Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U vs Intel Core i9-13950HX

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7545U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U is a fast mid-range laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 6 cores (hexa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 3.2 (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 6 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Thanks to the new Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds, the R5 7545U is clearly faster than the old Ryzen 5 6600U (Zen 3, 6 cores, 4.5 GHz). Compared to the similar 7640U, the 7545U offers a lower base clock and a slower iGPU. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 7540U, the 7545U offers a higher clocked GPU and uses the smaller Zen 4c cores for 4 of the 6 CPU cores.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 740M with 4 of the 12 CUs and 2.5 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs. The new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) is not included in the 7545U.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt (28 Watt default).

Intel Core i9-13950HX

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13950HX

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake-HX series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i9-13000K with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) clocked from 2.2 to 5.5 GHz (single core, all core boost 4.9 GHz) with HyperThreading and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading clocked from 1.6 to 4 GHz. The 13950HX is very similar to the Core i9-13980HX, but with vPro Enterprise support and a 100 MHz reduced boost of the P-cores.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX).

Performance

The average 13950HX in our database is in the same league as the i9-13980HX and the i9-13900HX while being noticeably faster than the Ryzen 9 7845HX, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very, very fast chip, as of mid 2023.

Thanks to its powerful cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 145 W, the MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US is among the fastest laptops built around the 13950HX that we know of.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption is 45 W while its Turbo power consumption isn't supposed to go over 157 W. Intel suggests the "base" power consumption should be set to 55 W, which laptop makers aren't really obliged to do. Most will go for a higher value to get better performance.

This i9 series processor is manufactured on Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7545UIntel Core i9-13950HX
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenamePhoenix (Zen4)Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7545U « 3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX « 1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4900 MHz1600 - 5500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB32 MB
L3 Cache16 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
2 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4c
24 / 32
8 x 5.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13950HX
53.4 pt (74%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24560     avg: 29352     median: 28681 (27%)     max: 33277 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1952     avg: 2067     median: 2096 (89%)     max: 2113 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 742     avg: 788     median: 801 (89%)     max: 816 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 8697     avg: 10973     median: 10919 (27%)     max: 12648 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3625     avg: 4565     median: 4529 (29%)     max: 5227 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 274     avg: 292.9     median: 297 (89%)     max: 303 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
60 Points (78%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (89%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11424 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
80693 Points (58%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 99351     avg: 115415     median: 116665 (67%)     max: 127295 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6445     avg: 6775     median: 6754 (81%)     max: 7064 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 26     avg: 30.7     median: 31 (54%)     max: 34.5 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 175     avg: 203.1     median: 196 (2%)     max: 254 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 100     avg: 112.4     median: 111 (1%)     max: 137 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3823     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4121 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
19311 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
322.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
79200 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19337     avg: 23708     median: 23960 (65%)     max: 27078 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
81602 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77857 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81621 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16332 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 31279     avg: 37843     median: 39372 (70%)     max: 42199 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 13744     avg: 15379     median: 14805 (62%)     max: 18867 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2890     avg: 2920     median: 2919.5 (79%)     max: 2949 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 15878     avg: 16928     median: 16927.5 (67%)     max: 17977 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1805     avg: 2013     median: 2043 (86%)     max: 2097 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16776     avg: 19501     median: 20036 (36%)     max: 21853 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1856     avg: 1979     median: 2006 (9%)     max: 2048 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16846     avg: 18847     median: 18486.5 (58%)     max: 21567 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 451     avg: 466.6     median: 468 (1%)     max: 478 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
103911 Points (91%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279     avg: 290.9     median: 291 (84%)     max: 302 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 306.3     median: 318.5 (66%)     max: 346 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1592     avg: 1950     median: 1964 (75%)     max: 2139 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 134.5     avg: 188.3     median: 205 (35%)     max: 223 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 145     avg: 212.8     median: 204 (37%)     max: 259 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 14.2     avg: 20     median: 15.5 (10%)     max: 35 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 18.5     median: 17 (19%)     max: 27.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 18.8     avg: 21.5     median: 21.4 (16%)     max: 25 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13950HX → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 21:32:16

#0 checking url part for id 16407 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14671 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720035136 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16407 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 16407 +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14671 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14671 +0.014s ... 0.027s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.025s ... 0.051s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)