Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i5-13500

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core desktop processor with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), which allows it to process 16 threads simultaneously. With its launch on 08.10.2020, it is the fastest 8-core processor from AMD. The second fastest 8-core processor will be the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT, followed by the more economical AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, also with 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Ryzen 7 5800X clocks with a base clock of 3.8 GHz and reaches up to 4.7 GHz on one core in turbo mode. When all 8 cores are utilized, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, achieves up to 4.5 GHz.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The CCX structure has changed somewhat compared to Zen2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8-CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity-Fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4.000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5800X in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-10900K and also the Core i7-12700F, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

In games, AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X can convince with its significantly improved IPC and even put Intel in its place. With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, gamers are well prepared for the future as simultaneous streaming is no problem with the new Ryzen 7 5800X. Semi-professional content creators, who need even more power, can choose a Ryzen 9 5900X or the Ryzen 9 5950X on the shelf.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. This applies as long as the CPU runs at stock clock speeds.

Ryzen 7 5800X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process; as rumors have it, the I/O die is manufactured separately on the 12 nm Global Foundries process.

Intel Core i5-13500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core i5-13500 ist ein schneller und sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,8 GHz im Turbo. Die mit Alder-Lake eingeführte hybride CPU-Architektur kommt auch bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zum Einsatz. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500 bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 mehr Kerne, womit eine höhere Gesamtleistung erzielt werden kann. In Summe kann der Intel Core i5-13500 bis zu 20 Threads parallel verarbeiten. Die Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) bieten hierzu Hyperthreading, was den energieeffizienten Kernen (E-Cores) vorenthalten wird.

Performance

Aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physikalischen Recheneinheiten bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 spürbar mehr Leistung. Beide Prozessoren verfügen über 6 P-Kerne, wenngleich nur der Intel Core i5-13500 zusätzlich mit 8 E-Kernen bestückt ist.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12600K bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500 beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 154 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 steigt der Energiebedarf etwas an.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5800XIntel Core i5-13500
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Raptor Lake-S
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Raptor Lake
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X « 3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 « 2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare2.5 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4700 MHz2500 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache32 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1614 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP105 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
Die Size2 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.intel.de
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X
44.8 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
42.6 pt (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15241     avg: 15476     median: 15476 (14%)     max: 15711 Points
14573 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1554     avg: 1575     median: 1574.5 (67%)     max: 1595 Points
1780 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624     avg: 625     median: 624.5 (69%)     max: 625 Points
685 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6068     avg: 6075     median: 6074.5 (15%)     max: 6081 Points
5633 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2601     avg: 2609     median: 2608.5 (16%)     max: 2616 Points
2405 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 265     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (80%)     max: 266 Points
256 Points (77%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.3 Points (38%)
28.4 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6835 Points (41%)
8875 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
45548 Points (33%)
49300 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83426 Points (58%)
79625 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13039 Points (16%)
14282 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
86.1 s (1%)
100.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15604 Points (25%)
7704 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 69921     avg: 72114     median: 72113.5 (41%)     max: 74306 MIPS
55528 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6843     avg: 6907     median: 6906.5 (83%)     max: 6970 MIPS
5887 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
152 fps (53%)
134.6 fps (47%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
339 fps (78%)
306 fps (71%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.8     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.8 fps
16.3 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15 GB/s (39%)
12 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 331     avg: 336     median: 336 (4%)     max: 341 Seconds
399 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 196.8     avg: 196.9     median: 196.9 (1%)     max: 197 Seconds
223 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4509     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15873 Points (34%)
14875 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.8 s (1%)
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
365.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
86050 Points (75%)
69725 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23381     avg: 23704     median: 23703.5 (64%)     max: 24026 Points
18026 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
94127 Points (76%)
84456 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
94179 Points (76%)
83392 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96702 Points (81%)
81778 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22992 Points (58%)
17891 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29163     avg: 30051     median: 30050.5 (54%)     max: 30938 Points
26263 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11599     avg: 11652     median: 11652 (49%)     max: 11705 Points
9655 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2483 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
10348 Points (41%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1665     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (71%)     max: 1701 Points
1805 Points (76%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10093     avg: 10724     median: 10723.5 (19%)     max: 11354 Points
10322 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
1749 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11246 Points (35%)
10213 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7333 Points (73%)
7379 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44131 Points (48%)
39094 Points (43%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 558     avg: 576     median: 575.5 (1%)     max: 593 ms
519 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
245 Points (70%)
254 Points (73%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 296     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 307 Points
266 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1541 Points (59%)
1549 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
242.3 Watt (42%)
98.7 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
220.7 Watt (40%)
121 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.9 Points per Watt (9%)
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 95% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 06:43:50

#0 checking url part for id 12783 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720068230 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12783 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12783 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.074s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)