Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, which was presented at CES 2025 and is expected to be commercially available in April 2025.

Architecture

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile utilizes the GB203 chip and employs 10,496 shaders/CUDA cores, which is the maximum of 10,752 that the chip supports. This makes the RTX 5090 Laptop more similar to the RTX 5080 desktop variant (same chip) than the Desktop RTX 5090 with 20,760 cores and higher clock rates.

As a novelty, Blackwell offers support for Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) with DLSS4, thanks to the 5th generation of Tensor cores.

Performance

As our tests show, performance gains over a 175W RTX 4090 Laptop GPU are barely noticeable in 3DMark tests. Still, when it comes to overall gaming performance, the card is 2-19% faster than the previous mobile flagship. The fastest laptop variant we tested is only 5% behind the RTX 5080 desktop. 

Power consumption

The GB203 chip is manufactured at TSMC in the 4N (4nm) process. The maximum TGP of the card can reach 175 watts (150 watts + 25 watts Dynamic Boost). 

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X11
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines10496 - unified
TMUs328
ROPs112
Raytracing Cores82
Tensor / AI Cores328
Core Speed990 - 1515 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance31.8 TFLOPS FP16, 31.8 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL1: 10.3 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory24 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (95 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
19 pt (57%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 17820     avg: 21898     median: 22198 (59%)     max: 24013 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 19216     avg: 23832     median: 24225 (49%)     max: 25763 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
862499 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
595187 Points (70%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 69384     avg: 74433     median: 73846 (70%)     max: 80657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 133460     avg: 144088     median: 139912 (34%)     max: 163068 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 35623     avg: 40799     median: 39022.5 (59%)     max: 49845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 42516     avg: 52345     median: 50816 (47%)     max: 62849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 532587     avg: 564006     median: 564006 (62%)     max: 595425 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
153090 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 34972     avg: 45356     median: 46751 (54%)     max: 49864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
92650 Points (87%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
203190 Points (78%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 40400     avg: 49259     median: 49578 (60%)     max: 54178 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 54052     avg: 67982     median: 70631 (54%)     max: 76300 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
111238 Points (32%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
131334 Points (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
64778 Points (85%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
268.3 fps (81%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 15     avg: 18.4     median: 16 (2%)     max: 37 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 9     avg: 12.1     median: 11.5 (4%)     max: 18 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 22892     avg: 23907     median: 23907 (17%)     max: 24922 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 232.51     avg: 235.6     median: 235.6 (78%)     max: 238.7 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 121.3     avg: 276.2     median: 288 (17%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 99.5     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 99.6 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 242.8     avg: 254.8     median: 254.8 (96%)     max: 266.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 466     avg: 512     median: 511.5 (92%)     max: 557 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1067     avg: 1094     median: 1094.5 (81%)     max: 1121.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 975     avg: 1017     median: 1016.6 (96%)     max: 1058.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
1112 fps (24%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1154 fps (48%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
4193 fps (33%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 537     median: 315 (8%)     max: 2756 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 181670     avg: 217038     median: 225733 (59%)     max: 234266 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7393     avg: 149077     median: 185851 (46%)     max: 231659 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 9883     avg: 15906     median: 15906 (57%)     max: 21929 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 10315     avg: 15697     median: 15697 (28%)     max: 21079 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 48753     avg: 53491     median: 53490.5 (44%)     max: 58228 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 224.4     median: 227 (31%)     max: 250 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 200     avg: 240.5     median: 240.5 (34%)     max: 281 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 0.778     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (72%)     max: 0.96 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 164.5     avg: 277.3     median: 292 (85%)     max: 343 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 160.4     avg: 273.4     median: 288.5 (37%)     max: 333 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4623     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.686 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
240 279 317 322 ~ 290 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
226 256 268 279 308 ~ 267 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 241 252 280 291 ~ 256 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57 58.6 58.8 59.8 62.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34 35.8 36.1 36.8 37.5 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16 16.7 17.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32.2 34.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 64 67.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
111.6
114
116.9
117.9
low 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
117.3 124.3 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.4 113.9 ~ 111 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 111.3 ~ 108 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77 82.1 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
63  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
102.3 107.3 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
118.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
104.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
112 115 126 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
104 109 115 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90 95 97 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44 62 63 64 65 69 70 70 74 75 75 76 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
37 50 51 54 55 55 56 57 59 59 59 63 64 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35 36 39 40 40 41 41 42 46 46 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
47 53 53 53 55 59 61 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45 62 64 65 65 69 76 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
106
97
105
108
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
66
78
74
81
84
med. 1920x1080
206 231 ~ 219 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
203 225 ~ 214 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
171.3 184.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ultra 1920x1080
66.4 68.1 80.8 87.6 88.2 88.3 88.9 89 94.6 95.3 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54 65.6 70.3 72 73.3 73.8 74.7 75 76.4 80.5 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 44.1 46 46.3 46.8 46.9 47.5 47.7 48.5 50.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.6 61.2 64 64.5 69.2 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
63.9 68.6 79 85 86.4 92.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
184.3 195.8 ~ 190 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151.7 165.7 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108 118.5 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.6 86 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.7 114.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
187.5 192.6 203 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
138.2 142.6 151.9 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.7 119.6 121.9 127.9 128.6 130.6 132 133.4 133.9 135.2 140.3 142.3 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.1 97.3 99.1 101.3 102 102.2 102.6 105 105.9 106 107.1 112.6 112.9 115.9 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.2 62.3 63.5 65 65.6 66.4 66.6 66.6 68.6 70.8 73 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
76.2 113.9 118 120.6 122.4 133.7 ~ 114 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
72.9
180
80.2
82
84.2
91.5
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
109
51.9
51
51.8
56.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
100 106.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.1 92.6 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
76.3 81.8 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.8 65.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
124.9 134.6 ~ 130 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
201 205 215 229 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
186 194 200 209 ~ 197 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 157 165 169 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
128 147 147 151 161 162 162 ~ 151 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
92 116 117 123 127 131 136 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60 71 79 82 90 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
131  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
109.9 110.6 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
96.9 102.4 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.5 93.9 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.6 69.5 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.7 86.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
102.8 104.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102.1 103.1 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 101.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
97.2 98.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
97.5 100.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.3 91.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7 82.9 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
70 71.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
54 61 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
70.8 70.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
109  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
57 63 65 74 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
44 47 48 50 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
27 28 30 33 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
46 52 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
64 67 70 73 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
45
44
47
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
76
82
82
85
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
236 240 301 343 361 421 ~ 317 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
236 260 299 335 342 369 399 ~ 320 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
236 240 252 281 305 324 341 357 357 ~ 299 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
107.5 129 133 139 144.2 144.9 148 152 152.2 154.2 154.9 155.4 157.8 158.3 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.5 90 94.9 95 97.8 100 101 101.2 103.3 103.6 104 104.3 105 105.5 106.4 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48.8 49 50 50.5 51.3 52 52 52.2 52.3 54.2 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
80.5 80.8 82 87.9 89.2 90.2 90.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
77.7  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.5 126 130.7 139.1 141 141.8 151 156.3 159.3 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
156.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
257
med. 1920x1080
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
119.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
115.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
104.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
84.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
105.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
160.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
121.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
95  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
116.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
93.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
157.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
153.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
140.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
123.4 130.5 135.7 145.4 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119.6 129.6 137.7 138.6 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
83 95 95.2 116.1 116.4 120.6 124.7 125.2 127.2 127.7 129.7 133.2 ~ 116 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57.6 76.7 81.1 82.4 82.9 83.4 84.5 88.1 88.3 88.4 88.5 88.5 88.8 91.4 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4 43 43.1 45.9 46 46.2 46.8 47.1 47.7 49.3 49.6 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
69.7 75.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
70.9
72
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
21.8
22.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
19.7
20
20.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
38.7
38.2
39.4
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
66.7
65.8
71.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
116.3
120.6
125.7
med. 1920x1080
390  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
327  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
275  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
224  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.8 154.7 164.2 173.7 178.7 186 191.2 194.9 208 226 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.4 146.4 154.5 171.6 177.3 181.6 185 187.9 188.1 191 202 208 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117.8 124.5 147 161.5 166.4 166.8 168.9 170.2 171.9 174.5 177.1 179.1 180 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 112.3 137.5 151.9 152.5 153.6 154.8 154.9 157 157.5 158.5 163.4 164 166.5 167.3 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
83.2 98.6 104.8 106.8 107.7 108.3 109.7 109.7 110.6 110.8 111.1 111.2 111.3 111.4 115.6 118.9 120.5 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.6 50.7 52.1 52.3 52.7 52.8 52.9 53.1 53.1 53.5 54.7 55 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.2 73.8 76.9 79.5 80.2 80.6 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
46.2 46.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
94.1 104.6 118.4 119 125.3 125.5 126.2 128.1 132.4 136.6 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
173.2
177.8
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
80.6
81.7
84.9
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
153.8
156.9
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
23.4
25.7
25
25
25.8
26.1
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
107.9
143.5
144.2
110
135
151.4
144.4
172.1
137.1
148.8
154
146
152.4
152.6
154.3
157
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
13.9
13.6
13
13
13.8
13.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
26.1
28.9
28.1
28.9
28.2
29.7
29.5
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
46.2
50.4
50.4
52
50
47.4
50.8
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.7
90.1
90
96.3
93.5
86.3
93.7
low 1920x1080
180 250 250 260.8 274 333.4 ~ 258 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
175 199 217 218.2 224 229.6 244 260.7 ~ 221 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
163.5 196.7 197 198.5 202 203.7 213.5 227.4 ~ 200 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
143.1 162 193.3 193.7 194 196.2 200 201 202 213 218.8 220.4 225.3 236.5 ~ 200 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103.1 138.8 139.6 141.7 145.6 146 149.5 150.5 151 151 156.4 156.9 158.4 161.5 174.8 ~ 148 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.2 79.1 81.7 82.8 84.1 84.3 84.6 85.3 89.8 94 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
124.2 124.9 125.4 129 129 135.5 149.3 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
192 237.3 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
269
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
404 480 511 553 563 601 617 643 652 ~ 558 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
341 381 398 426 431 475 478 482 509 526 ~ 445 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
322 334 397 418 425 450 457 473 485 499 ~ 426 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
308 319 375 382 401 408 418 434 437 453 453.1 456 464 ~ 408 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
240 287 303 308 315 319 330 336 339 342.9 343 345 350 ~ 320 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
164.2 168 174.6 177.5 179.3 179.6 182.2 185.5 187.2 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108.9 109.4 122.9 140.4 149.2 153.2 153.7 158 160 161.3 161.6 163.4 172.3 181.1 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103.6 111.8 133 136.1 139.2 141.5 143.3 143.6 143.9 148.3 152.6 155.6 158.1 159.9 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
85.2 91.4 110 112.6 113.2 114.2 115.9 119.5 120.9 121.7 122.1 122.9 129.8 133.6 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
71.3 89.9 94.8 95.6 100 100.2 102.4 104.3 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
174.7 218 232 233 233 234 234 234 235 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
167.8 184.5 226 226 230 230 231 232 233 233 234 236 ~ 222 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.4 154.4 192.6 194.6 199.3 201 201 203 203 205 208 212 212 215 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
123.4 139.5 157 160.5 160.7 161.8 162.4 166.4 170.7 172.2 173.5 176.5 177.2 179.5 181 183.6 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
96.8 99 101.3 102.9 103.9 104.7 106.4 109.2 109.4 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
170.5 173.9 215 216 217 223 223 225 229 234 234 240 251 313 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152.7 154.4 184.1 186.6 189.4 193.8 195.2 196.6 204 207 207 210 214 288 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
143.3 151.3 177.5 178.9 179.2 187.5 188.3 190.2 193 197.3 198.3 200 208 275 ~ 191 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
137.1 141.9 161 166.4 167.2 170.3 171.5 175.5 176.4 184.7 185.6 186.1 186.6 248 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
133 151.6 165.3 168.6 174 176.8 178.5 179.9 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
192 218.5 224 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
151 185 ~ 168 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
114 129 ~ 122 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
182 185.2 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
178 184.5 186.7 187.5 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
180.4 180.5 182.5 185.3 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121.6 136.6 140.9 142.4 161.9 162.4 162.8 164.1 166.1 166.2 186.9 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
96.9 121.4 129.7 133.4 156.8 158 160.1 163.1 164.3 165.6 183.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
150.7 173.2 176.1 179.5 179.9 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
84.4
110.3
110.6
114.7
116.7
104.2
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
183
184.8
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
179.4
186.5
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25290267256593617
Doom: The Dark Ages133.51211111088043.3
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered118.4104.257.541.7
Assassin's Creed Shadows11810994675541
Civilization 7219214178
Monster Hunter Wilds857246
Kingdom Come Deliverance 219015911384
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle19414412810365
Stalker 2103907963
Call of Duty Black Ops 621319715715112076
Until Dawn1101009168
Space Marine 210310310198
Star Wars Outlaws85787158
Black Myth: Wukong109654730
F1 243173202991459951
Senua's Saga Hellblade 296.876.656.2
Ghost of Tsushima119.6115.1104.284.9
Horizon Forbidden West160.3121.6120.395
Dragon's Dogma 299.393.4
Helldivers 2157.7157.3153.8140.1
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357357
Alan Wake 21341311168445
Counter-Strike 2390327275224
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty18017616215010952
Baldur's Gate 325822120020014883
Strange Brigade558445426408320178
X-Plane 11.1115014111595
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark225222196165104
Dota 2 Reborn226199191176166
The Witcher 3212168122
GTA V184184182156148172
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
13


8
18


13
16

2
10
13

6
13
10
1
7
5
4

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 14. 14:30:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:36:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12928 +0.024s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 12928 +0.043s ... 0.094s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.865s ... 0.959s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.959s

#12 Got 1262 rows for game benchmarks. +0.781s ... 1.74s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.74s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.026s ... 1.766s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.284s ... 2.05s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 2.056s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop graphics card

Alienware 18 Area-51 laptop review: Performance above all else

Alienware 18 Area-51 laptop review: Performance above all else

The redesigned Alienware 18 is proof that you don't need to be the thinnest or lightest to be sexy. Its thicker profile allows for both extra performance and fe...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 4.2 kg
MSI Titan 18 HX AI in review

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Review: No-holds-barred Core Ultra 9 285HX and 175 W RTX 5090 Laptop performance

The Titan 18 HX AI leaves no stone unturned in its quest for mobile gaming dominance with its elite-tier Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Lapto...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.6 kg
Competing against ROG, Legion and co with an RTX 5090 and 240 Hz OLED - Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 gaming laptop review

Competing against ROG, Legion and co with an RTX 5090 and 240 Hz OLED - Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 gaming laptop review

We finally managed to get our test-savvy hands on the Aorus Master 16 with an RTX 5090, OLED display, Thunderbolt 5, PCIe 5.0 and WiFi 7. Is this the new perfor...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 laptop review: RTX 5090 gamer with optional water cooling

Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 laptop review: RTX 5090 gamer with optional water cooling

The Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate is currently one of the fastest gaming notebooks on the market, which can be operated with external water cooling if desired. We...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.8 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and RTX 5090 Laptop for maximum gaming performance - XMG Neo 16 A25 review

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and RTX 5090 Laptop for maximum gaming performance - XMG Neo 16 A25 review

XMG is also offering its high-end gaming laptop with AMD processors this year. We are testing the Neo 16 A25, equipped with the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D processor, GeFo...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.9 kg

Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
  Review » AMD is the gaming leader with its Fire Range HX3D - Ryzen 9 9955HX3D vs. Intel Core Ultra 275HX review

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
  Review » The fastest gaming laptop is now even better thanks to 300 Hz mini LED - XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 laptop review

Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 2025: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » The RTX 5090 Laptop and mini LED inside a gaming laptop - Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 review

HP Omen Max 16 ah000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  Review » HP Omen Max 16 laptop review: Super fast but a little bit too hot

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  Review » Aorus Master 18 gaming laptop review: The RTX 5090 takes its toll

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » The slimmest gaming notebooks with the RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Razer Blade 16

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » The slimmest gaming notebooks with the RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 vs. Razer Blade 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » A slim gaming laptop now with an RTX 5090 and 64 GB of RAM - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 review

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Analysis: The battle for the fastest gaming CPU

SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX vs. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Analysis: The battle for the fastest gaming CPU

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  Review » The 18-inch gamer with great mini LED and an RTX 5090 Laptop - Asus Strix SCAR 18 G835LX review

SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 Preview - The fastest gaming notebook now with AMD, RTX 5000 and 300 Hz Mini-LED

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 review - Gaming laptop now with GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop and an even slimmer case

  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Analysis - Faster, but there is more to come

SCHENKER Neo 16 A25 5090 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Analysis - Faster, but there is more to come

MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG: Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, 18.00", 3.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H

Aorus Master 18 AM8H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Aorus Master 18 AM8H

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090

Alienware 18 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 4.2 kg
   » Alienware 18 Area-51 is missing one key feature against the MSI Titan 18 HX

   » Alienware 18 Area-51 outperforms nearly all other gaming laptops and we have the benchmarks to prove it

Aorus MASTER 16 AM6H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 5090 laptops in comparison: Where does the Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 rank?

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » Intel is beaten - AMD's Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 3D V-Cache is the best choice for gaming

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E25 RTX 5090 Laptop: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » XMG Neo 16 E25: Still one of the best gaming laptops but Advanced Optimus/G-Sync is lacking

Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
   » Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) with RTX 5090, mini-LED screen and Thunderbolt 5 now available for preorder

Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » The 2025 Razer Blade 16 with the RTX 5090 Laptop looks like a downgrade

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)