Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. The Celeron was announced in early 2021. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz (base clock speed) Boosting up to 2.9 GHz (single-core Boost) with 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache but no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology. This processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process to be not unlike the Ice Lake-U Core-series processors. The faster Celeron N5105 is notable for being more energy efficient (10 W TDP vs N5095's 15 W) yet featuring a faster iGPU model (24 EU UHD Graphics versus 16 EU UHD Graphics, with a higher clock rate to boot).

Architecture

Tremont architecture brings many improvements over the outgoing Goldmont architecture we know from Pentium N5030 and so many other N-class CPUs. According to Intel, the new architecture brings a 30% boost in single thread performance (+10% to +80% in SPECint and SPECfp depending on the test).

While the older N-class Celerons and Pentiums had to be content with up to 8 GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, Celeron N5095 is officially compatible with up to 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-2933 memory. Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) support is partially baked into the chip. The Celeron supports up to 8 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes, up to 14 USB 3.2 ports and up to two SATA III ports. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Jasper Lake processor package is larger compared to what Gemini Lake models had (35 x 24 mm vs. 25 x 24 mm). Please note that the Celeron gets soldered on to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database matches the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Even if the cooling system is great and the Power Limits are high as the sky, some slight architectural improvements together with the updated manufacturing node and higher-than-usual wattage of the Celeron are not nearly enough to let it compete with modern Core and Ryzen-series processors. It's a good option for basic day-to-day tasks, but anything beyond that will be a struggle.

Graphics

The CPU features the DirectX 12-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics iGPU running at 450 MHz to 750 MHz. The graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 displays with resolutions up to 4096x2160@60; it will happily decode HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. (You can still play such a video but it will be software-decoded rather than hardware-decoded which puts a hard limit on the watchable resolution as the CPU cores are not very fast here.)

This is not a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination. It is just as fast as an HD Graphics 515; it will let you play the least demanding titles (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided you are OK with 720p resolution and lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

Most N-class Celerons and Pentiums have a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). The Celeron N5095 on the other hand has a 15 Watt TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core i3/i5/i7 processors. This basically means that passively cooled designs are out of the question with this chip.

This Intel processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen or second-gen 10 nm process [no precise data available] for OK, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSIntel Celeron N5095AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Jasper LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 / 48 / 16
TDP35 Watt15 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP8BGA1338FP7/FP7r2/FP8
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
21.6 pt (30%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (26%)     max: 239 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (32%)     max: 109 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.29 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (12%)     max: 17278 Points
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 25.25 fps
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.5 GB/s (7%)
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
2936 Seconds (37%)
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.5 s (4%)
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.7 s (2%)
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1039 s (5%)
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (12%)     max: 4439 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (40%)     max: 48186 Points
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (27%)     max: 659 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (9%)     max: 7968 Points
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (80%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (27%)     max: 96.2 Points
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (26%)     max: 127.2 Points
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (19%)     max: 495 Points
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
4.9 Watt (3%)
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 37% n=22

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 108% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 19:59:16

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720029555 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.007s ... 0.034s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#12 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.029s ... 0.067s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.075s ... 0.143s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)