Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H vs Intel Core i5-9400H

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 6600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R5 6600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. 

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6600H only offers the slower Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock speed.

Performance

The average 6600H in our database is in the same league as the R7 5825U, the R7 6800U and also the Core i5-1340P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very decent result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a system built around such a chip.

The R5 6600H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-9400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-9400H

The Intel Core i5-9400H is a high-end processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.3 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-8400H from 2018, the 9300H is only clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz CPU Turbo, +50 MHz GPU).

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-9400H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-9750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-9400H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early price list information (e.g. by Intel or on Baidu).

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 6600HIntel Core i5-9400H
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Coffee Lake
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Coffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H « 3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H « 2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4500 MHz2500 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FCBGA1440
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 6600H
38.2 pt (53%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10226     avg: 10472     median: 10471.5 (10%)     max: 10717 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1458 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 564     avg: 570     median: 569.5 (63%)     max: 575 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3965     avg: 4053     median: 4053 (10%)     max: 4141 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1626     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (11%)     max: 1740 Points
823 Points (5%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 231     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (70%)     max: 236 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.4 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39886     avg: 43861     median: 43861 (25%)     max: 47836 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5466     avg: 5510     median: 5509.5 (66%)     max: 5553 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.5     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 14.2 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 508     avg: 520     median: 520 (7%)     max: 532 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 291     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.502     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.532 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12022 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12692 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20214     avg: 20733     median: 20733 (37%)     max: 21252 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6569     avg: 6796     median: 6796 (29%)     max: 7023 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2042 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9240 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1446     avg: 1460     median: 1460 (62%)     max: 1474 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403     avg: 7066     median: 7066 (13%)     max: 7729 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1417 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6219 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 637     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (1%)     max: 670 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
209 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 246.5     median: 246.5 (51%)     max: 260 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1399 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.8 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
90.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 6600H → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-9400H → 49% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:06:01

#0 checking url part for id 14086 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11354 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719932761 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14086 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 14086 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11354 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 11354 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.031s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.037s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.037s

#15 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)