Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U vs Intel Core i3-330M vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

AMD Ryzen 3 3350U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3350U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3350U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar Ryzen 3 3300U, the 3350U offers the same specifications according to AMD.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3350U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

Intel Core i3-330M

► remove from comparison Intel 330M

The Intel Core i3-330M is a lower-middle class dual core CPU for laptops and clocks with 2.16 GHz. The difference to the Core i5-430M is the lacking Turbo Boost overclocking and the slower core speed. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). 

A feature of the new Core i3-330M is the integrated graphics card called Intel HD Graphics or GMA HD and a DDR3 1066 MHz memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process. 

The performance in synthetic benchmarks is mostly on par with a 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo P8600 (due to the improved hyperthreading). The speed should be at least as fast as a 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo and therefore the i3-330M positions itself in the middle class (lower middle class regarding Core i CPUs). It should handle all applications well, but some demanding games could profit from a faster CPU.

The 32nm cpu cores of the Westmere generation can also process some new instructions to accelerate AES encryptions. In the i3-330M Intel has deactivated these new AES functions.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. The Core i5 and i7 models should still be a bit faster because of the higher max. clock speed of the GPU. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone).

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 PRO 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. Compared to the similar consumer variant Ryzen 3 3300U, the PRO model features additional management and security features (e.g., full memory encryption) and longer warranty / availability.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows for higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 3350UIntel Core i3-330MAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Core i3AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+ArrandaleZen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-390M2.67 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380M2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-370M2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-350M2.26 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330M « 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-380UM1.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-330UM1.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2100 - 3500 MHz2130 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB3 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt35 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million177+382 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm32 nm, 0.775 - 1 V (low frequency mode) 0.8 - 1.4 V12 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 (rPGA) -100 (BGA) °C
SocketAM4BGA1288, PGA988AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTHyper Threading, Enhanced Speedstep, integrated GMA HD 500MHz, integrated DDR3 1066 memory controllerXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
FSB2500
Die Size81+114 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
481 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
126 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 330M +
min: 1.71     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.77 Points
5.5 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.4 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 330M +
min: 1671     avg: 2301     median: 2330 (14%)     max: 2360 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 330M +
min: 5361     avg: 5513     median: 5491 (4%)     max: 6333 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 330M +
min: 6254     avg: 6557     median: 6552 (5%)     max: 6756 Points
22657 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 330M +
min: 1932     avg: 2779     median: 2863 (3%)     max: 2931 Points
6410 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 330M +
min: 477     avg: 854     median: 750 (9%)     max: 2357 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 330M +
min: 23     avg: 27.3     median: 24 (5%)     max: 64 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 330M +
min: 1906     avg: 2210     median: 2230 (5%)     max: 2280 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 330M +
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 330M +
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 69 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 330M +
min: 1097     avg: 1158     median: 1104 (5%)     max: 1810 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 330M +
min: 25565     avg: 27250     median: 26000 (12%)     max: 31260 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 330M +
min: 20210     avg: 20478     median: 20300 (16%)     max: 22700 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 330M +
min: 4624     avg: 5352     median: 5107 (11%)     max: 5958 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 330M +
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.2 (79%)     max: 6.2 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 330M +
min: 5043     avg: 6073     median: 6143 (5%)     max: 6244 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
5408 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
4646 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
6596 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
864 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2455 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3350U → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-330M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 03. 20:14:10

#0 checking url part for id 13237 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 537 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11336 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720030450 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13237 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 13237 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 537 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 537 +0.038s ... 0.05s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11336 +0.001s ... 0.051s

#12 got single benchmarks 11336 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.067s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)