Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Intel Core i9-13905H

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13905H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13905H

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.6 to 5.4 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.9 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.9 to 4.1 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Similar to the i9-13900H but without vPro support and the 13905H uses a different package and socket.

Performance

Thanks to the high core count and high clock speed, the Core i9-13905H is (together with the 13900HK) the fastest 45W CPU for laptops and only bested by Raptor Lake-HX based models with more cores and improved P-cores (e.g., the i9-13980HX). Still, the CPU is very well suited for all demanding use cases like gaming, content creation, and scientific calculations.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) .

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSIntel Core i9-13905H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Intel Raptor Lake-H
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-H
Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H « 1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H compare1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H compare1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H compare2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H compare1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz1900 - 5400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB
L2 Cache6 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
TDP28 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FCBGA1792
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3Thread Director
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13905H
42.9 pt (60%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17880     avg: 19384     median: 20034 (19%)     max: 20237 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1652     avg: 1901     median: 2020 (86%)     max: 2030 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 622     avg: 679     median: 639 (71%)     max: 775 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6462     avg: 7028     median: 7152 (17%)     max: 7469 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2676     avg: 2821     median: 2857 (18%)     max: 2931 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 255.3     median: 246 (74%)     max: 285 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 68880     avg: 71701     median: 69892 (40%)     max: 76332 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4871     avg: 5487     median: 5520 (66%)     max: 6069 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 20.5     avg: 21.5     median: 21.2 (37%)     max: 22.9 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 280     avg: 296     median: 302 (4%)     max: 306 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 163     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 178 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4178     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4974 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 22494     avg: 23911     median: 23894 (65%)     max: 25346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
21588 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27625     avg: 29475     median: 29193 (52%)     max: 31606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12800     avg: 13567     median: 13653 (58%)     max: 14249 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2404 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14212 Points (56%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1672     avg: 1774     median: 1685 (71%)     max: 1966 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13661     avg: 14122     median: 13707 (25%)     max: 14999 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1898 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14690 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 465     avg: 522     median: 545 (1%)     max: 557 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 243     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (76%)     max: 288 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 267     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (63%)     max: 336 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1774     avg: 1884     median: 1883.5 (72%)     max: 1993 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 139.4     avg: 140     median: 140 (24%)     max: 140.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
168.6 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16.6 (11%)     max: 17.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.7     avg: 15.8     median: 15.8 (17%)     max: 19.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
16.9 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13905H → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:37:49

#0 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14983 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719934669 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14983 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14983 +0.007s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.034s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)