Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 vs Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

NVIDIA Quadro P3000

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000

The Nvidia Quadro P3000 is a mobile high-end workstation graphics card for notebooks. Similar to the consumer GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), it is based on the GP106 chip with 1280 shaders. The graphics card is designed for the Kaby Lake generation and is the successor to the Quadro M3000M (Maxwell). However, the P3000 is equipped with 6 GB GDDR5 video memory (at a lower bandwidth), while GTX 1060 is available with 3 or 6 GB. The clock rates range from 1088 MHz (base) to 1215 MHz (typical Boost) to 1240 MHz (max.).

The Quadro GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

Performance

The theoretical performance should be on par with the GTX 1060 (if the clocks did not take a massive hit), so the GPU should be significantly faster than the previous M3000M.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Quadro P3000 is 75 Watts TGP (including memory) or 55.3 W TDP according to Nvidia, so the card is suited for 15-inch notebooks or larger.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation, not to be confused with the A500, P500 and the T500, is a lower-end professional graphics card for use in laptops that sports 2,048 CUDA cores and a paltry 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. We believe this graphics card to be a heavily cut-down GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop; therefore, both should employ the Ada Lovelace AD107 chip built with TSMC's 5 nm process. The RTX 500 was launched in February 2024. The Nvidia-recommended TGP range for this graphics card is moderately wide at 35 W to 60 W leading to noticeable performance differences between different systems powered by what is supposed to be the same graphics card.

Quadro series graphics cards ship with much different BIOS and drivers than GeForce cards and are targeted at professional users rather than gamers. Commercial product design, large-scale calculations, simulation, data mining, 24 x 7 operation, certified drivers - if any of this sounds familiar, then a Quadro card will make you happy.

Architecture and Features

Ada Lovelace brings a range of improvements over older graphics cards utilizing the outgoing Ampere architecture. It's not just a better manufacturing process and a higher number of CUDA cores that we have here; under-the-hood refinements are plentiful, including an immensely larger L2 cache, an optimized ray tracing routine (a different way to determine what is transparent and what isn't is used), and other changes. Naturally, these graphics cards can both encode and decode some of the most widely used video codecs, AVC, HEVC and AV1 included; they also support a host of proprietary Nvidia technologies, including Optimus and DLSS 3, and they can certainly be used for various AI applications.

The RTX 500 Ada features 16 RT cores of the 3rd generation, 64 Tensor cores of the 4th generation and 2,048 CUDA cores. Increase those numbers by 25%, and you get the RTX 1000 Ada - as long as we pay no attention to clock speed differences, of course. Unlike costlier Ada Generation professional laptop graphics cards, the RTX 500 comes with just 4 GB of non-ECC VRAM; the lack of error correction makes this card less suitable for super-important tasks and round-the-clock operation. The VRAM is just 64-bit wide, delivering an anemic bandwidth of ~128 GB/s.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation makes use of the PCI-Express 4 protocol, just like Ampere-based cards did. 8K SUHD monitors are supported, however, DP 1.4a video outputs may prove to be a bottleneck down the line.

Performance

While we are yet to test a single laptop powered by the RTX 500 Ada as of late February, it's realistic to expect it to be just a little slower than the average RTX 3050 Laptop. Yes, that's right; the RTX 500 has no chance of matching the RTX 4050 Laptop in sheer performance due to the reduced core count and smaller memory bus. Nvidia's marketing materials mention "up to 9.2 TFLOPS" of performance, a significant downgrade compared to 12.1 TFLOPS delivered by the RTX 1000 Ada.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the TGP power target of the RTX 500 Ada is.

Power consumption

Nvidia no longer divides its laptop graphics cards into Max-Q and non-max-Q models. Instead, laptop makers are free to set the TGP according to their needs, and the range can sometimes be shockingly wide. The RTX 500 Ada got luckier than many, as the lowest value recommended for it sits at 35 W while the highest value is 60 W (this most likely includes Dynamic Boost). Real-world performance of the slowest RTX 500 Ada will probably be around 40% lower than that of the fastest one.

Last but not the least, the improved 5 nm process (TSMC 4N) the RTX 500 Ada is built with makes for decent energy efficiency, as of early 2024.

NVIDIA Quadro P3000Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX Ada Generation Laptop GPU Series
Quadro P5200 compare 2560 @ 1.32 - 1.57 GHz256 Bit @ 7216 MHz
Quadro P4200 compare 2304 @ 1.22 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 7132 MHz
Quadro P5000 compare 2048 @ 1.16 - 1.51 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P5000 Max-Q compare 2048 @ 1.1 - 1.37 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 compare 1792 @ 1.2 - 1.23 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P4000 Max-Q compare 1792 @ 1.11 - 1.24 GHz256 Bit @ 6006 MHz
Quadro P3200 compare 1792 @ 0.71 - 1.23 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 1280 @ 1.09 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P3000 Max-Q compare 1280 @ 1.08 - 1.24 GHz192 Bit @ 7008 MHz
Quadro P2000 compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P2000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 1.22 - 1.47 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P1000 compare 512 @ 1.49 - 1.52 GHz128 Bit @ 6008 MHz
Quadro P620 compare 512 @ 1.18 - 1.44 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 0.93 - 1.68 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 7424 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 5120 192 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 4608 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 3072 128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU compare 2560 96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU 2048 64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
CodenameN17E-Q1
ArchitecturePascalAda Lovelace
Pipelines1280 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed1088 - 1215 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7008 MHz12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption75 Watt60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP)
technology16 nm5 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement11.01.2017 27.02.2024
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comimages.nvidia.com
TMUs64
ROPs32
Raytracing Cores16
Tensor / AI Cores64
Memory Bandwidth128 GB/s
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro P3000
4.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
2999 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2864 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 316202     avg: 331998     median: 331998 (38%)     max: 347794 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
121766 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 24508     avg: 24681     median: 24681 (26%)     max: 24854 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 61574     avg: 63332     median: 63331.5 (17%)     max: 65089 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8003     avg: 8156     median: 8155.5 (14%)     max: 8308 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 9022     avg: 9256     median: 9255.5 (10%)     max: 9489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
126996 Points (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 10738     avg: 11351     median: 11229 (16%)     max: 12086 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 11162     avg: 12583     median: 12105 (10%)     max: 14483 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
33390 Points (10%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
36405 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
3DMark 06
29440 Points (38%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
50.9 fps (17%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
51.2 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
50.6 fps (29%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
54.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
19.5 fps (23%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
57.6 fps (43%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
56.3 fps (60%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
59.3 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
50.3 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 102.9     avg: 117.4     median: 107.3 (27%)     max: 141.9 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 71.8     avg: 88.2     median: 73.3 (11%)     max: 119.4 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.8 (12%)     max: 55.3 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 29.32     avg: 33.1     median: 29.8 (8%)     max: 40.22 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 64.6     avg: 72.8     median: 67.7 (18%)     max: 86.1 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 7.6     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (7%)     max: 8.78 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 85.6     avg: 93.2     median: 87 (35%)     max: 107.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 92.3     avg: 104.1     median: 96.5 (16%)     max: 123.6 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 5873     avg: 6514     median: 6835 (5%)     max: 6835 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 92.3     avg: 101.1     median: 96 (33%)     max: 114.9 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 100.7     avg: 128.2     median: 113.4 (7%)     max: 170.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
165.8 fps (19%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
249.9 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
328.6 fps (19%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
712 fps (6%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1805     avg: 1815     median: 1814.5 (8%)     max: 1824 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 3317     avg: 3352     median: 3351.5 (6%)     max: 3386 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6501     avg: 6556     median: 6556 (7%)     max: 6611 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
82.7 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
84.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 89.1     avg: 101.8     median: 101.8 (22%)     max: 114.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.2972     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (30%)     max: 0.3704 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (31%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 35.8     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (62%)     max: 41.6 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro P3000 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Prey

Prey

2017
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
89.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
41.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
28.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
25.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
9.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
107.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
53.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
48.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
26  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
19.5  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
199.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
87.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
81.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
57.3  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
24.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
120.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
114.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
79.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
68.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
30.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
143.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
136.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
66.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
53.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
21.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
165.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
139.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
68.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
60.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
25.1  fps
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
36.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
103.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
77.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
43.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
22.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
14.5  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
89.9  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
73  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
47.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
176.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
107  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
59.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
50.3 53.6 ~ 52 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
21  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
278.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
189.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
107.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
78.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
34.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
180.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
156.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
82.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
70.3  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
27.4  fps
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
51.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
73  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
49  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
167.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
103.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
59.1 66 ~ 63 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
31.2 33 34 ~ 33 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
21.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
233.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
129.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
80.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
71.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro P3000:
61.8  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
65  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
67.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro P3000:
231.9 291.2 ~ 262 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
203.7 242.1 ~ 223 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro P3000:
184.7 233.2 ~ 209 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro P3000:
89.8 92.1 107.9 ~ 97 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro P3000 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro P3000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey89.3
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III8441.228.725.49.6
Ghost Recon Wildlands107.753.748.42619.5
For Honor199.787.181.657.324.8
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare120.8114.279.968.730.9
Titanfall 2143.8136.866.353.921.1
Battlefield 1165.8139.568.760.625.1
Mafia 336.5
Deus Ex Mankind Divided103.777.643.322.914.5
Overwatch89.9
Doom73
Ashes of the Singularity52.547.8
Rise of the Tomb Raider176.410759.45221
Rainbow Six Siege278.2189.5107.378.834.9
Star Wars Battlefront180.9156.482.570.327.4
Fallout 451.9
Metal Gear Solid V60
Batman: Arkham Knight7349
The Witcher 3167.2103.6633321.8
Dirt Rally233.9129.880.771.661.8
Thief65
Metro: Last Light67.5
BioShock Infinite26222320997
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
10

3
5
6
1
5
9
1
3
6
12



9
2
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 04. 23:38:22

#0 checking url part for id 7665 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12426 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720129102 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Jul 2024 05:15:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.052s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7665 +0.021s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 7665 +0.006s ... 0.079s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12426 +0s ... 0.08s

#10 got single benchmarks 12426 +0s ... 0.08s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.099s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.099s

#14 Got 85 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.103s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.103s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.104s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.112s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.112s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.113s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)