Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Intel Core i5-1245U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

Intel Core i5-1245U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1245U

The Intel Core i5-1245U is a mid-range mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.6 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.2 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache. Compared to the i7-1265U (fastest U-series CPU at launch), the 1245U offers lower clock speeds, a slower iGPU, but the full "Enterprise" vPro management features. Compared to the P-series (28W) or H-series (45W), the 15W TDP may limit the sustained performance.

Performance

Thanks to the 10 cores, the multi-threaded performance should be clearly faster than the older quad-core Tiger Lake CPUs with 15 Watt (like the Intel Core i7-1160G7). The sustained performance will be limited by the TDP setting and thermals and therefore only short term loads. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the big Golden Cove cores, the single thread performance should be better than similar clocked Tiger Lake CPUs.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.2 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 15 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 55 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UIntel Core i5-1245U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-M
CodenameZen+Alder Lake-U
Series: Alder Lake-M Alder Lake-U
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U compare1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U « 1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U compare0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U compare0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8505 compare0.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 8500 compare0.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7305 compare0.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 7300 compare0.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz1200 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB928 KB
L2 Cache2 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 410 / 12
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology12 nm10 nm
SocketAM4BGA1744
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vProe Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1245U
37.8 pt (52%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
8199 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1690 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
649 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3153 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (3%)
1311 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (38%)
242 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (7%)
16.2 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (36%)
2.9 Points (73%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8303 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
37663 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (16%)
61863 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (8%)
13501 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
229.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
5.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6154 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
35918 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5097 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
78.4 fps (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
263 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.2 GB/s (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
712 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
388 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12162 Points (26%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
442.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
44705 Points (39%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (15%)
16005 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63413 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
65043 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74670 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
12073 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (12%)
18467 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6185 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1675 Points (71%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9065 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1585 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8911 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7065 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33040 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
575 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
240 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
271 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1577 Points (60%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.4 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.7 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.9 Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1245U → 254% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 02. 14:43:33

#0 checking url part for id 11336 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14076 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719924213 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11336 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 11336 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14076 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 14076 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.047s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)