Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U vs Intel Core i5-13450HX

AMD Ryzen 5 7545U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7545U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U is a fast mid-range laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 6 cores (hexa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 3.2 (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 6 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Thanks to the new Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds, the R5 7545U is clearly faster than the old Ryzen 5 6600U (Zen 3, 6 cores, 4.5 GHz). Compared to the similar 7640U, the 7545U offers a lower base clock and a slower iGPU. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 7540U, the 7545U offers a higher clocked GPU and uses the smaller Zen 4c cores for 4 of the 6 CPU cores.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 740M with 4 of the 12 CUs and 2.5 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs. The new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) is not included in the 7545U.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt (28 Watt default).

Intel Core i5-13450HX

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13450HX

The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a fast mid-range mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 4 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.4 GHz (base) up to 4.6 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.8 and 3.4 GHz. All cores can access the combined 20 MB L3 cache (compared to the 36 MB of the i9 models).

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 13450HX as of August 2023, we have tested several systems featuring the Core i5-12600K, a CPU with very similar specs (six P-cores mated to four E-cores, both running at insignificantly faster clock speeds than what the 13450HX has). Based on that, we expect the 13450HX to be 10% to 15% behind the Ryzen 7 7840HS and the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the system's cooling solution is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

The chip's "minimum assured" power consumption sits at 45 W. Its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to go over 157 W and its "base" power consumption is supposed to be around 55 W. Most laptop makers will probably go for a value much higher than 55 W to extract as much performance out of the chip as possible.

The i5-13450HX is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7545UIntel Core i5-13450HX
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenamePhoenix (Zen4)Raptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7545U « 3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX compare1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX compare1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4900 MHz1800 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
2 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
4 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4c
10 / 16
6 x 4.5 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP28 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13450HX
42.6 pt (59%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16575 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1766 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
680 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6489 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2427 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
251 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29.2 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9840 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58749 Points (43%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6830 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
61811 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5571 MIPS (67%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
141.7 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
324.6 fps (75%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.9 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
13.5 GB/s (35%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
387 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
196 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14017 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
402 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
21982 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82893 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19916 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
27595 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
12644 Points (53%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2448 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
12619 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1763 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12022 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7348 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
41034 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
531 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
281 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.7     avg: 134.8     median: 134.8 (23%)     max: 160.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 19.2     avg: 25.4     median: 25.4 (17%)     max: 31.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 11.5     avg: 14.8     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 18.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13450HX → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 29. 17:54:03

#0 checking url part for id 16407 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14673 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719676443 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 16407 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 16407 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14673 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14673 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.036s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)