Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Intel Core i5-10200H

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 7730U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the second "Barcelo" refresh in early 2023 and offers the same specifications as the old Ryzen 7 5825U. The CPU integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in 7nm at TSMC. In comparison to the similar Ryzen 7 7730U, the PRO variant is aimed at business use and supports additional manageability and security features.

The Zen 3 microarchitecture offers significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2 but falls behind the current Zen 4-based CPUs (e.g., 7040HS series).

Performance

The average 7730U in our database performs similarly to the Ryzen 7 5825U, Ryzen 7 6800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, and also the Core i7-1360P concerning multi-thread benchmark scores.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs operating at up to 2000 MHz. The dual-channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy-efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, a 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB on the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watts (compared to the 5825U, which was specified between 10 and 25W).

Intel Core i5-10200H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10200H

The Intel Core i5-10200H is a fast quad-core processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 4.1 GHz  and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10200H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster (and later released) Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz).

Performance

The performance is only minimal better than the Core i5-9300H thanks to the support for faster DDR4-2933 RAM. This means, the CPU is well suited for demanding tasks, although the faster versions offer a significantly higher Turbo Boost clock speed for faster single core execution. 

Power consumption

This 10th gen Comet Lake processor has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to reduce somewhat, 35 W being the lower limit. Doing so will result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, this CPU is too power-hungry to be used as the base of a passively cooled laptop.

Intel Core i5-10200H is built with an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730UIntel Core i5-10200H
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameBarcelo-U RefreshComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U compare2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M compare2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1440
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, HT, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7730U
37.7 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10200H
30.1 pt (42%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
82.8 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
357 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10095 Points (9%)
5372 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1441 Points (61%)
1089 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
562 Points (62%)
419 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3967 Points (10%)
2082 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1756 Points (11%)
842 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
229 Points (69%)
171.6 Points (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.6 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (67%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6108 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33735 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
369.1 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5274 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 42735     avg: 45924     median: 45924 (26%)     max: 49113 MIPS
21148 MIPS (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5218     avg: 5269     median: 5269 (63%)     max: 5320 MIPS
4497 MIPS (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
95 fps (33%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
221 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.5     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (21%)     max: 12.6 fps
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 523     avg: 528     median: 528 (7%)     max: 533 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 298     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
515 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.543     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.553 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8758 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
456.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7418     avg: 10822     median: 10821.5 (29%)     max: 14225 Points
6233 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
51050 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12097     avg: 14052     median: 14052 (36%)     max: 16007 Points
7729 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20193     avg: 20887     median: 20887 (37%)     max: 21581 Points
10760 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4961     avg: 5989     median: 5988.5 (25%)     max: 7016 Points
3613 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1889     avg: 1895     median: 1894.5 (51%)     max: 1900 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 5685     avg: 6336     median: 6336 (25%)     max: 6987 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1416     avg: 1438     median: 1437.5 (61%)     max: 1459 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1094     median: 1094 (46%)     max: 1095 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5972     avg: 6560     median: 6559.5 (12%)     max: 7147 Points
min: 3564     avg: 3845     median: 3845 (7%)     max: 4126 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
648 ms (1%)
882 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
71022 Points (62%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
254 Points (53%)
187.3 Points (39%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1207 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.2 Watt (8%)
99.5 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
9.1 Watt (10%)
4.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
77 Points per Watt (57%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10200H → 68% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 00:03:00

#0 checking url part for id 16350 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12747 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720044180 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16350 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 16350 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12747 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 12747 +0.005s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.055s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)