Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

The AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Mobile is a professional workstation graphics card for laptops. It is based on the consumer Radeon RX 540X and therefore uses the same Polaris 12 chip (unverified). The exact clock speeds of the mobile version are not published, the desktop version however, seems to feature similar clock speeds as the RX 540X.

The AMD Radeon Pro (formerly known as FirePro) is the counterpart to the Quadro series from Nvidia and offers certified drivers for professional 3D applications (CAD and DCC).

For more information on the features and specifications of the Polaris architecture, visit our in depth article here.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P4200

The Nvidia Quadro P4200 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. It is based on the GP104 chip (like the consumer GeForce GTX 1070 or 1080 for laptops) and features 2304 shader cores. The clock rate is not disclosed but the theoretical SP performance is rated at 8.9 TFLOPs (for the fast Max-P version) and therefore faster than the old Quadro P5000 but below the Quadro P5200 (see table below). The P4200 is equipped with 8 GB GDDR5 which leads to 224 GB7s peak bandwidth due to the 256 Bit memory bus. There are two variants available, a Max-P performance version and a Max-Q version tuned for efficiency (with lower clock speeds).

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P4200 is rated at 115 Watt TGP (max power consumption incl. memory) and therefore 15 Watt more than the Quadro P5000. The card is therefore best suited for large 17-inch notebooks.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P Series
Radeon Pro WX 7100 compare 2304 @ 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4150 compare 896 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 4130 compare 640 @ 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 7000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 3200 compare 640 @ 1.08 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro WX 2100 512 @ 1.22 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 compare 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
CodenamePolaris 12
ArchitecturePolarisPascal
Pipelines512 - unified2304 - unified
Core Speed1219 (Boost) MHz1215 - 1480 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed6000 MHz7132 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB8 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL VulkanDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption50 Watt115 Watt
technology14 nm16 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement21.03.2018 07.05.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 11280     avg: 12485     median: 12485 (22%)     max: 13690 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P4200 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 18:30:08

#0 checking url part for id 9925 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8814 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719851408 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:16:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9925 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#8 got single benchmarks 9925 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8814 +0s ... 0.051s

#10 got single benchmarks 8814 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.054s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.054s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.055s

#15 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)