Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7540U vs Intel Celeron N4500

AMD Ryzen 5 7540U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7540U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7540U is a fast mid-range laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 6 cores (hexa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (12 threads). The cores clock from 3.2 (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 6 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Thanks to the new Zen 4 architecture and higher clock speeds, the R5 7540U is clearly faster than the old Ryzen 5 6600U (Zen 3, 6 cores, 4.5 GHz). Compared to the similar 7640U, the 7540U offers a lower base clock and a slower iGPU.

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 740M with 4 of the 12 CUs and 2.5 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) is not included in the 7540U. The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 15 and 30 Watt (28 Watt default).

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7540UIntel Celeron N4500
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)Intel Jasper Lake
CodenamePhoenix (Zen4)Jasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z1 compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7545U compare3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7540U « 3.2 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4900 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB
L2 Cache6 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
2 / 2
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 03. 23:51:28

#0 checking url part for id 15027 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720043488 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15027 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 15027 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.041s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)