Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop

NVIDIA RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop

The Nvidia RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop is a low mid-range mobile GPU that belongs to Nvidia's professional series. It's based on the Blackwell architecture and features 1,792 CUDA processing cores and 6 GB of GDDR7 memory. The memory bandwidth of this model can reach 288 GB/s. The card features 5th Gen Tensor cores and 4th Gen RT-cores in addition to 1,792 CUDA cores - that helps it to reach 9.2 TFLOPs FP32 and 294 AI TOPS performance figures.  Thanks to the Nvidia MAX-Q technology stack, this GPU offers better efficiency; its TGP can be customised in the range of 35-75 watts (including dynamic boost). 

RTX PRO Blackwell Generation Laptop GPU Series

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Generation Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Generation Laptop compare 7680 @ 0.98 - 1.5 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Generation Laptop compare 5888 @ 0.85 - 1.45 GHz192 Bit @ 28000 MHz
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 28000 MHz
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Generation Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 1.63 GHz128 Bit
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop 1792 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz96 Bit
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines1792 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs24
Raytracing Cores14
Tensor / AI Cores56
Core Speed2235 - 2520 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance9.2 TFLOPS FP32
AI GPU294 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 1.8 MB, L2: 24 MB
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory5.9 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth288 GB/s
APIDirectX 12.2, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Transistor Count16.9 Billion
technology5 nm
PCIe5
DisplaysDisplayPort 2.1b
Date of Announcement19.03.2025
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.2 pt (19%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
15485 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
16676 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
211479 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6589 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6121 Points (12%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
50932 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
85015 Points (21%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
20916 Points (25%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
21497 Points (16%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
71988 Points (21%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
66766 Points (36%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
53112 Points (69%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
74 Seconds (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
37 Seconds (14%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
159.1 fps (29%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
270.1 fps (30%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
73.8 fps (20%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
275.2 fps (29%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
35.4 fps (6%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
122.3 fps (42%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
61.2 fps (30%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
74.3 fps (20%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6842 points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
76.5 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
276 fps (16%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
57 fps (21%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
137 fps (25%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
377 fps (28%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
348 fps (33%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
453 fps (10%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
603 fps (25%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
1220 fps (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (3%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
61197 points (16%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
61667 points (15%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
3295 Samples/s (12%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
6574 Samples/s (12%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
14445 points (12%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.7 Watt (9%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
74.6 Watt (21%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
72.3 Watt (9%)
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.6 fps per Watt (2%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7

2025
low 1920x1080
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 117: Pax Romana

Anno 117: Pax Romana

2025
low 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
84.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
73.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
38.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
127.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
78.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
21.2
low 1920x1080
40.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
37.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
203  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1920x1080
57  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
43.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
18.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
43.2
low 1920x1080
74.9 79.4 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.6 62.3 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.1 54.2 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
51.3 52 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.4 35.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
med. 1920x1080
99  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
106
low 1280x720
92  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
74.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
150.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
85.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
65.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
46.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
158.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
144.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
131.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
high 1920x1080
146.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Black Ops 772634713
Anno 117: Pax Romana5441.230.815.910.9
ARC Raiders84.573.85744.238.1
Borderlands 43726.620.18.68
F1 25127.2104.878.86.66
Doom: The Dark Ages40.633.530.128.7
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered37.629.710.9
Assassin's Creed Shadows37342918
Civilization 7203120.389.561.6
Monster Hunter Wilds35.7430.7625.94
Kingdom Come Deliverance 25743.636.22618.5
Cyberpunk 207776.661.252.245.627.1
Baldur's Gate 37761545236
Far Cry 59989855929
X-Plane 11.119274.661.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark150.385.565.646.7
Dota 2 Reborn158.3144.6138.4131.1
GTA V146.180.158.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

6
5
4
1
6
8
2
4
7
5
2
8
3
2
1
3
5
1
1


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 07. 18:24:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 07 Dec 2025 05:38:14 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13063 +0.028s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 13063 +0.01s ... 0.068s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.763s ... 0.831s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.832s

#12 Got 79 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.844s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.844s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.854s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.14s ... 0.995s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 1.001s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Nvidia RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Generation Laptop - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-05- 1)