Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Intel Celeron N4500 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7840HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 3.8 (base) up to 5.1 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 7 7840HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R7 PRO 7840HS is only slightly below the fastest model, the R9 PRO 7940HS, as the clock speed difference is only minimal (e.g. -100 MHz / 2% slower single core boost). Therefore, the CPU should also perform slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7840HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W TDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fast RDNA 3 graphics adapter (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured on the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HSIntel Celeron N4500AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)Jasper LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB1.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
2 / 28 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP35 Watt6 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP8BGA1338FP7/FP8
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7840HS
44.4 pt (62%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103.4     avg: 103.7     median: 103.7 (72%)     max: 104 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 852     avg: 882     median: 881.5 (16%)     max: 911 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
709 Points (1%)
min: 14240     avg: 15052     median: 15051.5 (14%)     max: 15863 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
452 Points (19%)
min: 1691     avg: 1733     median: 1732.5 (74%)     max: 1774 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
188 Points (21%)
min: 651     avg: 672     median: 672 (75%)     max: 693 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
332 Points (1%)
min: 5327     avg: 5781     median: 5781 (14%)     max: 6235 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
171 Points (1%)
min: 2361     avg: 2440     median: 2440 (15%)     max: 2519 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
82 Points (25%)
min: 262     avg: 269     median: 269 (81%)     max: 276 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 62497     avg: 66442     median: 66442 (38%)     max: 70387 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 6493     avg: 6496     median: 6495.5 (78%)     max: 6498 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 18.1     avg: 19     median: 19 (33%)     max: 19.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
min: 325     avg: 327     median: 327 (4%)     max: 329 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 201     avg: 203     median: 203 (1%)     max: 205 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 0.44     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4487 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
14772 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79794 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
1507 Points (4%)
min: 17015     avg: 20787     median: 20787 (56%)     max: 24559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
2017 Points (4%)
min: 26669     avg: 27465     median: 27464.5 (49%)     max: 28260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
504 Points (2%)
min: 10679     avg: 10990     median: 10990 (46%)     max: 11301 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
457 Points (12%)
min: 2419     avg: 2546     median: 2581 (69%)     max: 2638 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
662 Points (3%)
min: 10518     avg: 12078     median: 12457 (49%)     max: 13259 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 1822     avg: 1888     median: 1887.5 (80%)     max: 1953 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 10034     avg: 11037     median: 11036.5 (20%)     max: 12039 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
539 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
24838 Points (22%)
89380 Points (78%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
91.2 Points (26%)
min: 222     avg: 242     median: 242 (70%)     max: 262 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 311     avg: 363     median: 363 (76%)     max: 415 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
min: 1574     avg: 1620     median: 1620 (62%)     max: 1666 Points
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 76.6     avg: 83     median: 83 (14%)     max: 89.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 85.9     avg: 86.8     median: 86.8 (16%)     max: 87.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
min: 5.01     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (3%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
5.5 Watt (6%)
min: 5.11     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (7%)     max: 7.44 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
27.5 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 26% n=22

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS → 105% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 19:06:19

#0 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15054 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720026379 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15054 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 15054 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.082s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.082s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)