Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U vs AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 4650U

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4650U integrates six cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.1 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) with SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips.

The PRO processors offer a range of business features like hardware security (e.g., AMD Memory Guard), manageability (e.g., support for Microsoft Endpoint Manager), and longer availability and software stability.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs at up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4650U in our database is just as fast as the Intel Core i7-11375H and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600U are in multi-thread workloads. This is a fairly decent mid-range CPU, as of late 2021.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W. Which is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs, besides, laptop makers aren't really obliged to stick to it.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process, leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is a powerful Phoenix family chip that saw the light of day in H1 2023. The processor features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at 3.8 GHz. The highest Boost clock speed achievable is 5.1 GHz.

Not only does this APU has full might of the Zen 4 architecture at its disposal, it also comes with the new Ryzen AI technology that's set to make generative AI more ubiquitous than ever before. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Phoenix family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Dragon Range family chips are. The latter however lacks hardware AI workload acceleration capabilities that Phoenix has. Ryzen AI is coming after Intel's DL Boost and GNA technologies; time will tell if this move by AMD is a good idea.

Perhaps more importantly, Zen 4 introduces AVX512 support (which Zen 3 chips did not have) and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is set to bring a double-digit IPC improvement.

Elsewhere, the 7840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The average 7840HS in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-12700H, Core i7-12850HX, Core i9-12900H, Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The 7840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650UAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U compare1.7 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U « 2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2100 - 4000 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB8 MB
L3 Cache8 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 16
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketFP6FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 PRO 4650U
31.4 pt (44%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 7840HS
45.6 pt (63%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 101     avg: 104.5     median: 105 (73%)     max: 107 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 880     avg: 918     median: 918 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15515     avg: 16393     median: 16194.5 (15%)     max: 17214 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1718     avg: 1770     median: 1775 (75%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 453     avg: 453.5     median: 453.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
min: 668     avg: 687     median: 689 (77%)     max: 705 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2561     avg: 2613     median: 2599 (6%)     max: 2692 Points
min: 6061     avg: 6395     median: 6346.5 (15%)     max: 6744 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1123     avg: 1153     median: 1161 (7%)     max: 1168 Points
min: 2473     avg: 2592     median: 2573 (16%)     max: 2729 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 175.5     median: 175 (53%)     max: 177 Points
min: 270     avg: 277.7     median: 278.5 (84%)     max: 286 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
12.9 Points (17%)
min: 29.7     avg: 30     median: 30 (39%)     max: 30.25 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (50%)
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (82%)     max: 3.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5289 Points (32%)
min: 7574     avg: 7642     median: 7641.5 (46%)     max: 7709 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
27559 Points (20%)
min: 45602     avg: 47933     median: 47933 (35%)     max: 50264 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
44658 Points (31%)
min: 83726     avg: 85395     median: 85395 (59%)     max: 87064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9114 Points (11%)
min: 14015     avg: 14096     median: 14096 (17%)     max: 14177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 71.922     avg: 72.4     median: 72.4 (1%)     max: 72.819 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.626     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.658 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
235.7 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.7 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3795 Points (6%)
min: 6428     avg: 7064     median: 7063.5 (11%)     max: 7699 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 30895     avg: 31827     median: 31980 (18%)     max: 32454 MIPS
min: 59538     avg: 69127     median: 70330 (40%)     max: 73035 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4202     avg: 4252     median: 4223 (50%)     max: 4359 MIPS
min: 6049     avg: 6561     median: 6618 (79%)     max: 6754 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 144.1     avg: 146.7     median: 146.7 (51%)     max: 149.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 281.5     avg: 289.8     median: 289.8 (67%)     max: 298 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.82     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (14%)     max: 8.14 fps
min: 11.7     avg: 19.8     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 21.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (0%)
1.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.4 GB/s (14%)
min: 14.7     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (39%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 298     avg: 324.4     median: 318.5 (4%)     max: 463 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 415     avg: 430     median: 428.5 (3%)     max: 448 Seconds
min: 185     avg: 198.6     median: 196 (1%)     max: 229 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.643     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.663 sec
min: 0.4184     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4739 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10182 Points (22%)
min: 15312     avg: 15685     median: 15663 (33%)     max: 16073 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
min: 7.112     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (2%)     max: 8.774 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.6 s (1%)
min: 17.697     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 21.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
min: 655.388     avg: 690     median: 689.9 (3%)     max: 724.411 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 76708     avg: 82457     median: 83358.5 (73%)     max: 85884 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 8601     avg: 8770     median: 8703 (24%)     max: 9005 Points
min: 17320     avg: 22172     median: 22611 (61%)     max: 25584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77280     avg: 89035     median: 91414 (74%)     max: 93910 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 84349     avg: 89853     median: 91645 (74%)     max: 93208 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84416     avg: 91454     median: 92596 (78%)     max: 95508 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9774 Points (25%)
min: 13602     avg: 19764     median: 20637 (52%)     max: 21602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14641     avg: 15359     median: 15448.5 (28%)     max: 15899 Points
min: 24338     avg: 27673     median: 27816 (50%)     max: 29343 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4299     avg: 4438     median: 4444 (19%)     max: 4565 Points
min: 8903     avg: 10942     median: 11131 (47%)     max: 12218 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2585     avg: 2661     median: 2670 (72%)     max: 2721 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 12111     avg: 12994     median: 13112 (52%)     max: 13498 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1065     avg: 1077     median: 1071 (45%)     max: 1102 Points
min: 1837     avg: 1966     median: 1963.5 (83%)     max: 2017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4581     avg: 4646     median: 4648.5 (8%)     max: 4705 Points
min: 8446     avg: 11674     median: 11874 (21%)     max: 12339 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1834     avg: 1891     median: 1895.5 (8%)     max: 1936 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8572     avg: 11483     median: 11905 (38%)     max: 12278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4475 Points (45%)
min: 7924     avg: 8100     median: 8148 (81%)     max: 8166 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
19220 Points (21%)
min: 47599     avg: 48417     median: 48498 (53%)     max: 48906 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
22199 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4010 Points (78%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22604 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4202 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 866     avg: 867     median: 867 (1%)     max: 869 ms
min: 485     avg: 509     median: 512 (1%)     max: 544 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 43657     avg: 44815     median: 44814.5 (39%)     max: 45972 Points
min: 91356     avg: 91588     median: 91577 (80%)     max: 91831 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 263.8     median: 263 (76%)     max: 319 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 185     avg: 187     median: 186 (39%)     max: 190 Points
min: 288     avg: 317.1     median: 321 (67%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1566     avg: 1763     median: 1801 (69%)     max: 1891 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.9     avg: 37.2     median: 37.2 (6%)     max: 37.5 Watt
min: 64.7     avg: 93.2     median: 87.2 (15%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.4     avg: 39.8     median: 39.8 (7%)     max: 40.1 Watt
min: 74.7     avg: 98.9     median: 88.8 (16%)     max: 135.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.73     avg: 13.9     median: 11.6 (8%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.09     avg: 13.7     median: 12.6 (14%)     max: 35.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 28.9     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (22%)     max: 29.5 Points per Watt
min: 20.1     avg: 28.1     median: 29.7 (22%)     max: 33.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS → 182% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 19:25:09

#0 checking url part for id 12193 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14948 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719941109 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12193 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12193 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14948 +0.002s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 14948 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.048s ... 0.07s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)