Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Intel Celeron N5100 vs Intel Celeron N4505

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the N5100 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 20% slower than the N6000, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. In other words, this is a fairly slow processor that is unlikely to make anybody happy.

Power Consumption

Like most other N-class Intel processors, this Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation or second-generation [no exact data available] 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4505

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4505

The Intel Celeron N4505 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktops and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 2.9 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N4505 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is built with Intel's first-gen 10 nm process, just like Ice Lake family processors.

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 750 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4505 in our database is just as fast as AMD's dual-core Athlon Silver 3050e and Intel's previous-gen Celeron N4100, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. In other words, the Celeron is good for basic day-to-day activities but not much more than that, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This Celeron series SoC has a default TDP, also known as the long-term Power Limit, of 10 W, which is low enough to allow for passively cooled designs.

The N4505 is manufactured on the first-gen or the second-gen (no exact data available) 10 nm Intel process making for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSIntel Celeron N5100Intel Celeron N4505
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Jasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 / 42 / 2
TDP35 Watt6 Watt10 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP7/FP8BGA1338BGA1338
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4505
19.9 pt (28%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
min: 1114     avg: 1149     median: 1148.5 (1%)     max: 1183 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
min: 592     avg: 604     median: 603.5 (26%)     max: 615 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
min: 224     avg: 230     median: 230 (26%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
min: 431     avg: 441.5     median: 441.5 (1%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
min: 191     avg: 197.5     median: 197.5 (1%)     max: 204 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (32%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.46     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (3%)     max: 2.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.27     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3606     avg: 3622     median: 3621.5 (22%)     max: 3637 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6831     avg: 6861     median: 6860.5 (5%)     max: 6890 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
10063 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5294 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1120.44     avg: 1132     median: 1131.7 (13%)     max: 1143 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.481     avg: 35.8     median: 35.8 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
36.1 s (19%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1000     avg: 1062     median: 1061.5 (2%)     max: 1123 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
min: 5871     avg: 6004     median: 6003.5 (3%)     max: 6136 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 2971     avg: 3047     median: 3046.5 (36%)     max: 3122 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 13.5     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (5%)     max: 13.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
72.3 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.099     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.101 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.184     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.192 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.3 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
min: 5719     avg: 5742     median: 5741.5 (73%)     max: 5764 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
min: 2845     avg: 2899     median: 2899 (20%)     max: 2953 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
min: 1.162     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (26%)     max: 1.224 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3165     avg: 3214     median: 3214 (7%)     max: 3263 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.931     avg: 20.9     median: 20.9 (5%)     max: 21.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.275     avg: 45.7     median: 45.7 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 997     avg: 1003     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1009.94 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
6156 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (7%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
24182 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 24027     avg: 24121     median: 24121 (20%)     max: 24215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 25571     avg: 25808     median: 25808 (22%)     max: 26045 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
min: 2130     avg: 2131     median: 2130.5 (5%)     max: 2131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
min: 2979     avg: 2993     median: 2992.5 (5%)     max: 3006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
894 Points (4%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
631 Points (27%)
min: 647     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (28%)     max: 660 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
1788 Points (3%)
min: 1225     avg: 1232     median: 1232 (2%)     max: 1239 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 645     avg: 648     median: 648 (3%)     max: 651 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1205     avg: 1215     median: 1214.5 (4%)     max: 1224 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2942     avg: 2946     median: 2945.5 (29%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5078     avg: 5082     median: 5082 (6%)     max: 5086 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
min: 1578     avg: 1688     median: 1688 (2%)     max: 1798 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
353.4 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
24502 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
min: 79.3     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (23%)     max: 81.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
min: 113.3     avg: 114.2     median: 114.2 (24%)     max: 115 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
min: 442     avg: 444     median: 444 (17%)     max: 446 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
min: 18.3     avg: 19     median: 19 (3%)     max: 19.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
min: 15.4     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 25% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4505 → 23% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 20:26:03

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13113 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720031163 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13113 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#12 got single benchmarks 13113 +0.005s ... 0.032s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.07s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.07s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)