Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, unveiled at CES 2025. It is based on the GB205 chip, featuring 5,888 shader/CUDA cores clocked at 847-1995 MHz (depending on the model) and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit interface. The model also has 46 RT-cores, as well as 80 ROPs.

Performance

As our tests show, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is 23% faster than the standard RTX 5070 laptop on average in benchmarks. Gaming performance delta is lower; here, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is only 15% faster on average than the RTX 5070 laptop. The desktop counterpart, the RTX 5070 Ti, is 34% faster.

Power consumption

The chip is manufactured in the current TSMC 4N process. The maximum allowed TGP for this model is 140 watts.

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 2.24 - 2.52 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X7
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines5888 - unified
TMUs184
ROPs64
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores184
CacheL1: 5.8 MB, L2: 48 MB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth677 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 13812     avg: 16269     median: 16839.5 (45%)     max: 17747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14945     avg: 16701     median: 17130 (35%)     max: 17981 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 61167     avg: 70833     median: 72601 (69%)     max: 76961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 134306     avg: 152739     median: 154800 (38%)     max: 167048 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 32615     avg: 36594     median: 36215 (55%)     max: 42125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 39170     avg: 44112     median: 44603.5 (41%)     max: 47933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 28297     avg: 31077     median: 31220.5 (36%)     max: 33569 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 37247     avg: 43952     median: 45294 (55%)     max: 47299 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 50966     avg: 56866     median: 56824 (43%)     max: 61651 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
123001 Points (36%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
122701 Points (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 60964     avg: 63089     median: 63089 (82%)     max: 65214 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 24     avg: 24.7     median: 24.5 (4%)     max: 26 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 14.1     avg: 15.4     median: 15.5 (6%)     max: 16 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 292     avg: 315.4     median: 327 (19%)     max: 333 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
184.7 fps (69%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
403.5 fps (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
960 fps (71%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
859 fps (81%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
983 fps (21%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1084 fps (45%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
3321 fps (26%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 597     median: 209.8 (5%)     max: 1863 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 67235     avg: 149173     median: 162098 (42%)     max: 178141 points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 7882     avg: 63613     median: 40229 (10%)     max: 166112 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
7623 Samples/s (27%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
15570 Samples/s (27%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
42476 points (35%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 163.3     avg: 186.3     median: 185.3 (25%)     max: 203 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
221 Watt (31%)
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (58%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 222     avg: 248     median: 245 (71%)     max: 285 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 217     avg: 244.3     median: 242 (31%)     max: 278 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4317     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.509 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
181.7 188.4 242 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
181.2 184.5 217 ~ 194 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
168.3 170.8 171.9 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3 35 35.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 20 21.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32 36.9 39.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
69.7
64.7
61
low 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 94.8 94.9 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.3 84.3 86.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65 82.7 85.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7 57.9 59.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 79.1 82.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
86.9 94 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.2 81.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40 42.9 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 30.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
41.9 44.7 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
81 85 93 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 77 84 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63 66 70 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 52 53 55 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40 41 42 44 45 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49 51 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
78
70
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
56
med. 1920x1080
192.1 212 ~ 202 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
187.5 202 ~ 195 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
129.1 141.9 ~ 136 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
ultra 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
70.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
145.2 153.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
118.8 126.7 ~ 123 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
84.1 88.2 ~ 86 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59 62.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.2 86.1 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126.7 144.4 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.5 102.4 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.2 89.9 101 107.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.5 68.4 77.6 82.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.7 43.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
91.1 99.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
20.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
84.6 89.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6 76.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62 65.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.9 49.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.8 104.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
138 152 159 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
135 142 150 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100 121 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94 94 97 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65 68 68 89 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
84.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
70.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
66.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
55.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
40.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
56.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 24

F1 24

2024
med. 1920x1080
226  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 223 250 ~ 230 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.2 93 107.6 108 114.8 ~ 102 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.2 60.4 69.4 71.2 72.1 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
38.6 61.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
78.1 88.5 94.1 115.8 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
113.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
77.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
83.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
131.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
93.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
143.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
93.2 93.2 108.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2 88.3 103.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.5 81.7 95.8 96 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.5 54.6 63.9 64.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
13.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
22.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
39.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
72.4
med. 1920x1080
316  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
174.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
131.6 150.4 175.1 188.6 203 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
127.4 134.4 138.5 166.9 169.2 178.7 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
115.9 117 133.9 135.4 143.2 144.6 154.1 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
104.9 105.4 119.6 126.7 129 129.9 132.4 135.5 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.4 71.7 75 80.8 81.6 82.6 84.3 87.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9 37.1 37.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
57.4  fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.5 83.6 91.2 91.6 94.2 102.1 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
206
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
60.7
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
157.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
17.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
104.9
122.6
104.9
99.1
110.5
120.5
116.2
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
3.7
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
19.4
19.9
18.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
34
35.8
31
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
61.8
66.8
54
low 1920x1080
167.7 175.9 176.3 ~ 173 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
131.1 150.1 154.7 179.1 188 ~ 161 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.1 131.7 137.6 151.9 161 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
131.2 131.7 138.9 147.4 156 157 158.6 246.1 ~ 158 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
91 93.9 97.6 99.1 103 109.2 112.4 175.5 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.6 59.2 91.4 ~ 66 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.4 94.6 102.5 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
130  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
245
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
392 403 483 643 ~ 480 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
201 338 348 479 ~ 342 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156.5 294 308 403 ~ 290 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.4 266 276 347 353 ~ 276 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.8 198.9 209 246 250 ~ 202 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
131.7 138.1 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
107.9 121.8 138.7 144.1 155.8 156.9 173.7 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99.8 110.2 114.7 123.7 136.4 140.1 144.1 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80.7 90.6 101.6 106.6 115.5 116 117.5 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
91.8 108.2 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
195.7 213 217 234 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.7 180.2 183.4 208 221 230 ~ 198 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135.8 144.3 147.8 163.1 167.2 173.1 180.1 181.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107.6 109 119.7 125.2 127 132.4 134.2 139.2 ~ 124 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.1 77.5 78.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
166.9 170.3 209 213 223 228 256 ~ 209 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
153.7 155.7 183.9 186 198.2 199.7 217 ~ 185 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.7 152.7 175.8 185.5 189.3 189.7 215 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134.2 141.1 164.7 171.4 174 174.8 193 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
170.7 173.1 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
ultra 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
185.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
185.4 185.6 186 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
164.5 179 180.2 181 ~ 176 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
124.7 144.8 147.6 149 161 161 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
117.3 123.8 138.8 143 147.3 147.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
83.3
62.5
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.3
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 252041941703520
Doom: The Dark Ages9389797854
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered90804129
Assassin's Creed Shadows867966524232
Civilization 7202195136
Monster Hunter Wilds70.85533.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 21491238661
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle13698957337
Stalker 287756448
Call of Duty Black Ops 6150142107997337
Until Dawn99.385.967.748
Space Marine 290.988.887.773.1
Star Wars Outlaws70.766.555.940.3
F1 242262301026532
Senua's Saga Hellblade 277.25540
Ghost of Tsushima106.510283.860.7
Horizon Forbidden West131.197.59672.6
Dragon's Dogma 28374.8
Helldivers 2143.8141.7141.4101.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357356
Alan Wake 29893885933.6
Counter-Strike 2316265222174.1
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty1701531351237937
Baldur's Gate 317316113815811066
Strange Brigade480342290276202135
X-Plane 11.11143124104100
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark21519816212477
Dota 2 Reborn209185179165172
The Witcher 3154
GTA V185.8186176148136124.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


3
10


10
16

1
14
13

4
11
9
2
8
11
6

7
3
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 14. 20:32:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:36:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12926 +0.014s ... 0.044s

#8 got single benchmarks 12926 +0.027s ... 0.072s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.072s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.703s ... 0.774s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.775s

#12 Got 426 rows for game benchmarks. +0.175s ... 0.95s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.95s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.019s ... 0.969s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.26s ... 1.229s

#16 return log +0.005s ... 1.234s

Notebook reviews with Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop graphics card

RTX 5070 Ti in overdrive: Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 gaming laptop review

RTX 5070 Ti in overdrive: Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 gaming laptop review

Medion's Erazer Major 16 X1 pairs a robust chassis with rock-solid performance driven by the RTX 5070 Ti. In our review, the 16-inch gaming laptop goes head-to-...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.5 kg
The most powerful RTX 5070 Ti gamer so far - Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED review

The most powerful RTX 5070 Ti gamer so far - Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED review

What does it take to make one of last year's standout gaming laptops an even better new model? Maintain the strengths and work on the weaknesses! That's exactly...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
MSI Vector 16 HX AI review: A feature-rich gaming laptop powered by RTX 5070 Ti

MSI Vector 16 HX AI review: A feature-rich gaming laptop powered by RTX 5070 Ti

With the Vector 16 HX AI, MSI delivers a compelling gaming notebook powered by cutting-edge Intel (Arrow Lake) and Nvidia (Blackwell) hardware. However, a close...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
Slim gamer impresses with RTX 5070 Ti laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 in review

Slim gamer impresses with RTX 5070 Ti laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 in review

Even with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU on board, the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 is an excellent gaming and multimedia laptop. However, the price remains quite ...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025, RTX 5070 Ti SKU. Image source: Notebookcheck)

RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU almost as fast as RTX 5080 laptop GPU - Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 review

Asus offers the fastest 14-inch gamer on the market with the ROG Zephyrus G14 2025. We test the variant with the RTX 5070 Ti and 12 GB VRAM, which performs exce...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | 14.00" | 1.6 kg

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » MSI Vector A18 HX A9W laptop review: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the way to go

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » The RTX 5070 Ti Laptop and up to 128 GB RAM inside a gaming/workstation hybrid - XMG Pro 16 (E25) laptop review

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  Review » GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop vs. RTX 5070 Laptop - The successors to the RTX 4070 Laptop in review

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo Legion Pro 5i 16 vs Legion Pro 7i 16: We reviewed both

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is unrivaled since the Razer Blade 14 is limited to the RTX 5070 Laptop

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 4080 Laptop performance for RTX 4070 Laptop money - XMG Pro 16 with the new 5070 Ti Laptop GPU shows strong performance in our review

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo and other laptop makers abuse their control centers by placing ads, as seen on the Legion Pro 5

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

Arc Graphics 3-core (Arrow Lake) *
Arc Graphics 2-core (Arrow Lake) *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01- 5)