Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5800U vs Intel Core i7-11390H

AMD Ryzen 7 5800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. The R7 5800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture and is the fastest U-series processor at launch. They are clocked at 1.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process.

The new Zen 3 microarchitecture offers a significantly higher IPC (instructions per clock) compared to Zen 2. For desktop processors AMD claims 19 percent on average and in applications reviews showed around 12% gains at the same clock speed.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU with 8 CUs at up to 2000 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Performance

The average 5800U in our database matches the Core i5-11260H and, perhaps a little disappointingly, the Ryzen 7 4800U in multi-core performance.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 22 W, the ProBook x360 435 G8 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 5800U that we know of. It can be more than 10% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers are allowed to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Choosing the lowest value would allow one to build a passively cooled system around the Ryzen, however, most laptop manufacturers will do the opposite to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The Ryzen 7 5800U is built with TSMC's 7 nm process for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-11390H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11390H

The Intel Core i7-11390H is a high-end quad-core SoC for thin and light gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H35 generation and was announced in mid-2021 as a refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and can vary from 2.9 (28 W TDP) to 3.4 GHz (35 W). Compared to the i7-11375H, the 11390H can now also boost with two cores up to 5 GHz and all four cores can reach a 300 MHz higher clock speed of 4.6 GHz. Both i7 use the whole 12 MB level 3 cache.

The SoC also includes the improved Xe iGPU with all 96 EUs enabled clocked at up to 1400 MHz.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Performance

The average 11390H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U and the Intel Core i7-10710U in multi-thread performance to be a decent mid-range chip, as of late 2021 - provided one isn't too picky when it comes to load times.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i7 series chip has a default TDP of 28 W to 35 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, a proper coolu\ing solution is a must.

The CPU is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm manufacturing process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5800UIntel Core i7-11390H
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Tiger Lake
CodenameCezanne-U (Zen 3)Tiger Lake-H35
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-H35
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U « 1.9 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U compare2.3 - 4.2 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U compare2.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11390H « 3.4 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11375H compare3.3 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11370H compare3.3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11320H compare3.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11300H compare3.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock1900 - 4400 MHz3400 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB320 KB
L2 Cache4 MB5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 8
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800U
37.3 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11390H
36.6 pt (51%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
92 Points (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
323 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7872     avg: 8851     median: 8154 (8%)     max: 10624 Points
min: 4570     avg: 5622     median: 5917 (5%)     max: 6379 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1415     avg: 1425     median: 1427 (61%)     max: 1430 Points
min: 1407     avg: 1537     median: 1602 (68%)     max: 1602 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 551     avg: 555     median: 555 (62%)     max: 560 Points
min: 550     avg: 595     median: 614 (68%)     max: 620 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2995     avg: 3347     median: 3303 (8%)     max: 3691 Points
min: 1767     avg: 2138     median: 2284 (6%)     max: 2362 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1390     avg: 1628     median: 1613 (10%)     max: 1925 Points
min: 775     avg: 923     median: 953 (6%)     max: 1041 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 227     avg: 228.5     median: 229 (69%)     max: 229 Points
min: 209     avg: 226.7     median: 232 (70%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.8 Points (19%)
10.7 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (67%)
2.8 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6039 Points (36%)
9604 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26711 Points (19%)
29456 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
46311 Points (32%)
39426 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11485 Points (14%)
12516 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
136.5 s (2%)
196.9 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
6.5 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6144     avg: 6375     median: 6374.5 (10%)     max: 6605 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39618     avg: 42703     median: 42603.5 (24%)     max: 45985 MIPS
min: 20822     avg: 24957     median: 25876 (15%)     max: 28173 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5285     avg: 5354     median: 5362.5 (64%)     max: 5405 MIPS
min: 5539     avg: 5705     median: 5682 (68%)     max: 5895 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.8 fps (28%)
min: 55.2     avg: 58.6     median: 58.6 (20%)     max: 61.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
230.5 fps (53%)
min: 214.5     avg: 232.3     median: 232.3 (54%)     max: 250.1 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.68     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (18%)     max: 11 fps
min: 5.84     avg: 7.1     median: 7.6 (13%)     max: 7.86 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.509     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.62 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.838     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (16%)     max: 0.98 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.4     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (16%)     max: 6.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 943     avg: 1101     median: 1101 (14%)     max: 1259 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 319     avg: 353.4     median: 351.9 (2%)     max: 391 Seconds
min: 495     avg: 558     median: 513 (4%)     max: 665 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.54     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.546 sec
min: 0.537     avg: 0.6     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.571 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10089     avg: 10151     median: 10150.5 (22%)     max: 10212 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.8 s (2%)
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (1%)     max: 6.842 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.2 s (1%)
min: 14.6     avg: 14.7     median: 14.7 (1%)     max: 14.733 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
514 s (2%)
min: 348.305     avg: 349.8     median: 349.8 (2%)     max: 351.3 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33890     avg: 34012     median: 34012 (30%)     max: 34134 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10893     avg: 12059     median: 12124 (33%)     max: 13093 Points
min: 7311     avg: 10440     median: 10604 (29%)     max: 13242 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75960 Points (62%)
min: 9451     avg: 46134     median: 52957 (43%)     max: 75994 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75286 Points (61%)
min: 9451     avg: 31285     median: 31284.5 (25%)     max: 53118 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
83999 Points (71%)
min: 64799     avg: 65805     median: 65804.5 (55%)     max: 66810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12642     avg: 13408     median: 13484 (34%)     max: 14021 Points
min: 8079     avg: 8821     median: 8292.5 (21%)     max: 10618 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15881     avg: 17158     median: 17427.5 (31%)     max: 17897 Points
min: 9456     avg: 11705     median: 10814 (19%)     max: 15737 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5352     avg: 5793     median: 5704 (24%)     max: 6410 Points
min: 3391     avg: 4236     median: 4598 (19%)     max: 4719 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2114     avg: 2194     median: 2194 (59%)     max: 2274 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 5066     avg: 5630     median: 5630 (22%)     max: 6194 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1411     avg: 1430     median: 1428.5 (60%)     max: 1450 Points
min: 1486     avg: 1599     median: 1615.5 (68%)     max: 1677 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6093     avg: 6641     median: 6722.5 (12%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 4457     avg: 5306     median: 5235.5 (9%)     max: 6297 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1411 Points (6%)
1655 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7053 Points (22%)
5025 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5878 Points (59%)
min: 7105     avg: 7126     median: 7125.5 (71%)     max: 7146 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28418 Points (31%)
min: 20385     avg: 22986     median: 22986 (25%)     max: 25587 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 632     avg: 636     median: 633 (1%)     max: 646 ms
min: 589     avg: 632     median: 645.5 (1%)     max: 647 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.6 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 63284     avg: 65366     median: 64961 (57%)     max: 67852 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
204 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 248     avg: 252.3     median: 249 (52%)     max: 260 Points
min: 261     avg: 266.5     median: 266.5 (56%)     max: 272 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1335 Points (51%)
min: 1274     avg: 1356     median: 1356 (52%)     max: 1438 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28     avg: 30     median: 28.9 (5%)     max: 34.1 Watt
min: 35     avg: 48.6     median: 53.2 (9%)     max: 57.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 26.9     avg: 34.1     median: 33.2 (6%)     max: 42.9 Watt
min: 35     avg: 49.5     median: 50.7 (9%)     max: 62.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 8.39     avg: 9.2     median: 9.2 (6%)     max: 10 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 43.5     avg: 48     median: 48.3 (36%)     max: 51.9 Points per Watt
min: 16.6     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 22.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800U → 100% n=40

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11390H → 91% n=40

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 19:02:09

#0 checking url part for id 12976 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13167 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720112528 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12976 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12976 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13167 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 13167 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.078s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)