Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Intel Core i5-1240U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

Intel Core i5-1240U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1240U

The Intel Core i5-1240U is a mobile CPU for thin and light laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 2  performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 12 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 1.1 to 4.4 GHz on the performance cluster and 0.8 to 3.3 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 12 MB L3 cache.  Compared to the similar Core i7-1260U, the 1240U offers lower clocked CPU cores, a slower iGPU, but the same "Enterprise" vPro management features.

Performance

Compared to the old 7 Watt Comet Lake-Y series (like the i7-10510Y), the performance should be clearly better thanks to the 10 cores and the improved architecture of the P-cores. Compared to the 15 W U-series (like the similar specified Core i5-1245U) the sustained performance will be clearly limited by the 9 Watt TDP. As always, the performance will also greatly depend on the cooling solution, especially for fanless laptops and tablets.

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 80 of the 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 0.9 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 9 W base power (TDP, PL1) and 29 W max. Turbo power (PL2) and the whole SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 3700U

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a mobile SoC for business laptops that was announced in April 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.3 - 4 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics card with 10 CUs (640 Shaders) clocked at up to 1400 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 7 3700U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U should be slightly ahead the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300UIntel Core i5-1240UAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Alder Lake-MAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Alder Lake-UZen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1265U1.3 - 4.8 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1255U1.2 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1245U1.2 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1235U0.9 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1250U0.8 - 4.7 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240U « 0.8 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1230U0.7 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1215U0.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85050.9 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1210U0.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 8 cores10 MB L3
Intel Pentium 85000.7 - 4.4 GHz5 / 6 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73050.9 - 1.1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
Intel Celeron 73000.7 - 1 GHz5 / 5 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U « 2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz800 - 4400 MHz2300 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB928 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB9.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB12 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 410 / 124 / 8
TDP15 Watt9 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm10 nm12 nm
SocketAM4BGA1781AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTLPDDR4x-4266/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TMEXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1240U
35.3 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
7902 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1559 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
596 Points (66%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2990 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (3%)
1242 Points (8%)
658 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (38%)
226 Points (68%)
149 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.5 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
22657 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6410 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
31097 MIPS (18%)
16735 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4446 MIPS (53%)
3680 MIPS (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
9.1 fps (16%)
3.6 fps (6%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
744 Seconds (9%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
407 Seconds (3%)
785 Seconds (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (15%)
12746 Points (34%)
6539 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
10240 Points (26%)
2098 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (12%)
15715 Points (28%)
9338 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6274 Points (26%)
2706 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1596 Points (67%)
808 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7066 Points (13%)
3018 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1547 Points (7%)
839 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7029 Points (22%)
3091 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3928 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
11249 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
659 ms (1%)
1278 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
27979 Points (25%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
221 Points (64%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
266 Points (55%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1363 Points (52%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.9 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
6.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
27.1 Points per Watt (20%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1240U → 226% n=5

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U → 113% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 04. 16:57:47

#0 checking url part for id 11336 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14108 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11332 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720105067 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11336 +0s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 11336 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14108 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 14108 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11332 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#12 got single benchmarks 11332 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.04s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)