Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4980U vs Intel Celeron N4120

AMD Ryzen 7 4980U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4980U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4980U is a Renoir family processor designed for certain Microsoft Surface systems. 4980U has eight Zen 2 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.4 GHz (Boost) with thread-doubling SMT tech enabled for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to that AMD promises a 2x improvement in performance-per-Watt over Ryzen 3000 series mobile CPUs.

Architecture

The Zen 2 microarchitecture has brought a sizeable per-thread performance boost compared to the outgoing Zen+ parts. Renoir product family is also the first to introduce 8-core ULV processors to laptop market, keeping power consumption within reasonable limits. This AMD processor family is very impressive from most perspectives. One of the disatvantages to keep in mind is the lack of PCI-Express 4 support, meaning these blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to 3.9 GB/s tops.

Ryzen 7 4980U is designed to work with quad-channel LPDDR4 memory at up to 4,267 MHz. 8 MB of Level 3 are present in this chip. The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir hub page for more information on the product family.

Performance

The 4980U is the fastest U-class Ryzen 4000 series chip. As such, its clock speeds are 200 MHz higher (both the base one and Boost one) than what the Ryzen 7 4800U has.

It is thus hardly surprising that the average 4980U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800U and also the Core i7-1260P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Graphics

In addition to its eight CPU cores, the Ryzen 7 also features the Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (= 512 shaders) at up to 1,950 MHz. This iGPU is compatible with FreeSync and DirectX 12 and is able to HW-decode AVC, HEVC, VP9-encoded videos (no AV1 support here). Vega 8 is capable of outputting UHD 2160p60 video signal to several monitors and, similar to Intel's Iris Xe (80 EUs), is good enough for a bit of light gaming on the go, provided one is content with sub-1080p resolutions and low/medium quailty presets.

Power consumption

The APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W; much like it is with other U-class Ryzen 4000 chips, AMD is fine with laptop makers (Microsoft, in this case) changing that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen 7 is built with makes for above average, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4120 in our database is not much faster than AMD's Zen-based, affordable Athlon Silver 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the Intel Celeron 6305 and the Core i5-7Y54 found close nearby as well. It's a very basic CPU that we're talking about here. While it does have four cores, these are some seriously slow cores, dashing hopes of anybody looking to get a Core i3-like performance for cheap.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, Celeron N4120 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a good option for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. It's manufactured on a very old (as of late 2022) 14 nm process, though, making for poor energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4980UIntel Celeron N4120
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Gemini Lake
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Gemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U « 2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U compare1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 4400 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6BGA1090
FeaturesLPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1950 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4980U
33.6 pt (47%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4120
17.4 pt (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
9164 Points (9%)
min: 965     avg: 1149     median: 1230 (1%)     max: 1253 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1260 Points (54%)
min: 409     avg: 416.5     median: 416.5 (18%)     max: 424 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
492 Points (55%)
min: 159     avg: 163.3     median: 165 (18%)     max: 166 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3453 Points (8%)
min: 376     avg: 460.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 516 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1658 Points (10%)
min: 223     avg: 227     median: 224 (1%)     max: 234 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
182 Points (55%)
min: 73     avg: 73.6     median: 73.2 (22%)     max: 74.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.9 Points (25%)
2.7 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5715 Points (35%)
2159 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
35106 Points (25%)
6432 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
661 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
17.6 s (4%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
236.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.4 s (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
42368 MIPS (24%)
min: 5832     avg: 6817     median: 7184 (4%)     max: 7436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4320 MIPS (52%)
min: 2145     avg: 2279     median: 2279 (27%)     max: 2412 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.8 fps (17%)
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
342 Seconds (2%)
min: 2558     avg: 2571     median: 2570.5 (18%)     max: 2583 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 1.642     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (36%)     max: 1.649 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3403 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.6 s (2%)
25.6 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.8 s (1%)
58.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
758 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
11759 Points (32%)
min: 2626     avg: 2669     median: 2668.5 (7%)     max: 2711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10152 Points (26%)
min: 2251     avg: 2348     median: 2373 (6%)     max: 2421 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18654 Points (33%)
min: 3496     avg: 3723     median: 3688 (7%)     max: 3984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5917 Points (25%)
min: 909     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (4%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1133 Points (48%)
min: 438     avg: 442     median: 439 (19%)     max: 449 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7156 Points (13%)
min: 1505     avg: 1525     median: 1509 (3%)     max: 1561 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 435     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (2%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1492     avg: 1503     median: 1503 (5%)     max: 1514 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1864     avg: 1885     median: 1876 (19%)     max: 1915 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5477     avg: 5606     median: 5668 (6%)     max: 5674 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
811 ms (1%)
min: 2125     avg: 2308     median: 2345.5 (3%)     max: 2415 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
520 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16865     avg: 17701     median: 17701 (16%)     max: 18537 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
210 Points (44%)
min: 85     avg: 90.9     median: 86.2 (18%)     max: 106 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 3.0 Battery Life
383 min (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28061 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8969 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.3 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4980U → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → 39% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 09:29:11

#0 checking url part for id 13176 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11533 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720078151 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13176 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 13176 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11533 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 11533 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)