Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X vs Intel Core i5-10400F vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is a desktop processor with 8 cores and simultaneous multithreading (SMT), which means it can process 16 threads simultaneously. In April 2022, AMD presented the Ryzen 7 5700X, a new 8-core processor that is very similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, due to the lower TDP, there are no restrictions on the clock frequency. Nevertheless, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X reaches up to 4.6 GHz in boost, which is only 100 MHz less than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. However, the base clock drops significantly to 3.4 GHz.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is consistently excellent in all applications. The native 8-core can really show off its strengths, especially in multi-threaded applications, although the single-core performance has also been significantly improved compared to the older Zen 2 architecture.

The internal structure of the processor is similar to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. The CCX modules are also connected to each other via the I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. However, according to AMD, the Infinity Fabric should now achieve clock rates of up to 2 GHz, which in turn enables a RAM clock rate of 4,000 MHz without any loss of performance.

In terms of manufacturing processes, AMD also relies on TSCM for the 7nm production of the CPU cores in the Vermeer processors, although the I/O die is still supplied in 12 nm by Globalfoundries.

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is impressive in gaming thanks to the significantly improved IPC compared to Zen2. In terms of power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X impresses with its low TDP of just 65 watts. This means that the processor can also be operated with a compact air cooler without any problems. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is operated with a TDP of 105 watts.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5800X

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core desktop processor with Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT), which allows it to process 16 threads simultaneously. With its launch on 08.10.2020, it is the fastest 8-core processor from AMD. The second fastest 8-core processor will be the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT, followed by the more economical AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, also with 8 cores and 16 threads.

The Ryzen 7 5800X clocks with a base clock of 3.8 GHz and reaches up to 4.7 GHz on one core in turbo mode. When all 8 cores are utilized, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, achieves up to 4.5 GHz.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The CCX structure has changed somewhat compared to Zen2, because now a CCX consists of up to 8-CPU cores. So each individual core can access the complete L3 cache (32 MByte). Furthermore the CCX modules are connected to each other via the same I/O die, which we already know from Zen2. According to AMD, the Infinity-Fabric should now reach clock rates of up to 2Ghz, which in turn allows a RAM clock of 4.000 MHz without performance loss.

Performance

The average 5800X in our database is in the same league as the Core i9-10900K and also the Core i7-12700F, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

In games, AMD's Ryzen 7 5800X can convince with its significantly improved IPC and even put Intel in its place. With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, gamers are well prepared for the future as simultaneous streaming is no problem with the new Ryzen 7 5800X. Semi-professional content creators, who need even more power, can choose a Ryzen 9 5900X or the Ryzen 9 5950X on the shelf.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 105 W. This applies as long as the CPU runs at stock clock speeds.

Ryzen 7 5800X is built with TSMC's 7 nm process; as rumors have it, the I/O die is manufactured separately on the 12 nm Global Foundries process.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5700XIntel Core i5-10400FAMD Ryzen 7 5800X
SeriesAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)Intel Comet LakeAMD Vermeer (Ryzen 5000)
CodenameVermeer (Zen 3)Comet LakeVermeer (Zen 3)
Series: Vermeer (Ryzen 5000) Vermeer (Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X « 3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X3.4 - 4.9 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X « 3.8 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3.4 - 4.6 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3400 - 4600 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz3800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB4 MB
L3 Cache32 MB12 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 128 / 16
TDP65 Watt65 Watt105 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm7 nm
Die Size2 x 74 sq. mm; I/O = 125 sq. mm mm22 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C100 °C90 °C
Socket1331LGA1200AM4 (LGA1331)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2DDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$299 U.S.$155 U.S.$449 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5700X
42.8 pt (59%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5800X
44.8 pt (62%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13184 Points (12%)
min: 15241     avg: 15476     median: 15476 (14%)     max: 15711 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1499 Points (64%)
min: 1554     avg: 1575     median: 1574.5 (67%)     max: 1595 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
595 Points (66%)
438 Points (49%)
min: 624     avg: 625     median: 624.5 (69%)     max: 625 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5405 Points (13%)
3201 Points (8%)
min: 6068     avg: 6075     median: 6074.5 (15%)     max: 6081 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2329 Points (15%)
1332 Points (8%)
min: 2601     avg: 2609     median: 2608.5 (16%)     max: 2616 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
253 Points (76%)
180 Points (54%)
min: 265     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (80%)     max: 266 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.5 Points (34%)
14.4 Points (19%)
29.3 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.9 Points (73%)
2 Points (50%)
3.1 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6527 Points (39%)
6719 Points (41%)
6835 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42876 Points (31%)
36564 Points (26%)
45548 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
74898 Points (52%)
47901 Points (33%)
83426 Points (58%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
12419 Points (15%)
8849 Points (11%)
13039 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
89.6 s (1%)
134.7 s (2%)
86.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.4 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12478 Points (20%)
15604 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
65777 MIPS (38%)
36731 MIPS (21%)
min: 69921     avg: 72114     median: 72113.5 (41%)     max: 74306 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6522 MIPS (78%)
5064 MIPS (61%)
min: 6843     avg: 6907     median: 6906.5 (83%)     max: 6970 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.7 fps (47%)
81.2 fps (28%)
152 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305 fps (70%)
228.5 fps (53%)
339 fps (78%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.1 fps (30%)
11.2 fps (20%)
min: 19.8     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (36%)     max: 20.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.4 GB/s (35%)
15 GB/s (39%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
374 Seconds (5%)
min: 331     avg: 336     median: 336 (4%)     max: 341 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
221 Seconds (2%)
332.4 Seconds (2%)
min: 196.8     avg: 196.9     median: 196.9 (1%)     max: 197 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.4509     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4545 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14862 Points (32%)
15873 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.5 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.4 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
15.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
460.7 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
365.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
77709 Points (68%)
86050 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
20010 Points (54%)
14539 Points (39%)
min: 23381     avg: 23704     median: 23703.5 (64%)     max: 24026 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
90009 Points (73%)
62086 Points (50%)
94127 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
90305 Points (73%)
61795 Points (50%)
94179 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
92849 Points (78%)
62883 Points (53%)
96702 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20598 Points (52%)
11914 Points (30%)
22992 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27800 Points (50%)
min: 29163     avg: 30051     median: 30050.5 (54%)     max: 30938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10432 Points (44%)
7548 Points (32%)
min: 11599     avg: 11652     median: 11652 (49%)     max: 11705 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2186 Points (59%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9331 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1647 Points (69%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
min: 1665     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (71%)     max: 1701 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9353 Points (17%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
min: 10093     avg: 10724     median: 10723.5 (19%)     max: 11354 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1587 Points (7%)
1217 Points (5%)
1673 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9214 Points (29%)
6349 Points (20%)
11246 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6928 Points (69%)
5587 Points (56%)
7333 Points (73%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
37730 Points (41%)
25403 Points (28%)
44131 Points (48%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
579 ms (1%)
849 ms (1%)
min: 558     avg: 576     median: 575.5 (1%)     max: 593 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
236 Points (68%)
245 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
310 Points (65%)
215 Points (45%)
min: 296     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 307 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1423 Points (55%)
1541 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
185.9 Watt (32%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
242.3 Watt (42%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
155.2 Watt (28%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
220.7 Watt (40%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
15 Points per Watt (11%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
11.9 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5700X → 100% n=36

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 76% n=36

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5800X → 107% n=36

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 21:31:54

#0 checking url part for id 15075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12783 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719862314 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15075 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 15075 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#10 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12783 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#12 got single benchmarks 12783 +0.006s ... 0.034s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.074s ... 0.109s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.109s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)