Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Qualcomm Adreno 720 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional high-end notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX7100 is based on the Polaris 10 or 20 chip and offers 2304 shaders like the older AMD Radeon RX 480  (Polaris 10) or newer Radeon RX 580 (Polaris 20). 

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

Qualcomm Adreno 720

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 720

The Adreno 720 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first used in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 was installed. The chip was introduced at the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, and the Adreno 720 also supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.3.

The GPU is capable of driving WFHD+ displays at up to 168 Hz and 4K displays at 60 Hz and offers support for HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It was announced early 2017 and is intended for Kaby-Lake based professional notebooks. The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

The WX4130 is based on the Polaris 11 or 12 chip and offers 640 shaders like the older AMD Radeon Pro 450 (entry level MacBook Pro 15 2016). However, the WX 4130 is clocked higher at 1053 versus 800 MHz. Therefore, the performance should be more similar to the Radeon Pro 455 (768 Shaders at 855 MHz). Due to the higher clock speed we suspect the newer Polaris 12 chip, that is manufactured in an improved 14nm (LPP+) process and allows the chip to be clocked higher. 

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

show full text
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100Qualcomm Adreno 720AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
Radeon Pro WX Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Radeon Pro WX 7100 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12Polaris
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines2304 - unified640 - unified
Core Speed1243 (Boost) MHz800 (Boost) MHz1053 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 MHz7000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.03.2017 17.11.2024 01.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.comwww.amd.com
CPU in Adreno 720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
5434 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1451 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
23 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
57 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
84 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
107 fps (6%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 720
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
174 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
236226 Points (29%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
60.7 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
29649 Points (30%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
37697 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
Adreno 720:
50.1  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 720:
57.7  fps
high
Adreno 720:
57.5  fps
ultra
Adreno 720:
38.7  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 720lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact50.1
PUBG Mobile57.757.538.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





1


2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 04. 17:12:12

#0 checking url part for id 7964 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12490 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7960 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105932 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7964 +0.027s ... 0.08s

#9 got single benchmarks 7964 +0s ... 0.08s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12490 +0s ... 0.08s

#11 got single benchmarks 12490 +0.005s ... 0.085s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7960 +0s ... 0.086s

#13 got single benchmarks 7960 +0s ... 0.086s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.091s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#17 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.092s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.092s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.092s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.093s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.093s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.093s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)