Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

AMD Ryzen 5 6600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 6600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 6600H is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R5 6600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.5 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. 

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

In the 6000 series, AMD finally switched to the current RDNA 2 graphics architecture for the iGPU. The 6600H only offers the slower Radeon 660M with 6 of the 12 CUs enabled and 1.9 GHz max. clock speed.

Performance

The average 6600H in our database is in the same league as the R7 5825U, the R7 6800U and also the Core i5-1340P, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very decent result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series APU has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. A high-performance cooling solution is a must for a system built around such a chip.

The R5 6600H is built with TSMC's 6 nm process for great, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 6600HIntel Xeon E-2276M
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)Intel Coffee Lake
CodenameRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)Coffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H « 3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock3300 - 4500 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 6600H
38.2 pt (53%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
34.1 pt (47%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10226     avg: 10472     median: 10471.5 (10%)     max: 10717 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1458 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 564     avg: 570     median: 569.5 (63%)     max: 575 Points
484 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3965     avg: 4053     median: 4053 (10%)     max: 4141 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1626     avg: 1683     median: 1683 (11%)     max: 1740 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 231     avg: 233.5     median: 233.5 (70%)     max: 236 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (59%)     max: 201 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39886     avg: 43861     median: 43861 (25%)     max: 47836 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5466     avg: 5510     median: 5509.5 (66%)     max: 5553 MIPS
5214 MIPS (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.5     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 14.2 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 508     avg: 520     median: 520 (7%)     max: 532 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 291     avg: 298.5     median: 298.5 (2%)     max: 306 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.502     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.532 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12022 Points (32%)
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (34%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12692 Points (32%)
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20214     avg: 20733     median: 20733 (37%)     max: 21252 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6569     avg: 6796     median: 6796 (29%)     max: 7023 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2042 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
9240 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1446     avg: 1460     median: 1460 (62%)     max: 1474 Points
1303 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6403     avg: 7066     median: 7066 (13%)     max: 7729 Points
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1417 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6219 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2276M +
24150 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 637     avg: 654     median: 653.5 (1%)     max: 670 ms
784 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E-2276M +
56114 Points (49%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
209 Points (60%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 233     avg: 246.5     median: 246.5 (51%)     max: 260 Points
220 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1399 Points (54%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.8 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
90.4 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 6600H → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 87% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 17:14:04

#0 checking url part for id 14086 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719933244 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14086 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 14086 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.005s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.039s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.039s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.047s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#15 return log +0.002s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)