Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N6005 vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Intel Pentium Silver N6005

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6005

The Intel Pentium Silver N6005 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktop and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6005 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 900 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0 / 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6005 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is enough to enjoy Web browsing and watch videos online without noticeable slowdowns, as of mid 2023 - which is what most consumers want.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 15 W, the Intel NUC11ATKPE is among the fastest systems built around the N6005 that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (versus the 6 W of the mobile N6000). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 PRO 7940HS

The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a fast high-end laptop processor of the Phoenix series. It offers 8 cores (octa core) based on the Zen 4 architecture that supports hyperthreading (16 threads). The cores clock from 4 (base) up to 5.2 GHz (single core boost). The processor includes 8 MB L2 cache and 16 MB L3 cache.

Compared to the consumer Ryzen 9 7940HS, the PRO models offer additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments.

The performance of the R9 PRO 7940HS should be slightly higher than the old top model Ryzen 9 6980HX (8 Zen 3 cores with up to 4.9 GHz) at 54W TDP and Ryzen 9 6980HS at 35W TDP. Compared to the higher end Dragon Range series, the 7940HS should be similar to the Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W tDP, 32 MB L3).

The chip integrates a modern and fasts RDNA 3 graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.8 GHz clock speed. Furthermore, the Phoenix series include a video engine with AV1 de- and encoding, a new Xilinx FPGA based XDNA AI accelerator (Ryzen AI) that should be faster than the AI engine in the Apple M2 SOC and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support). The connectivity features includes 2 possible USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes for a GPU and SSDs.

The Phoenix series uses a single monolithic design (unlike the chiplet design of the 7045HX series) and is manufactured in the modern 4nm process at TSMC. The TDP can be configured between 35 and 45 Watt.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N6005AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
CodenameJasper LakePhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Series: Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 « 2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 3300 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1338FP7/FP8
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (450 - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6005
22.7 pt (31%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 PRO 7940HS
44.1 pt (61%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1525     avg: 1944     median: 1833 (2%)     max: 2475 Points
min: 14919     avg: 15603     median: 14953 (14%)     max: 16938 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 624     avg: 671     median: 694 (30%)     max: 696 Points
min: 1568     avg: 1708     median: 1762 (75%)     max: 1794 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 239     avg: 255.7     median: 262 (29%)     max: 266 Points
min: 611     avg: 665     median: 689 (77%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 584     avg: 751     median: 720 (2%)     max: 948 Points
min: 5790     avg: 6068     median: 5812 (14%)     max: 6601 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 267     avg: 338     median: 319 (2%)     max: 428 Points
min: 2356     avg: 2478     median: 2360 (15%)     max: 2718 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 107     avg: 117     median: 121 (36%)     max: 123 Points
min: 247     avg: 267.3     median: 275 (83%)     max: 280 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.14     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 5.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.47     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (37%)     max: 1.48 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3776     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (24%)     max: 4164 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 10619     avg: 12496     median: 12496 (9%)     max: 14373 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 15504     avg: 17871     median: 17871 (12%)     max: 20238 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 6163     avg: 6168     median: 6167.5 (8%)     max: 6172 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 493.256     avg: 554     median: 554.1 (7%)     max: 615 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.004     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.09 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1525     avg: 1675     median: 1674.5 (3%)     max: 1824 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 9367     avg: 10727     median: 9964 (6%)     max: 12851 MIPS
min: 61111     avg: 63409     median: 61303 (35%)     max: 67813 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3425     avg: 3468     median: 3465 (41%)     max: 3515 MIPS
min: 5844     avg: 6185     median: 6215 (74%)     max: 6497 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 21.6     avg: 25.2     median: 25.2 (9%)     max: 28.75 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 102     avg: 118.8     median: 118.8 (27%)     max: 135.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.65     avg: 1.9     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 2.34 fps
min: 17     avg: 18.2     median: 17.3 (30%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.219     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (7%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2464 Seconds (31%)
min: 305     avg: 331     median: 343 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1354     avg: 1730     median: 1805 (13%)     max: 2032 Seconds
min: 191     avg: 206.7     median: 214 (2%)     max: 215 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.073     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (25%)     max: 1.171 sec
min: 0.4462     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4835 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 4881     avg: 5451     median: 5451 (12%)     max: 6021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.564     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (4%)     max: 17.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39.14     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (2%)     max: 39.333 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 866     avg: 881     median: 880.6 (4%)     max: 895.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10338     avg: 12077     median: 12076.5 (11%)     max: 13815 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3659     avg: 4342     median: 4341.5 (12%)     max: 5024 Points
min: 17734     avg: 19358     median: 18994.5 (51%)     max: 21708 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25277     avg: 36490     median: 36489.5 (30%)     max: 47702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 27534     avg: 37546     median: 37545.5 (30%)     max: 47557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 37549     avg: 46388     median: 46388 (39%)     max: 55227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2945     avg: 3737     median: 3737 (9%)     max: 4529 Points
min: 18622     avg: 18646     median: 18646 (47%)     max: 18670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4295     avg: 5349     median: 5349 (10%)     max: 6403 Points
min: 24750     avg: 25817     median: 25765.5 (46%)     max: 26986 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1956 Points (8%)
min: 8500     avg: 9183     median: 9056.5 (38%)     max: 10117 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
578 Points (16%)
min: 2339     avg: 2519     median: 2605 (70%)     max: 2614 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
1332 Points (5%)
min: 10095     avg: 11157     median: 10348 (41%)     max: 13028 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 606     avg: 680     median: 695 (29%)     max: 738 Points
min: 1758     avg: 1894     median: 1956 (83%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1578     avg: 1884     median: 1673 (3%)     max: 2402 Points
min: 9897     avg: 10631     median: 9959 (18%)     max: 12038 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 603     avg: 659     median: 680 (3%)     max: 694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1313     avg: 1768     median: 1537 (5%)     max: 2455 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2555     avg: 2878     median: 2764 (28%)     max: 3314 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5097     avg: 6641     median: 5399 (6%)     max: 9426 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1396     avg: 1443     median: 1417 (2%)     max: 1516 ms
min: 532     avg: 547     median: 546 (1%)     max: 564 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
77466 Points (68%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104.2 Points (30%)
min: 229     avg: 247     median: 252 (72%)     max: 255 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 142.3     avg: 145.1     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
min: 279     avg: 296.7     median: 296 (62%)     max: 315 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
539 Points (21%)
min: 1423     avg: 1538     median: 1555 (60%)     max: 1635 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18.9     avg: 23     median: 23 (4%)     max: 27 Watt
min: 59     avg: 78.4     median: 61.3 (11%)     max: 114.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
min: 62     avg: 79.3     median: 63 (12%)     max: 113 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.34     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 8.21 Watt
min: 4.3     avg: 6.2     median: 6.3 (4%)     max: 7.86 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.65     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
17.7 Points per Watt (13%)
min: 37.4     avg: 37.8     median: 37.8 (28%)     max: 38.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6005 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS → 418% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 26. 21:54:34

#0 checking url part for id 13109 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15052 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719431674 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:15:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13109 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 13109 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15052 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 15052 +0.007s ... 0.026s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.066s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)