Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Intel Core i7-13700H vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U, with slightly higher wattage of the 8640HS being the only meaningful difference between the two. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter, and the Ryzen AI technology, now in its 2nd generation, is onboard as well to make apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-13700H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700H

The Intel Core i7-13700H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Raptor Lake-H series (Alder Lake architecture). It was announced in early 2023 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.4 to 5 GHz (single core turbo, all-core 4.7 GHz) on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.7 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache.

Performance

The average 13700H in our database delivers multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Core i7-12700H, Core i9-12900H. This is a very, very fast CPU, as of mid 2023, even if it does not quite manage to demolish its direct predecessor (the 12700H).

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 90 W, the MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK is among the fastest systems built around the i7-13700H that we know of. It can be 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system in our database powered by the same chip, as of August 2023.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-5200 (up from 4800 MHz for the 12th gen). The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU now supports PCIe 5.0 x8 for a GPU and two PCIe 4.0 x4 for SSDs.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) clocked at up to 1.5 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 45 W base power (115 W PL2) but most laptops will use a PL1 of around 60 Watt. The SoC is manufactured in a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7 (improved over the 12th Gen).

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with a higher clocked Ryzen AI engine. To be more specific, the 8945H is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the similar 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

This powerful Ryzen 9 series processor comes with the 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology. The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSIntel Core i7-13700HAMD Ryzen 9 8945H
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)Intel Raptor Lake-HAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040)
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake-HHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c, Ryzen 8040) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HK1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13905H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900H1.9 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13800H1.8 - 5.2 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13705H1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13620H1.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600H2.1 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13505H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500H1.9 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13420H1.5 - 4.6 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz1800 - 5000 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB1.2 MB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB11.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8BGA1744FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700H
44.2 pt (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
111 Points (77%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
818 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5890     avg: 15266     median: 15541.5 (14%)     max: 20034 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1323     avg: 1797     median: 1863 (79%)     max: 1914 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 508     avg: 693     median: 719 (80%)     max: 741 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2322     avg: 5945     median: 6018.5 (15%)     max: 7674 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 905     avg: 2455     median: 2505.5 (16%)     max: 2982 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 213     avg: 260.4     median: 269 (81%)     max: 278 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
33.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (82%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10487 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
65623 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100409 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15266 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
208.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7559 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 27322     avg: 61025     median: 61381.5 (35%)     max: 76344 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4825     avg: 5858     median: 6034 (72%)     max: 6238 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
167.5 fps (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
340.5 fps (79%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.72     avg: 16.7     median: 16.9 (30%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 295     avg: 404.1     median: 385 (5%)     max: 907 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 169     avg: 229.4     median: 217 (2%)     max: 555 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4308     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.607 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13025     avg: 15916     median: 15415 (33%)     max: 19810 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
371.9 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79797 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7388     avg: 19959     median: 20503.5 (55%)     max: 25179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 81147     avg: 91751     median: 92897 (75%)     max: 100286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88650     avg: 97627     median: 99436 (81%)     max: 104795 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89385     avg: 96005     median: 98040 (83%)     max: 100591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7531     avg: 17293     median: 17753 (45%)     max: 22289 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4242     avg: 24628     median: 26188 (47%)     max: 30010 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4312     avg: 10479     median: 11075 (47%)     max: 13904 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2316     avg: 2551     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2639 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 8415     avg: 11887     median: 11872.5 (47%)     max: 13832 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1362     avg: 1792     median: 1828.5 (77%)     max: 1919 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6165     avg: 11777     median: 12127 (22%)     max: 14215 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1761     avg: 1810     median: 1815 (8%)     max: 1854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12854     avg: 13227     median: 13200 (42%)     max: 13628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8083 Points (81%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
50819 Points (56%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 513     median: 499.5 (1%)     max: 570 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 78885     avg: 90890     median: 92987 (82%)     max: 96738 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 208     avg: 262.7     median: 270 (78%)     max: 325 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 215     avg: 289.3     median: 297 (62%)     max: 321 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1205     avg: 1757     median: 1768 (68%)     max: 2073 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 89.4     median: 83.3 (14%)     max: 148 Watt
107.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.7     avg: 114.5     median: 116.2 (21%)     max: 166 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.1     avg: 13.3     median: 14.9 (10%)     max: 24.4 Watt
19.8 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.21     avg: 11.6     median: 11.9 (13%)     max: 20.1 Watt
11.7 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.9     avg: 23.5     median: 23.3 (17%)     max: 29.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700H → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 19:50:10

#0 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14721 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720115410 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14721 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 14721 +0.039s ... 0.053s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.001s ... 0.053s

#12 got single benchmarks 17942 +0.003s ... 0.056s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.1s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.1s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)