Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT vs Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Processor N200

AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT

► remove from comparison AMD R7 3800XT

The AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT is a fast desktop processor with 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 2 architecture. At launch it is the fastest 8-core-CPU of the Matisse series. The 3800XT clocks from 3.9 GHz (base) up to 4.7 GHz (Turbo). All eight cores can reach up to 4.2 GHz.

Performance

The average 3800XT in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-12500H, Core i5-13500H, Core i9-10910, Ryzen 7 5700G, Ryzen 7 7735HS, Ryzen 9 6900HS, Ryzen 9 6900HX, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series processor has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 105 W. Needless to say, if one was to overclock it, the chip's power consumption would go up by a huge margin.

The R7 3800XT is built with TSMC's 7 nm process making for average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 3800XTIntel Processor N100Intel Processor N200
SeriesAMD Matisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)Intel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
CodenameMatisse (Zen 2)Alder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X3.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X3.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 39003.1 - 4.3 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT « 3.9 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X3.6 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X3.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 31003.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock3900 - 4700 MHz1000 - 3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB
L3 Cache32 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP105 Watt6 Watt6 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86x86
$399 U.S.$128 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 3800XT
39.1 pt (54%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
25.2 pt (35%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (42%)     max: 61 Points
74%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
47%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2378     median: 2203 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
64%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 747     avg: 881     median: 907 (39%)     max: 942 Points
76%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
544 Points (60%)
min: 285     avg: 336.6     median: 346 (38%)     max: 358 Points
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5120 Points (12%)
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 842 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2230 Points (14%)
min: 246     avg: 371.3     median: 336 (2%)     max: 479 Points
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
219 Points (66%)
min: 118.8     avg: 143     median: 146 (44%)     max: 155 Points
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.2 Points (31%)
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (6%)     max: 5.99 Points
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (59%)
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (44%)     max: 1.87 Points
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6035 Points (36%)
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
3937 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40528 Points (29%)
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
7549 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
68388 Points (47%)
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (12%)     max: 24225 Points
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10497 Points (13%)
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
81.4 s (1%)
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
875 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.7 s (1%)
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
26 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7467 Points (12%)
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
59247 MIPS (34%)
min: 7532     avg: 10800     median: 10350 (6%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5516 MIPS (66%)
min: 3046     avg: 3623     median: 3635 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
119 fps (42%)
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (8%)     max: 34.7 fps
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
271 fps (63%)
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (28%)     max: 173 fps
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.1 fps (28%)
min: 1.72     avg: 2.7     median: 2.5 (4%)     max: 3.49 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2624     median: 2373 (30%)     max: 3964 Seconds
65%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
222.7 Seconds (2%)
min: 1017     avg: 1360     median: 1346 (9%)     max: 1956 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
81%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.1 s (2%)
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.6 s (1%)
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
42.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
508 s (2%)
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
1011 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (11%)     max: 15625 Points
79%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18905 Points (51%)
min: 3723     avg: 5202     median: 5818 (16%)     max: 6486 Points
2765 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82027 Points (67%)
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
82302 Points (67%)
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
84207 Points (71%)
min: 50867     avg: 52297     median: 52338 (44%)     max: 53373 Points
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14253 Points (36%)
min: 3133     avg: 3873     median: 3565 (9%)     max: 4693 Points
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25132 Points (45%)
min: 4589     avg: 5712     median: 5889 (10%)     max: 6602 Points
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10302 Points (43%)
min: 1407     avg: 1925     median: 1610 (7%)     max: 2516 Points
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1192     median: 1227 (33%)     max: 1245 Points
78%
1 N200 +
956 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2892     median: 3133 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
53%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1353 Points (57%)
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 991 (42%)     max: 1018 Points
928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8948 Points (16%)
min: 1911     avg: 2567     median: 2812.5 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
1540 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1360 Points (6%)
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
891 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
9163 Points (29%)
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
1518 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5830 Points (58%)
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
4552 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
35526 Points (39%)
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (12%)     max: 11264 Points
9989 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
683 ms (1%)
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1053     median: 1024 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
1460 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.3     median: 133.3 (38%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
249 Points (52%)
min: 156.3     avg: 170.3     median: 170.4 (36%)     max: 187.4 Points
171.3 Points (36%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 774     median: 785 (30%)     max: 839 Points
78%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
191.8 Watt (33%)
145%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 20.3     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 29.1 Watt
146%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
193.7 Watt (35%)
149%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
151%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.5     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
102%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
3.9 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
159%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.3     median: 18.3 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
140%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 52% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 45% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 04:53:17

#0 checking url part for id 12265 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720061597 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12265 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 12265 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.011s ... 0.03s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#12 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.082s ... 0.12s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.12s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)