Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

AMD Ryzen 5 7530U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7530U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7530U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Cezanne generation. It is part of the second "Barcelo" refresh in early 2023 and offers 200 MHz higher boost clock for the CPU cores compared to the old Ryzen 5 5625U (but a slower base clock speed). The R5 7530U integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3 microarchitecture. The cores are clocked at 2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (single core boost) and support SMT for a total of 12 threads. The chip is manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC.

Performance

The average 7530U in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 5 5625U, Ryzen 7 4800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, Core i5-1335U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 37 W, the VivoBook 15X OLED M3504YA is among the fastest laptops built around the 7530U that we know of. It can be roughly 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 (now only called Radeon Graphics) integrated graphics card with 7 CUs at up to 2 GHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 16 MB level 3 cache (up from 8 MB at the 4800U) can be found on the chip.

Power consumption

This Ryzen has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the Power Limit 1).

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

AMD Ryzen 5 4680U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4680U

The AMD Ryzen 5 4680U is a semi-custom APU of the Renoir family designed for Microsoft devices. The 4680U integrates six CPU cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture clocked at 2.2 GHz (base) to 4 GHz (Boost) with SMT support for a total 12 threads. The two advantages a 4680U has over the older Ryzen 5 4600U are its higher base clock speed and a faster iGPU.

Architecture

The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact, AMD advertises a 2x performance per watt improvement over the 12 nm Ryzen 3000 mobile processors. The built-in dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip.

Just like the other mobile Ryzen 4000 CPUs, a 4680U supports PCI-Express 3.0. Please go to our Renoir processor hub page for additional information on the product family.

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 4700U and the Core i5-10500H, the latter being a much more power-hungry chip. This makes the Ryzen a more than decent CPU for most tasks, as of early 2022.

Graphics

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a DX 12 compatible Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics adapter with 7 CUs (448 unified shaders) at up to 1,500 MHz. The Vega iGPU will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos, but the newer AV1 codec will only be decoded via software. In terms of gaming, we are looking at an MX150-level performance. Pretty much all games released in 2020 can be played on low to medium settings in 720p on this graphics adapter.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop makers - Microsoft, in this case - are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Indeed, we saw the CPU consume roughly 23 watts when subjected to our usual stress testing routine.

The 7 nm TSMC process this Ryzen is built with makes for very decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7530UAMD Ryzen 7 4800UAMD Ryzen 5 4680U
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameBarcelo-U RefreshRenoir-U (Zen 2)Renoir-U (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-U (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U « 2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U « 2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz1800 - 4200 MHz2200 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB3 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 128 / 166 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketFP6FP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7530U
37 pt (51%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4680U
31.1 pt (43%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
83 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
455 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6931     avg: 8479     median: 8418.5 (8%)     max: 9347 Points
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
7073 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1371     avg: 1438     median: 1443 (61%)     max: 1470 Points
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
1163 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 528     avg: 561     median: 565 (63%)     max: 574 Points
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
451 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2833     avg: 3304     median: 3288 (8%)     max: 3655 Points
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
2478 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1289     avg: 1447     median: 1457.5 (9%)     max: 1599 Points
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
1291 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 213     avg: 229.5     median: 230.5 (69%)     max: 237 Points
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
170 Points (51%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.8 Points (23%)
15.6 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (53%)
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5690 Points (34%)
5301 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33649 Points (24%)
31826 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
99.5 s (1%)
248.6 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
8.2 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3881 Points (6%)
3576 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 32204     avg: 37957     median: 37983 (22%)     max: 42364 MIPS
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
32745 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5113     avg: 5328     median: 5339 (64%)     max: 5544 MIPS
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
4077 MIPS (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.17     avg: 10.3     median: 10.7 (19%)     max: 11.6 fps
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
7.7 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.2 GB/s (27%)
8.3 GB/s (22%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 583     avg: 694     median: 674 (9%)     max: 820 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 330     avg: 377.3     median: 362 (3%)     max: 469 Seconds
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
458 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
10.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.9 s (1%)
24.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
585 s (3%)
581 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
50726 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10189     avg: 11861     median: 12224 (33%)     max: 12926 Points
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
10051 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 75967     avg: 78857     median: 78857 (64%)     max: 81747 Points
58600 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
84092 Points (68%)
58705 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
87410 Points (74%)
67233 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9155     avg: 11259     median: 11233 (28%)     max: 12903 Points
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14264     avg: 18380     median: 19207 (34%)     max: 20296 Points
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
16642 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4384     avg: 5399     median: 5619 (24%)     max: 5891 Points
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
5067 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1913     avg: 1941     median: 1941 (52%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 6099     avg: 6500     median: 6500 (26%)     max: 6901 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1393     avg: 1464     median: 1479 (62%)     max: 1498 Points
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
1078 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5475     avg: 6121     median: 6390 (11%)     max: 6648 Points
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
5785 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1312     avg: 1377     median: 1376.5 (6%)     max: 1441 Points
1162 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6233     avg: 6397     median: 6396.5 (20%)     max: 6560 Points
7298 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 614     avg: 650     median: 629 (1%)     max: 770 ms
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
877 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
72262 Points (63%)
36619 Points (32%)
47184 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 183.4     avg: 205.6     median: 209 (60%)     max: 214 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 244     avg: 261.5     median: 264 (55%)     max: 272 Points
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
198 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1029     avg: 1228     median: 1231 (47%)     max: 1336 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 41.4     median: 41.8 (7%)     max: 52.5 Watt
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.2     avg: 47.1     median: 48.2 (9%)     max: 59.9 Watt
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 5.5     median: 6 (4%)     max: 7.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.25     avg: 6.5     median: 6.4 (7%)     max: 7.64 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 26.7     avg: 32     median: 28.8 (21%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7530U → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 92% n=19

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4680U → 83% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 00:00:56

#0 checking url part for id 14958 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13178 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719871256 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14958 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14958 +0.012s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.007s ... 0.032s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13178 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#12 got single benchmarks 13178 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.095s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)