Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs Intel Core i5-10400F

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core desktop processor with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), which allows it to process 16 threads simultaneously. With its launch on 08.10.2020, it is the fastest 8-core processor from AMD. The second fastest 8-core processor will be the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT, followed by the more economical AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, also with 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Ryzen 7 5800X clocks with a base clock of 3.8 GHz and reaches up to 4.7 GHz on one core in turbo mode. When all 8 cores are utilized, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, achieves up to 4.5 GHz.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The CCX structure has changed somewhat compared to Zen2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8-CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity-Fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4.000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5800X in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-10900K and also the Core i7-12700F, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

In games, AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X can convince with its significantly improved IPC and even put Intel in its place. With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, gamers are well prepared for the future as simultaneous streaming is no problem with the new Ryzen 7 5800X. Semi-professional content creators, who need even more power, can choose a Ryzen 9 5900X or the Ryzen 9 5950X on the shelf.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. This applies as long as the CPU runs at stock clock speeds.

Ryzen 7 5800X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process; as rumors have it, the I/O die is manufactured separately on the 12 nm Global Foundries process.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5800XIntel Core i5-10400F
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet Lake
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X compare3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X « 3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X compare3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4700 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache32 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP105 Watt65 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
Die Size2 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86
$449 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X
44.8 pt (62%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15241     avg: 15476     median: 15476 (14%)     max: 15711 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1554     avg: 1575     median: 1574.5 (67%)     max: 1595 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624     avg: 625     median: 624.5 (69%)     max: 625 Points
438 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6068     avg: 6075     median: 6074.5 (15%)     max: 6081 Points
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2601     avg: 2609     median: 2608.5 (16%)     max: 2616 Points
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 265     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (80%)     max: 266 Points
180 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.3 Points (38%)
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (77%)
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6835 Points (41%)
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
45548 Points (33%)
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
83426 Points (58%)
47901 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13039 Points (16%)
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
86.1 s (1%)
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15604 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 69921     avg: 72114     median: 72113.5 (41%)     max: 74306 MIPS
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6843     avg: 6907     median: 6906.5 (83%)     max: 6970 MIPS
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
152 fps (53%)
81.2 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
339 fps (78%)
228.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.8     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.8 fps
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15 GB/s (39%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 331     avg: 336     median: 336 (4%)     max: 341 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 196.8     avg: 196.9     median: 196.9 (1%)     max: 197 Seconds
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4509     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15873 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.8 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
365.8 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
86050 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23381     avg: 23704     median: 23703.5 (64%)     max: 24026 Points
14539 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
94127 Points (76%)
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
94179 Points (76%)
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
96702 Points (81%)
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
22992 Points (58%)
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29163     avg: 30051     median: 30050.5 (54%)     max: 30938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11599     avg: 11652     median: 11652 (49%)     max: 11705 Points
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1665     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (71%)     max: 1701 Points
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10093     avg: 10724     median: 10723.5 (19%)     max: 11354 Points
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1673 Points (7%)
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11246 Points (35%)
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7333 Points (73%)
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44131 Points (48%)
25403 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 558     avg: 576     median: 575.5 (1%)     max: 593 ms
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
245 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 296     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 307 Points
215 Points (45%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1541 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
242.3 Watt (42%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
220.7 Watt (40%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.9 Points per Watt (9%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 72% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 22:52:01

#0 checking url part for id 12783 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720039920 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12783 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 12783 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.066s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.103s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)