Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Intel Celeron N5105

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

Intel Celeron N5105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5105

The Intel Celeron N5105 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive desktops and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5105 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N5105 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1005G1 and the Ryzen 3 3250U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (mobile and lower clocked N5100 6W). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSIntel Celeron N5105
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper Lake
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 / 4
TDP35 Watt10 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFP7/FP8BGA1338
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (450 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5105
21.7 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
2175 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
618 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
235 Points (26%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
826 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
368 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
108.1 Points (33%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
11153 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
3108 MIPS (37%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
2 fps (4%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
2940 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
1573 Seconds (11%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
1.2 sec (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
4394 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
3869 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
5498 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
1643 Points (7%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
653 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
2080 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
649 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2069 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
1582 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
96.2 Points (28%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
134.2 Points (28%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
531 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
22.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
16.2 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5105 → 38% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 19:25:58

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719854758 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.053s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)