Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a high-end desktop processor from the Raphael series with 8 Zen 4 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), allowing it to handle up to 16 threads simultaneously. After its announcement in January 2023 at CES in Las Vegas, it was launched in April 2023. Following the launch of the two top models, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, the third model was introduced, which offers significantly more gaming performance with the 3D V-Cache.

The CPU cores have a base clock of 4.2 GHz and can be boosted up to 5 GHz (single-core turbo). The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features a CCD with 8 cores, which includes the fast 3D V-Cache. This differs significantly from the two Ryzen 9 models, as they have two CCDs, but only one of them can utilize the 3D V-Cache.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is consistently good, although its multi-threaded performance suffers a bit due to the eight native compute cores. However, the real strength of the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D lies in gaming performance, where it excels. In tests, we see consistently high gaming performance, even surpassing that of an Intel Core i9-13900K.

In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D aligns with the other two models featuring 3D V-Cache, making the 8-core processor extremely power-efficient. In numbers, this means that the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D is specified with a TDP of up to 120 watts. The PPT (Package Power Tracking) is also rated up to 162 watts. For comparison, an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is specified with 170 watts (TDP) or 230 watts (PPT).

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X3D

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D is an 8-core desktop processor with a large level 3 cache (3DV cache) that is aimed mostly for increased gaming performance. It offers 8 Zen 3 based cores clocked at 3.4 - 4.5 GHz and therefore a bit slower than the 3.4 - 4.7 GHz of the R7 5800X. The power consumption of both chips is rated at 105 Watt (TDP) and the efficiency compared to Alder Lake desktop CPUs is rather good.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)AMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Vermeer (Zen3)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen3)
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 compare3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D « 4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X compare3.7 - 4.8 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D « 3.4 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
Clock4200 - 5000 MHz3400 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache0.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache0 MB4 MB
L3 Cache96 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP162 Watt105 Watt
Transistors6570 Million
Technology5 nm7 nm
Die Size1x 71 mm² (CCD) + 121 mm² (I/O) mm2
max. Temp.89 °C90 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)AM4 (1331)
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7800X3D
48.3 pt (67%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X3D
42.7 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16688     avg: 17387     median: 17387 (16%)     max: 18086 Points
14317 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1713     avg: 1767     median: 1766.5 (75%)     max: 1820 Points
1452 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 663     avg: 686     median: 686 (76%)     max: 709 Points
566 Points (63%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6488     avg: 6805     median: 6804.5 (17%)     max: 7121 Points
5479 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2783     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (18%)     max: 2974 Points
2413 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 272     avg: 281.5     median: 281.5 (85%)     max: 291 Points
241 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.5 Points (44%)
27.2 Points (35%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (85%)
2.8 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8026 Points (48%)
6008 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
51950 Points (38%)
42010 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
94035 Points (65%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14485 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
62.7 s (1%)
92.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16585 Points (26%)
14431 Points (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 75558     avg: 80313     median: 80312.5 (46%)     max: 85067 MIPS
69518 MIPS (40%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7412     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (94%)     max: 8235 MIPS
6799 MIPS (81%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
169.3 fps (59%)
138.3 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
344 fps (79%)
292 fps (67%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 22.1     avg: 23.3     median: 23.3 (41%)     max: 24.4 fps
19.1 fps (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.3 GB/s (40%)
13.8 GB/s (36%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 266     avg: 282.5     median: 282.5 (4%)     max: 299 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 178     median: 178 (1%)     max: 187 Seconds
212.6 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4152     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4479 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16892 Points (36%)
14479 Points (31%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.1 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.3 s (1%)
17.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.6 s (1%)
385.5 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97391 Points (85%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30767     avg: 32947     median: 32947 (89%)     max: 35127 Points
27236 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
89617 Points (73%)
84919 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
89287 Points (72%)
85531 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
91846 Points (77%)
86170 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25510 Points (65%)
22127 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 30333     avg: 31839     median: 31839 (57%)     max: 33345 Points
28938 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11975     avg: 13037     median: 13036.5 (55%)     max: 14098 Points
11809 Points (50%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2634 Points (71%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14288 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1934     median: 1920 (81%)     max: 2027 Points
1622 Points (68%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12073     avg: 13013     median: 12715 (23%)     max: 14252 Points
10856 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1938 Points (8%)
1526 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13888 Points (44%)
10836 Points (34%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9097 Points (91%)
7187 Points (72%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
54840 Points (60%)
43687 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 487     avg: 504     median: 503.5 (1%)     max: 520 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
282 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (74%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2216 Points (85%)
1770 Points (68%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
218 Watt (38%)
226 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207 Watt (38%)
209 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121.6 Watt (80%)
102 Watt (67%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
14.4 Points per Watt (11%)
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D → 87% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 17:10:08

#0 checking url part for id 15064 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14390 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105808 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15064 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 15064 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14390 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 14390 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.073s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)