Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs Intel Celeron N4020

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

Intel Celeron N4020

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4020

The Intel Celeron N4020 is a slow dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in laptops and mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.8 GHz, the latter being a moderate 200 MHz upgrade over the preceding N4000 chip. Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and an integrated UHD 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, the N4020 is manufactured on a really old, as of late 2023, 14 nm process. What makes the newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, a reduction in physical size.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is not much different from what was used in Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A relatively large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of N4020's strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to processors of previous generations. Still, Gemini Lake refresh processors are a clear step down from Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

The N4020 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few N4020-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s, though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight to the motherboard for good (BGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

While slightly faster than the outgoing Celeron N4000, the average N4020 in our extensive database only just manages to match the N6211, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. These three chips deliver multi-thread CB R15, CB R20 and CB R23 scores that are so low, they lag behind a single-thread score of any half-decent CPU such as an i5-1135G7. In other words, these Celeron N chips are good enough for basic tasks only such as word processing and Web browsing with two or three tabs open at a time.

The Celeron N4120, a quad-core chip with a similar name, has little trouble leaving the N4020 behind in most workloads - which is not to say it is a fast CPU.

Jacking the long-term power limit value up to something like 9 W will help improve system responsiveness noticeably.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like the  HD Graphics 520 or the UHD Graphics 615 or other widespread Intel iGPUs found in Core i3/i5/i7/i9 processors of generations six to ten.

Just like the HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 is DX12 compatible. The iGPU's 12 EUs can run at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about as far as its talents go.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution can drive up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a limit on video resolutions that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power consumption

The low 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) makes it easy for laptop makers to ditch the fan. Performance sustainability will be poor unless the long-term Power Limit is set to a value higher than the default 6 W and a fan is available to aid in heat dissipation.

The Celeron N4020 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 4800UIntel Celeron N4020
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Gemini Lake
CodenameRenoir-U (Zen 2)Gemini Lake refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake refresh
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U compare2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U compare2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U compare2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U compare2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U compare2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U compare2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 4200 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 2
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFP6BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL215 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4020
16.1 pt (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
616 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
308 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
min: 149.8     avg: 162.4     median: 162.4 (18%)     max: 175 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
min: 242     avg: 279     median: 279 (1%)     max: 316 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
min: 110.1     avg: 127.1     median: 127.1 (1%)     max: 144.1 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
min: 68.6     avg: 73.8     median: 73.8 (22%)     max: 78.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
2184 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
4498 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
2456 MIPS (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
min: 0.73     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.92 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
4064 Seconds (29%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
1.5 sec (33%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
min: 1560     avg: 1650     median: 1650 (4%)     max: 1740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58600 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58705 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67233 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
1286 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1853     median: 1853 (3%)     max: 1854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
476 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
min: 319     avg: 418.7     median: 462 (19%)     max: 475 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
min: 663     avg: 786     median: 836 (1%)     max: 858 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1162 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7298 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
min: 1989     avg: 2004     median: 2004 (20%)     max: 2019 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
min: 3404     avg: 3433     median: 3433 (4%)     max: 3462 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
min: 2300     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (3%)     max: 2676 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
36619 Points (32%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49.4     avg: 55.3     median: 55.3 (16%)     max: 61.1 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
min: 76.2     avg: 80.2     median: 80.2 (17%)     max: 84.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
310 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
12.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
10.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
14.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4020 → 36% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 30. 09:12:06

#0 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11535 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719731526 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11535 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 11535 +0.015s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.041s ... 0.078s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)