Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U vs Intel Core i7-1265U

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7520U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.8 GHz (base) to 4.3 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.).

The integrated graphics adapter (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

Performance

The average 7520U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i7-1185G7, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and indicative of a lower mid-range chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Mendocino series chips are produced on a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R5 7520U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

Intel Core i7-1265U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1265U

The Intel Core i7-1265U is a high-end mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.8 to 4.8 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.3 to 3.6 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. The 1265U offers "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the 10 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older quad-core Tiger Lake CPUs with 15 Watt (like the Intel Core i7-1160G7). The sustained performance will be limited by the TDP setting and thermals and therefore only short term loads. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the big Golden Cove cores, the single thread performance should be better than similar clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers all 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7520UIntel Core i7-1265U
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)Intel Alder Lake-M
CodenameMendocino-U (Zen 2)Alder Lake-U
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U « 2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4300 MHz1300 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB928 KB
L2 Cache2 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
FeaturesLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7520U
28.8 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1265U
37.8 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5149 Points (5%)
min: 4332     avg: 7486     median: 8225 (8%)     max: 9219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1171 Points (50%)
min: 1144     avg: 1595     median: 1679.5 (71%)     max: 1820 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 250     avg: 350.5     median: 350.5 (39%)     max: 451 Points
min: 528     avg: 619     median: 642 (71%)     max: 701 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1281     avg: 1633     median: 1632.5 (4%)     max: 1984 Points
min: 1669     avg: 2884     median: 3214.5 (8%)     max: 3584 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
834 Points (5%)
min: 706     avg: 1244     median: 1344.5 (8%)     max: 1572 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
168.8 Points (51%)
min: 165.3     avg: 229.7     median: 240 (72%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
16.5 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8549 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38152 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60266 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13904 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
217.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5960 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
24219 MIPS (14%)
min: 20087     avg: 32344     median: 34399 (20%)     max: 38715 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4167 MIPS (50%)
min: 4614     avg: 5198     median: 5285.5 (63%)     max: 5617 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
81 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
265.5 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.3 fps (11%)
min: 5.09     avg: 8.6     median: 9.2 (16%)     max: 10.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.7 GB/s (25%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1044 Seconds (13%)
min: 684     avg: 887     median: 834 (11%)     max: 1326 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
588 Seconds (4%)
min: 364     avg: 465.9     median: 423.5 (3%)     max: 684 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
min: 0.4666     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.578 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7351     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (20%)     max: 11516 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.5 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 26635     avg: 35503     median: 35502.5 (31%)     max: 44370 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7743 Points (21%)
min: 7560     avg: 11888     median: 11716 (32%)     max: 16290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58709 Points (48%)
63003 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58852 Points (48%)
63619 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67580 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5521 Points (14%)
min: 5667     avg: 9450     median: 10255 (26%)     max: 12375 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
11558 Points (21%)
min: 8745     avg: 14302     median: 14659 (26%)     max: 18414 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3442 Points (15%)
min: 3482     avg: 5221     median: 5352.5 (23%)     max: 6837 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1066 Points (45%)
min: 1429     avg: 1697     median: 1739.5 (73%)     max: 1806 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3821 Points (7%)
min: 5022     avg: 7709     median: 8127 (15%)     max: 8981 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1489     avg: 1648     median: 1678 (7%)     max: 1700 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6992     avg: 8211     median: 8305.5 (26%)     max: 8917 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7515 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33057 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
min: 542     avg: 572     median: 553 (1%)     max: 636 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 68050     avg: 75259     median: 73251 (64%)     max: 84477 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
155.3 Points (45%)
min: 198.4     avg: 233.9     median: 242.5 (70%)     max: 250 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
191.3 Points (40%)
min: 221     avg: 268.4     median: 279.5 (58%)     max: 288 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
960 Points (37%)
min: 1301     avg: 1540     median: 1593.5 (61%)     max: 1623 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.5 Watt (6%)
min: 20.8     avg: 41.8     median: 42.8 (7%)     max: 63 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37 Watt (7%)
min: 25.2     avg: 48.6     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 72.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.8 Watt (2%)
min: 3.54     avg: 6.8     median: 6.5 (4%)     max: 12.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.67     avg: 5     median: 4.6 (5%)     max: 6.61 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
22.5 Points per Watt (17%)
min: 18.3     avg: 25.8     median: 26.1 (19%)     max: 30.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7520U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1265U → 145% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 21:51:28

#0 checking url part for id 14609 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14072 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720122688 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14609 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 got single benchmarks 14609 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14072 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 14072 +0.015s ... 0.034s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.076s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.078s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)