Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U vs Intel Pentium 8500

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 7520U

The AMD Ryzen 5 7520U is a mobile processor for cheap laptops of the Mendocino series. It integrates four older Zen 2 cores (similar to the Ryzen 4000 series like the Ryzen 3 4300U). The CPU cores clock from 2.8 GHz (base) to 4.3 GHz (single core Turbo) and can use 4 MB L3 cache. Thanks to SMT/Hyperthreading, the CPU can work on 8 threads simultaneously. The integrated memory controller only supports fast LPDDR5 memory (5500 MHz max.).

The integrated graphics adapter (Radeon 610M iGPU) uses the modern RDNA 2 architecture, but only 2 CUs (128 shaders) and clocks with up to 1.9 GHz.

Performance

The average 7520U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i7-1185G7, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and indicative of a lower mid-range chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Mendocino series chips are produced on a relatively modern 6nm FinFET process at TSMC and should offer a good power efficiency. The R5 7520U is rated at 8-15 W TDP and therefore well suited for thin and light laptops.

Intel Pentium 8500

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 8500

The Intel Pentium 8500 is an entry-level low-power mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers one performance core (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 4 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 6 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.7 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 8 MB L3-cache. Compared to the faster Core i3-1210U, the Pentium offers one less P-core.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 8500 as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be about 20% slower than the i3-1215U, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. Which is pretty terrible as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 48 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 0.8 GHz.

Power consumption

This Pentium has a Base power consumption of 9 W, with 29 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption. TDP values this low allow for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs as long as performance is not a priority.

The CPU is made with Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7520UIntel Pentium 8500
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)Intel Alder Lake-M
CodenameMendocino-U (Zen 2)Alder Lake-U
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U « 2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 « 0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4300 MHz700 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB464 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 85 / 6
TDP15 Watt9 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
FeaturesLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHALPDDR4x-4266/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 7520U
28.8 pt (40%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5149 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1171 Points (50%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 250     avg: 350.5     median: 350.5 (39%)     max: 451 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1281     avg: 1633     median: 1632.5 (4%)     max: 1984 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
834 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
168.8 Points (51%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
24219 MIPS (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4167 MIPS (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.3 fps (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1044 Seconds (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
588 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58709 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
58852 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
5521 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
11558 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3442 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1066 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3821 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
155.3 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
191.3 Points (40%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
960 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
37 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
22.5 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 7520U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 21:46:57

#0 checking url part for id 14609 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14114 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720122417 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14609 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 14609 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14114 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 14114 +0s ... 0.008s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.008s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.015s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.017s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)