Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 4650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4650U integrates six cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.1 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) with SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips.

The PRO processors offer a range of business features like hardware security (e.g., AMD Memory Guard), manageability (e.g., support for Microsoft Endpoint Manager), and longer availability and software stability.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4650U in our database is just as fast as the Intel Core i7-11375H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U are in multi-thread workloads. This is a fairly decent mid-range CPU, as of late 2021.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Which is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs, besides, laptop makers aren't really obliged to stick to it.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650UAMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compare1.7 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U « 2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4000 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB8 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FP7/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 4650U
31.4 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 453     avg: 453.5     median: 453.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2561     avg: 2613     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 2692 Points
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1123     avg: 1153     median: 1161 (7%)     max: 1168 Points
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 175.5     median: 175 (53%)     max: 177 Points
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.9 Points (17%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5289 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
27559 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
44658 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9114 Points (11%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
235.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.7 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3795 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 30895     avg: 31827     median: 31980 (18%)     max: 32454 MIPS
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4202     avg: 4252     median: 4223 (50%)     max: 4359 MIPS
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.82     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (14%)     max: 8.14 fps
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.4 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 415     avg: 430     median: 428.5 (3%)     max: 448 Seconds
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.643     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.663 sec
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10182 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8601     avg: 8770     median: 8703 (24%)     max: 9005 Points
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9774 Points (25%)
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14641     avg: 15359     median: 15448.5 (28%)     max: 15899 Points
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4299     avg: 4438     median: 4444 (19%)     max: 4565 Points
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1065     avg: 1077     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1102 Points
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4581     avg: 4646     median: 4648.5 (8%)     max: 4705 Points
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4475 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
19220 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
22199 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4010 Points (78%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22604 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4202 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 866     avg: 867     median: 867 (1%)     max: 869 ms
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43657     avg: 44815     median: 44814.5 (39%)     max: 45972 Points
77466 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 185     avg: 187     median: 186 (39%)     max: 190 Points
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.9     avg: 37.2     median: 37.2 (6%)     max: 37.5 Watt
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 40.1 Watt
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.9     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 29.5 Points per Watt
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 173% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 18:55:38

#0 checking url part for id 12193 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719939338 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12193 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 12193 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.061s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)