32:48

#0 checking url part for id 7964 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9925 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720103567 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7964 +0.027s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 7964 +0s ... 0.08s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0s ... 0.08s

#11 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.004s ... 0.084s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9925 +0s ... 0.084s

#13 got single benchmarks 9925 +0.003s ... 0.087s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.087s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.094s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.094s

#17 Got 6 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.095s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.095s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.096s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.097s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.097s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.097s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)