Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs Intel Core i7-1185G7

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 4650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4650U integrates six cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.1 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) with SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips.

The PRO processors offer a range of business features like hardware security (e.g., AMD Memory Guard), manageability (e.g., support for Microsoft Endpoint Manager), and longer availability and software stability.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4650U in our database is just as fast as the Intel Core i7-11375H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U are in multi-thread workloads. This is a fairly decent mid-range CPU, as of late 2021.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Which is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs, besides, laptop makers aren't really obliged to stick to it.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1185G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1185G7

The Intel Core i7-1185G7 is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation (UP3) that was introduced September 2020. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). Each core can clock from 1.2 GHz (12 W base clock speed), 3 GHz (28 W base clock speed) to 4.8 GHz (single-core boost). All cores at once can clock at up to 4.3 GHz. At the time of announcement, the i7-1185G7 is the fastest model of the line-up. Since early 2021, the i7-1185G7 supports management features like vPro.

Another novelty is the integrated Iris Xe iGPU based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake). In the i7-1185G7 it uses 96 EUs and clocks between 400 - 1,350 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 12 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

Performance

The average 1185G7 in our database is just as fast as AMD's hexa-core Ryzen 5 4500U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While the i7 is not the fastest Tiger Lake chip by any stretch of imagination, it's more than usable for your productivity and creative apps, with a bit of gaming possible as well.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 55 W, the Stealth 15M A11SEK is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1185G7 that we know of. It can be almost twice as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This little Core i7 here has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop manufacturers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The chip is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650UIntel Core i7-1185G7
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Tiger Lake
CodenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Tiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compare1.7 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U « 2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 « 3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4000 MHz3000 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB320 KB
L2 Cache3 MB5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 4650U
31.4 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1185G7
34.4 pt (48%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3610     avg: 5324     median: 5383.5 (5%)     max: 6383 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1251     avg: 1449     median: 1455.5 (62%)     max: 1532 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 453     avg: 453.5     median: 453.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 489     avg: 557     median: 558.5 (62%)     max: 593 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2561     avg: 2613     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 2692 Points
min: 1425     avg: 2039     median: 2090 (5%)     max: 2493 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1123     avg: 1153     median: 1161 (7%)     max: 1168 Points
min: 617     avg: 859     median: 866 (5%)     max: 1066 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 175.5     median: 175 (53%)     max: 177 Points
min: 168     avg: 215.4     median: 217 (65%)     max: 230 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.9 Points (17%)
min: 8.99     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.67 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
min: 2.52     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (63%)     max: 2.56 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5289 Points (32%)
min: 8782     avg: 8872     median: 8872 (54%)     max: 8962 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
27559 Points (20%)
min: 26426     avg: 27025     median: 27024.5 (20%)     max: 27623 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
44658 Points (31%)
min: 35564     avg: 36392     median: 36391.5 (25%)     max: 37219 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9114 Points (11%)
min: 10927     avg: 11135     median: 11135 (14%)     max: 11343 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
240.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.71     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (1%)     max: 6.875 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
235.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.7 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3795 Points (6%)
6045 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 30895     avg: 31827     median: 31980 (18%)     max: 32454 MIPS
min: 18812     avg: 23288     median: 23471 (13%)     max: 27693 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4202     avg: 4252     median: 4223 (50%)     max: 4359 MIPS
min: 3678     avg: 5112     median: 5153 (62%)     max: 5507 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
46.6 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
198.8 fps (46%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.82     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (14%)     max: 8.14 fps
min: 5.02     avg: 6.6     median: 6.6 (12%)     max: 8.13 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.4 GB/s (14%)
5.8 GB/s (15%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1099     avg: 1103     median: 1102.5 (14%)     max: 1106 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 415     avg: 430     median: 428.5 (3%)     max: 448 Seconds
min: 478     avg: 588     median: 578.5 (4%)     max: 745 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.643     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.663 sec
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.615 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10182 Points (22%)
9108 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
7.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
15.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
380.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
29182 Points (26%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8601     avg: 8770     median: 8703 (24%)     max: 9005 Points
min: 5707     avg: 10641     median: 11284 (31%)     max: 12726 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 69716     avg: 71020     median: 71351 (58%)     max: 71993 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 69895     avg: 70538     median: 70537.5 (57%)     max: 71180 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 67339     avg: 69256     median: 69331.5 (58%)     max: 71022 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9774 Points (25%)
min: 5114     avg: 8442     median: 8804 (22%)     max: 10133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14641     avg: 15359     median: 15448.5 (28%)     max: 15899 Points
min: 7886     avg: 13151     median: 13684 (24%)     max: 14680 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4299     avg: 4438     median: 4444 (19%)     max: 4565 Points
min: 2489     avg: 4447     median: 4495 (19%)     max: 5608 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1065     avg: 1077     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1102 Points
min: 1398     avg: 1520     median: 1529 (65%)     max: 1626 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4581     avg: 4646     median: 4648.5 (8%)     max: 4705 Points
min: 4620     avg: 5460     median: 5550 (10%)     max: 5944 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1217     avg: 1485     median: 1531.5 (7%)     max: 1561 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4542     avg: 5511     median: 5578.5 (18%)     max: 6349 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4475 Points (45%)
min: 5587     avg: 6340     median: 6437 (64%)     max: 6682 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
19220 Points (21%)
min: 20763     avg: 22357     median: 22175 (24%)     max: 25403 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
22199 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4010 Points (78%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22604 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4202 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 866     avg: 867     median: 867 (1%)     max: 869 ms
min: 618     avg: 649     median: 645 (1%)     max: 695 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43657     avg: 44815     median: 44814.5 (39%)     max: 45972 Points
min: 59942     avg: 62365     median: 61608 (54%)     max: 66300 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.4     avg: 189.9     median: 189.9 (55%)     max: 190.4 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 185     avg: 187     median: 186 (39%)     max: 190 Points
min: 230     avg: 251.2     median: 253 (53%)     max: 270 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1233     avg: 1343     median: 1325 (51%)     max: 1474 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.9     avg: 37.2     median: 37.2 (6%)     max: 37.5 Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 43.8     median: 44.6 (8%)     max: 59.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 40.1 Watt
min: 33.7     avg: 48.1     median: 46.9 (9%)     max: 68.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.9     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 29.5 Points per Watt
min: 12.3     avg: 17.3     median: 17.5 (13%)     max: 21.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1185G7 → 107% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:21:37

#0 checking url part for id 12193 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12248 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720074097 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12193 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12193 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12248 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 12248 +0.027s ... 0.048s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.098s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)