Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7840HX

The AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX is a high-end notebook processorfrom the Dragon Range series with 12 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. The CPU uses the current Zen 4 architecture for the 12 cores and clocks these from 2.9 GHz (base clock) up to 5.1 GHz (single-core boost). The CPU offers 12 MB L2 cache and 64 MB L3 cache (i.e. a total of 76 MB cache). The 7840X consists of three chiplets, two CCD clusters with a maximum of 8 CPU cores in 5nm (71mm²) and one IO die in 6nm (122mm²) which are all manufactured at TSMC.

The performance of the Ryzen 9 should be significantly faster than the old Ryzen 9 6980HX (top model Rembrandt H, 8 cores, max 5 GHz). This is achieved by the additional cores, higher clock rate and improved architecture. Compared to the one year older Ryzen 9 7845HX, the 7840HX is clocked 100 MHz lower.

The chip also integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB 4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPUs and SSDs), a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller and a small AMD Radeon 610M graphics card (2CUs, 400 - 2200 MHz).

The R9 7840HX is specified with 55 watts TDP and can be configured from 45 to 75 watts (cTDP).

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-7500 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7945HX3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Dragon Range series. It offers 16 cores based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (32 threads). The cores clock from 2.3 (base) up to 5.4 GHz (single core boost). Compared to the similar R9 7945HX, the 7945HX3D offers an additional 64 MB 3D V-Cache on one CCD-Cluster. This helps in some workloads that can use the additional fast cache (e.g. some games). The guaranteed base clock however was reduced from 2.5 to 2.3 GHz.

The performance of the R9 7945HX3D is similar to the R9 7945HX in workloads that wont make use of the bigger L3 cache. Most games however can use the additional memory. AMD e.g. was advertising the HX3D with 4% to 53% higher performance in 1080p high settings.

The Dragon Range series still uses a chiplet design with two CCD-clusters (each with 8 possible cores) in 5nm and an IO-die (including the memory controller and the Radeon 610M iGPU) in 6nm. The chip integrates 4x USB 3.2 Gen2 (10 Gbps) ports (no USB4), 28 PCIe 5.0 lanes (for GPU and SSDs) and a dual-channel DDR5-5200 memory controller.

The R9 7945HX3D is rated at a TDP of 55 Watt and can be configured up to 75 Watt (cTDP).

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7840HXAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
CodenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Strix Point-HX (Zen 5)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX « 2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D « 2.3 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX2.4 - 5.2 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX3 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
Clock2900 - 5100 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz2300 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB1 MB
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB
L3 Cache64 MB36 MB128 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
12 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x AMD Zen 5c
16 / 32
16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt54 Watt55 Watt
Transistors9900 Million
Technology5 nm4 nm5 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C89 °C
SocketFL1FP8FL1
FeaturesDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7945HX3D
57 pt (79%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
115 Points (80%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1772 Points (33%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
32782 Points (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1935 Points (82%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
755 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
13033 Points (32%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5600 Points (35%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
311 Points (94%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
61.9 Points (81%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.7 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8478 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
70414 Points (51%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
249.9 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
51122 Points (81%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
136201 MIPS (78%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7573 MIPS (91%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
36.4 fps (64%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.8 GB/s (66%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
23.4 GB/s (61%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
150 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
95 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
29707 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38826 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14131 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2916 Points (78%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
16957 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2133 Points (90%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
19875 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
421.3 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
97066 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
328 Points (94%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
480 Points (100%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2086 Points (80%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
157.2 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
187.3 Watt (34%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
28.9 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
17.2 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
29.9 Points per Watt (22%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 30. 10:52:20

#0 checking url part for id 17468 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15073 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719737540 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17468 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 17468 +0s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 17543 +0s ... 0.009s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15073 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#12 got single benchmarks 15073 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.037s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.037s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)