Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a powerful Phoenix family APU that saw the light of day in H1 2023. Its 8 cores are powered by the Zen 4 architecture and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. 4.0 GHz is the base clock speed and the highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.2 GHz.

The 7940HS introduces Ryzen AI which is AMD's answer to Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is set to give applications such as DaVinci Resolve and Photoshop quite a bit of generative AI magic.

More importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

The 7940HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600, including ECC-enabled memory). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7940HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-12900HK and also, somewhat disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY is among the fastest laptops built around the 7940HS that we know of. It can be about 15% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding most video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1, but more importantly it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 7940HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSIntel Celeron N4500AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Jasper LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
2 / 28 / 16
TDP35 Watt6 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP8BGA1338FP7/FP7r2/FP8
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7940HS
46.2 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 104     avg: 106     median: 106 (74%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 824     avg: 912     median: 937.5 (17%)     max: 972 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
709 Points (1%)
min: 15556     avg: 16952     median: 16985 (16%)     max: 18131 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
452 Points (19%)
min: 1733     avg: 1787     median: 1791 (76%)     max: 1832 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
188 Points (21%)
min: 680     avg: 701     median: 702 (78%)     max: 714 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
332 Points (1%)
min: 6277     avg: 6635     median: 6640 (16%)     max: 7111 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
171 Points (1%)
min: 2470     avg: 2687     median: 2663 (17%)     max: 2848 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
82 Points (25%)
min: 277     avg: 283.7     median: 284 (86%)     max: 288 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
1445%
1 R9 7940HS +
min: 29.8     avg: 30.3     median: 30.3 (39%)     max: 30.88 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
min: 3.34     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (85%)     max: 3.46 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7798     avg: 7881     median: 7880.5 (48%)     max: 7963 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 47982     avg: 48914     median: 48913.5 (35%)     max: 49845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
1246%
1 R9 7940HS +
min: 84721     avg: 86625     median: 86625 (60%)     max: 88529 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
min: 14300     avg: 14516     median: 14515.5 (18%)     max: 14731 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 66.801     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (1%)     max: 98.222 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 2.648     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.698 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 7439     avg: 7465     median: 7464.5 (12%)     max: 7490 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 66408     avg: 70832     median: 70707 (41%)     max: 73434 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 6417     avg: 6643     median: 6642 (79%)     max: 6776 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
1213%
1 R9 7940HS +
min: 140.8     avg: 145.8     median: 145.8 (51%)     max: 150.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 292.5     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (69%)     max: 304.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 20.1     avg: 21.1     median: 20.9 (37%)     max: 22.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
1383%
1 R9 7940HS +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
1193%
1 R9 7940HS +
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
1359%
1 R9 7940HS +
min: 14.8     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
min: 287     avg: 306.9     median: 305 (4%)     max: 331 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 182     avg: 190.4     median: 188.5 (1%)     max: 202 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.4159     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4467 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
min: 14891     avg: 15553     median: 15689 (33%)     max: 15851 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 7.058     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (2%)     max: 7.442 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 17.513     avg: 18     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.402 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 529.929     avg: 531     median: 531.4 (2%)     max: 532.8 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 74246     avg: 80834     median: 80476.5 (70%)     max: 86583 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
1507 Points (4%)
min: 16799     avg: 22458     median: 22575 (61%)     max: 25006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79935     avg: 88670     median: 89772 (73%)     max: 96559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 79450     avg: 88483     median: 89602 (73%)     max: 96418 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 85305     avg: 91108     median: 92030 (78%)     max: 96047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
1521 Points (4%)
min: 13400     avg: 19703     median: 21112 (53%)     max: 21353 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
2017 Points (4%)
min: 24034     avg: 28329     median: 28504 (51%)     max: 30876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
504 Points (2%)
min: 10388     avg: 11211     median: 11210 (47%)     max: 12212 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
457 Points (12%)
min: 2426     avg: 2618     median: 2630 (71%)     max: 2746 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
662 Points (3%)
min: 9899     avg: 12185     median: 12249 (48%)     max: 13470 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1823     avg: 1982     median: 1994.5 (84%)     max: 2032 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 11207     avg: 11870     median: 11837.5 (21%)     max: 12500 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1764     avg: 1874     median: 1906 (8%)     max: 1918 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11232     avg: 11567     median: 11454 (36%)     max: 12127 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7410     avg: 7856     median: 7904 (79%)     max: 8253 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 45905     avg: 46966     median: 46270 (51%)     max: 48723 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 481     avg: 497.2     median: 499 (1%)     max: 515 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
24838 Points (22%)
89067 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
91.2 Points (26%)
min: 234     avg: 261.2     median: 263 (76%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 302     avg: 319.9     median: 317 (66%)     max: 349 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
min: 1674     avg: 1784     median: 1792 (69%)     max: 1861 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 70     avg: 103.1     median: 105.2 (18%)     max: 130.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 73     avg: 107.5     median: 110.4 (20%)     max: 134 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
min: 4.81     avg: 13.3     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 20.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
5.5 Watt (6%)
min: 9.82     avg: 15.9     median: 15.6 (17%)     max: 21.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 21.9     avg: 26.5     median: 25.5 (19%)     max: 33.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 25% n=23

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS → 110% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 18:58:15

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14946 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720025895 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.007s ... 0.028s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14946 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#12 got single benchmarks 14946 +0.019s ... 0.051s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.076s ... 0.127s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.127s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)