Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs Intel Core i3-1125G4

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 4650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4650U integrates six cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.1 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) with SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips.

The PRO processors offer a range of business features like hardware security (e.g., AMD Memory Guard), manageability (e.g., support for Microsoft Endpoint Manager), and longer availability and software stability.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4650U in our database is just as fast as the Intel Core i7-11375H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U are in multi-thread workloads. This is a fairly decent mid-range CPU, as of late 2021.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Which is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs, besides, laptop makers aren't really obliged to stick to it.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i3-1125G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1125G4

The Intel Core i3-1125G4 is a 28 W quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks of the Tiger Lake family (UP3) that was introduced in September 2020. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). Each core can clock from 2 GHz (guaranteed base speed @ 28 W) to 3.7 GHz (single-core boost). All cores at once can clock at up to 3.3 GHz. The faster Core i7 models offer more Level 3 cache (12 versus 8 MB in the i5) and higher clocked cores.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe GPU based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1125G4 Intel names the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 8 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

Performance

While we have not tested a single laptop built around the 1125G4 as of October 2023, we expect the chip's multi-thread performance to be 10% to 20% lower than that of the Core i5-1135G7 (4 cores, 8 threads, somewhat higher clock speeds).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i3-1125G4 is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650UIntel Core i3-1125G4
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Tiger Lake
CodenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Tiger Lake-UP3
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compare1.7 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U « 2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 « 2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4000 MHz2000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB320 KB
L2 Cache3 MB5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 4650U
31.4 pt (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 453     avg: 453.5     median: 453.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2561     avg: 2613     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 2692 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1123     avg: 1153     median: 1161 (7%)     max: 1168 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 175.5     median: 175 (53%)     max: 177 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.9 Points (17%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5289 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
27559 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
44658 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9114 Points (11%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
235.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.7 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3795 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 30895     avg: 31827     median: 31980 (18%)     max: 32454 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4202     avg: 4252     median: 4223 (50%)     max: 4359 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.82     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (14%)     max: 8.14 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.4 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 415     avg: 430     median: 428.5 (3%)     max: 448 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.643     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.663 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10182 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8601     avg: 8770     median: 8703 (24%)     max: 9005 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9774 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14641     avg: 15359     median: 15448.5 (28%)     max: 15899 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4299     avg: 4438     median: 4444 (19%)     max: 4565 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1065     avg: 1077     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1102 Points
1198 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4581     avg: 4646     median: 4648.5 (8%)     max: 4705 Points
3738 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4475 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
19220 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
22199 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4010 Points (78%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22604 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4202 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 866     avg: 867     median: 867 (1%)     max: 869 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43657     avg: 44815     median: 44814.5 (39%)     max: 45972 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 185     avg: 187     median: 186 (39%)     max: 190 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.9     avg: 37.2     median: 37.2 (6%)     max: 37.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 40.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.9     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 29.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1125G4 → 96% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 08:43:20

#0 checking url part for id 12193 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12740 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720075399 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12193 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 12193 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12740 +0s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 12740 +0s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.036s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)