Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop is a high-end notebook graphics card that was presented at CES 2025 and will go on sale in April 2025. It uses the GB203 Blackwell chip and offers 8,192 of the chip's 10,752 cores. The graphics memory used is 16 GB GDDR7, which is connected via a 256-bit memory bus (896 GB/s maximum bandwidth).

A new feature of the Blackwell architecture is support for multi-frame generation (MFG) in DLSS4.

The GB203 is manufactured at TSMC using the 4N FinFET process (4nm or 5nm). Currently, much of the data is still based on the specifications at Techpowerup.

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop compare 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X9
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines8192 - unified
TMUs256
ROPs96
Raytracing Cores64
Tensor / AI Cores256
Core Speed975 - 2287 (Boost) MHz
CacheL1: 8 MB, L2: 64 MB
Memory Speed28000 effective = 1750 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory16 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth896 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025
PredecessorNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
18 pt (54%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 15055     avg: 19289     median: 19736 (53%)     max: 21992 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 16644     avg: 20756     median: 21242 (43%)     max: 23003 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 61468     avg: 66671     median: 65589 (62%)     max: 72956 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 125367     avg: 132070     median: 129942 (32%)     max: 140900 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 30780     avg: 37027     median: 36403.5 (55%)     max: 45940 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 40859     avg: 47871     median: 48129 (44%)     max: 56116 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
378821 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 31990     avg: 38962     median: 40742 (47%)     max: 44155 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 39151     avg: 47100     median: 47539 (58%)     max: 51993 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 54868     avg: 64819     median: 65874 (50%)     max: 71866 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
134668 Points (39%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
151016 Points (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
69181 Points (90%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
250.9 fps (76%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 18     avg: 23.1     median: 20 (3%)     max: 49 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 11.6     avg: 14.7     median: 13 (5%)     max: 26 Seconds
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
24952 points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
227.9 fps (75%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 248     avg: 294     median: 291.5 (17%)     max: 346 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 233.5     avg: 234     median: 234 (88%)     max: 234.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 502.8     avg: 505     median: 504.8 (91%)     max: 506.8 fps
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1074     avg: 1086     median: 1085.8 (80%)     max: 1097.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 997     avg: 1005     median: 1005.3 (95%)     max: 1013.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1108     avg: 1129     median: 1129.2 (24%)     max: 1150.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1062     avg: 1087     median: 1087.4 (45%)     max: 1112.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 4018     avg: 4077     median: 4077.5 (32%)     max: 4136.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 1121     median: 1131.5 (28%)     max: 2141 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 159452     avg: 192241     median: 194861 (51%)     max: 208371 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7864     avg: 85120     median: 45801 (11%)     max: 181551 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
9029 Samples/s (32%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
19188 Samples/s (34%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
49349 points (41%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 145.3     avg: 213.1     median: 232 (31%)     max: 253 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
281 Watt (39%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (60%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 157.4     avg: 258.3     median: 256 (75%)     max: 318 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.5     avg: 258.5     median: 270 (34%)     max: 319 Watt
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4412     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.664 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
177.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
176.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
169.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
24.8  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
89.4
low 1920x1080
117.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
102.5 113 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95.6 104 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88 94.8 101 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64 65 72 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
36.6  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
55  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
85 89.1 97 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
106.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
94.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
50.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
53.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
91 110 111 115 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81 95 104 104 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68 88 90 91 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 58 58 63 64 65 69 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41 46 50 50 55 55 55 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32 34 38 39 40 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
44 48 52 54 55 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54 60 65 66 117 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
87
82
94
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
67
61
73
med. 1920x1080
173.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
165.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
158  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
102.5 110.1 127.6 ~ 113 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
97.2 104.4 111 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.7 82.5 83.1 90 90 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.9 67.7 69.8 70.6 73.2 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.6 42.7 42.9 45.2 47.6 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
50.9 57.9 59.3 60 61.8 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
64.9 80.1 80.8 87.7 ~ 78 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
173.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
142.4 186.4 187.9 189.3 ~ 177 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
109 141.8 145.8 145.9 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
95.7 110.7 124.2 127.2 127.2 129.2 ~ 119 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.4 85.1 87.8 99.3 99.5 100.1 102.4 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
53.8 55.2 57.2 61.8 62.5 63.2 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
86.8 101.2 117.1 118.1 120.1 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
150
73.4
77.1
64.2
67.1
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 3840x2160
28.4
22.5
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
122.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
155 210 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
143 190 ~ 167 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106 150 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
99 138 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
73 109 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
72  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
71  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98 117 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
74.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
89.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
88.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
86.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
86.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
79.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
72.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
67.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
51.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
64.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
171  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
124 128 ~ 126 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96 99 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50 56 57 58 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41 43 43 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23 24 26 26 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
39 42 45 45 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
54 62 64 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
0
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 3840x2160
43
37
40
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
74
64
72
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
396  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
349 399 ~ 374 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
225 277 318 354 ~ 294 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
103.6 110.3 127.5 132.5 134.8 137.7 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.8 77 79.3 84.5 84.7 91.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.8 39.4 41.9 46.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
65.9 68.2 71.8 76.7 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
109.1 126.9 129.1 134.2 139.1 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
76  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
55.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
110.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
105.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
96.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
148.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
117.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
115.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
110.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
84.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
82.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
135.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
134.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
131.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
127.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
92.2 130.6 134.7 135.6 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.7 125.7 125.9 131.9 ~ 118 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83.8 99.1 112.6 113.5 115.7 116.4 124.2 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.3 67.2 74.3 76.5 78.3 80.2 83.8 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
35.4 39.7 40.7 42.3 43.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.8 59.9 63.1 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
64.5
53.7
56.7
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 3840x2160
20
16.9
18.5
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
18
18.5
16
17.3
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
34.6
34.9
29.5
32.6
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
61.7
62.8
53
58.3
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
109.6
112.8
91.1
105.8
med. 1920x1080
345  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
290  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
255  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
205  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
125.1 171.8 176.3 187.9 198.4 211 225 ~ 185 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
122.3 157.8 160.2 170.3 180.5 192 192.9 197.1 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.8 118.4 143.9 148.1 150.4 160.9 167.2 167.9 172.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
109.8 109.9 135.1 136.6 139.6 139.8 144.3 149.9 151.9 156.2 ~ 137 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.6 85.9 90 94.6 95.1 96.4 99.5 99.7 99.8 102.4 104 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39.1 40.9 42 42.7 46.3 46.5 47.1 47.5 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
59.3 59.6 62.2 69.2 71.5 72.3 73.4 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
34.4 43 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
89 94 103.8 103.9 110.6 111 115.6 117.9 119 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
240
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
73.4
60.7
68.2
71.1
65.3
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
169.7
173.1
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
22.4
21.4
18.6
21.8
22.1
18.4
19.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
141.2
140.9
128.4
103.2
133.4
100.7
144.6
129.1
141.1
123.2
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
12
12
10.3
11.4
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
24.8
25.3
21.6
24.7
24.5
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
45.1
41.7
39.6
44.8
44.6
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
83.4
84.4
69.8
81.7
81.9
low 1920x1080
172.8 203 232 244 244.8 260 276.1 ~ 233 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
159.8 160 195.5 202 206 209.1 220.6 250.5 ~ 200 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141 144.9 171.9 181.6 182.4 185.4 194.5 220.1 ~ 178 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
144 163.3 166.3 169.3 178 179.6 180.3 191.9 202.6 211.5 ~ 179 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
106.9 118.3 120.7 123 130.5 132.8 133.1 136.7 154.4 155.8 ~ 131 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55.7 69.8 70.6 74.3 79.8 81.1 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
30.6 83.2 105.6 114.4 114.6 129.6 132.4 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
167.3 181 207.5 ~ 185 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
278
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
408 549 553 600 613 ~ 545 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
352 406 429 434 456 495 ~ 429 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
323 386 393 403 406 451 481 ~ 406 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
299 314 356 367 371 371 397 412 434 ~ 369 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
235 261 265 278 281 283 296 303 304 ~ 278 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
144 148.9 150 156.1 159 169.7 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
107 118.9 135.7 143 145.8 156.6 158 158.5 163.7 182.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.4 104.3 127.5 131.1 132.2 135.5 136.3 138.2 139.5 153.7 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
76.9 84.2 105.1 108.8 108.9 110.6 111.9 113.9 123.7 124.5 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
69.6 86.6 90.8 98.7 100.7 101.8 124.1 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
194.4 231 233 233 233 234 ~ 226 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
175.6 207 218 220 229 232 232 ~ 216 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146 152.3 176.3 183.7 189.6 189.6 189.9 191.7 194.8 210 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
111.2 118.8 131.3 144.5 149.4 151.2 152.1 153 158.8 173.1 ~ 144 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.6 76.7 87 88.9 96.5 101.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
164.2 171.5 201 211 220 224 228 240 265 327 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
141.9 155.7 177.5 186.4 188.9 193.1 201 216 229 304 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
139.7 145.8 173.2 175.1 180.4 185.9 191.6 203 212 271 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
128.5 134.2 158.3 160.4 162.3 171.7 175.5 188.9 194.7 239 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
119 152.9 155.9 167.9 180.2 182.1 199.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
203  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.9 186.5 190.2 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
184.1 184.6 185.4 189.5 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
170.6 181.3 181.5 186.5 189 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124.8 139.5 146.1 158.7 164.1 168.2 185 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
120.6 137.4 143.9 151.7 156.2 163.3 177.8 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
173.3 182.8 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
102.2
92.5
96.7
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
189.7
183.4
184.3
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.2
187
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 25177.7176.1169.944.327.312.8
Doom: The Dark Ages117.1108100956736.6
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered106.394.150.636.6
Assassin's Creed Shadows1079684615037
Civilization 7173.4165.5158
Monster Hunter Wilds113104826843
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2173.8145.6101.674.5
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle1771361199259
Stalker 290.778.172.658.5
Call of Duty Black Ops 61831671281199172
Until Dawn92.99181.659
Space Marine 29089.788.786.2
Star Wars Outlaws79.872.767.851.4
Black Myth: Wukong17112698554325
F1 243963742941248142
Senua's Saga Hellblade 299.37655.1
Ghost of Tsushima110.7105.797.576.7
Horizon Forbidden West148.2117.7115.590.7
Dragon's Dogma 284.882.3
Helldivers 2135.9134.5131.9127.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown356356356356
Alan Wake 21231181097440
Counter-Strike 2345290255205
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty1851721491379544
Baldur's Gate 323320017817913172
Strange Brigade545429406369278155
X-Plane 11.1114713010796
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark22621618214487
Dota 2 Reborn225199188171165
The Witcher 3203
GTA V188186182155150178
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
13


11
17


14
15

3
12
10
1
7
12
8
2
7
4
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 16. 16:48:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:38:50 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12927 +0.029s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 12927 +0.044s ... 0.102s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.102s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.85s ... 0.952s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.952s

#12 Got 693 rows for game benchmarks. +0.389s ... 1.341s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.341s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.023s ... 1.364s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.327s ... 1.691s

#16 return log +0.006s ... 1.698s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop graphics card

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI review: Finally, a quieter gaming laptop, but at what cost?

Acer Predator Helios 18 AI review: Finally, a quieter gaming laptop, but at what cost?

With its Core Ultra 9 275HX and RTX 5080 laptop, the 18-inch gaming desktop replacement actually falls into the high-end gaming category. So what makes the Heli...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.5 kg
Alienware 16 Area-51 laptop review: Dell's best flagship gaming laptop yet

Alienware 16 Area-51 laptop review: Dell's best flagship gaming laptop yet

Dell is refreshing its Alienware lineup this year from the ground up with new Arrow Lake CPUs, new Blackwell GPUs, and a new AW30 design language. The Area-51 l...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 3.3 kg
AMD brings the fire with the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: MSI Raider A18 HX A9W laptop review

AMD brings the fire with the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: MSI Raider A18 HX A9W laptop review

Performance or mobility? In the case of the MSI Raider A18 HX, it is clearly performance! With the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080, this gi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.6 kg
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 laptop review: Almost as fast but so much cheaper

Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 laptop review: Almost as fast but so much cheaper

We all prefer to have the GeForce RTX 5090 configuration, of course, but when the RTX 5080 option is $1000 less expensive, the slower SKU suddenly becomes so mu...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.1 kg
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 laptop review: How does the RTX 5080 perform in the gaming giant?

Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 laptop review: How does the RTX 5080 perform in the gaming giant?

With a price tag exceeding $4,000, the Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 is mainly targeted at passionate gamers with the proper budget. In return, it provides the lat...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | 18.00" | 3.6 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » 14 inches with the GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 review

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » The RTX 5080 Laptop is optimal for Gaming in WQHD - Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 review

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 laptop review: 400 W power supply with almost no compromises

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5080 Engineering Sample: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
  Review » XMG Neo 16 2025 Preview - The fastest gaming notebook now with AMD, RTX 5000 and 300 Hz Mini-LED

  Review » Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop Analysis - Faster, but there is more to come

Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H : Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IAX10H

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » RTX 5070 Ti, Core Ultra 9 and 240Hz OLED: Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 gets biggest discount thus far

Alienware 16 Area-51: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.3 kg
   » Size still matters: Alienware 16 Area-51 RTX 5080 can outperform the Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090

   » Alienware 16 Area-51 locks its fastest 175 W TGP graphics mode behind the loudest fan setting

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 2025 Lenovo Legion Pro 7i with RTX 5090 and Core Ultra 9 275HX gets another price cut

MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 18.00", 3.6 kg
   » 18-inch laptops: This category should be more than just for gaming laptops like the MSI Raider A18

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000ng: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
   » RTX 5080 and Core Ultra 9-powered HP Omen Max 16 gets massive 36% discount

Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » RTX 5090-powered Lenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 10 with 240Hz OLED display hits lowest price yet

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14: The fastest 14-inch gamer but no 5090 is a missed opportunity

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Strix G16 2025 review verdict: Good RTX 5080 gaming laptop, but faster Ryzen 9 9955HX is only available with RTX 5070 Ti

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)