Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop is a mobile graphics card from the Blackwell family for laptops, unveiled at CES 2025. It is based on the GB205 chip, featuring 5,888 shader/CUDA cores clocked at 847-1995 MHz (depending on the model) and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with a 192-bit interface. The model also has 46 RT-cores, as well as 80 ROPs.

As a novelty, Blackwell offers support for Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) with DLSS4, thanks to the 5th generation of Tensor cores.

Performance

As our tests show, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is 23% faster than the standard RTX 5070 laptop on average in benchmarks. Gaming performance delta is lower; here, the RTX 5070 Ti laptop is only 15% faster on average than the RTX 5070 laptop. The desktop counterpart, the RTX 5070 Ti, is 34% faster. Furthermore, with the mentioned Multi-Frame Generation (MFG) you can get impressive frame rates, but keep latency in mind.

Power consumption

The GB205 chip is manufactured at TSMC in the 4N (custom 4NP 5nm) process. The maximum allowed TGP for this model is 140 watts (including Dynamic Boost).

GeForce RTX 5000 Laptop GPU Series

GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop compare 10496 @ 0.99 - 1.52 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop compare 8192 @ 0.98 - 2.29 GHz256 Bit @ 28000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 5888 @ 0.85 - 2.22 GHz192 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop compare 4608 @ 0.91 - 2.35 GHz128 Bit @ 32000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop compare 3328 @ 0.95 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 24000 MHz
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop compare 2560 @ 1.02 - 2.66 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameGN22-X7
ArchitectureBlackwell
Pipelines5888 - unified
TMUs184
ROPs64
Raytracing Cores46
Tensor / AI Cores184
Core Speed847 - 2220 (Boost) MHz
AI GPU992 TOPS INT8
CacheL1: 5.8 MB, L2: 48 MB
Memory Speed32000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR7
Max. Amount of Memory12 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth677 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4
Power Consumption115 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Man. Technology5 nm
PCIe5
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1b, DisplayPort 2.1b
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement02.01.2025

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
19.3 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Speed Way Score
min: 4135     avg: 4510     median: 4555 (31%)     max: 4695 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad
min: 3420     avg: 3865     median: 3886 (27%)     max: 4283 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 15665     avg: 17324     median: 17745 (41%)     max: 18593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 28297     avg: 31578     median: 33562 (39%)     max: 33585 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
80235 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 29047     avg: 35413     median: 35552 (54%)     max: 42125 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 36184     avg: 43224     median: 43722 (40%)     max: 47933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
760743 Points (84%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 13812     avg: 16166     median: 16622.5 (43%)     max: 17747 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 14615     avg: 16556     median: 16739.5 (34%)     max: 17981 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
882191 Points (89%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
659227 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 61167     avg: 71074     median: 71744 (68%)     max: 82832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 134306     avg: 165454     median: 154800 (38%)     max: 223650 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
82266 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
182827 Points (70%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 37247     avg: 42923     median: 43731 (53%)     max: 47299 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 49092     avg: 55525     median: 55109 (42%)     max: 61651 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 121273     avg: 122137     median: 122137 (35%)     max: 123001 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 122701     avg: 128541     median: 128540 (70%)     max: 134380 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
68580 Points (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 60964     avg: 65414     median: 65214 (85%)     max: 70064 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
198.1 fps (60%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 24     avg: 26.2     median: 25.7 (4%)     max: 33 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 13     avg: 15.7     median: 16 (6%)     max: 19 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
92.2 fps (23%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
18.5 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
190 fps (33%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
98.6 fps (25%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
188 fps (51%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
29 fps (26%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
90.3 fps (36%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
171 fps (27%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
284 fps (43%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
92.9 fps (25%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
14.1 fps (2%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
91.3 fps (16%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
36.2 fps (6%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
202 fps (23%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
22.6 fps (7%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
152 fps (22%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
92.7 fps (10%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
166 fps (26%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
33.6 fps (4%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
50.8 fps (14%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
503 fps (54%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
26 fps (4%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
85.1 fps (29%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
39.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
76.8 fps (20%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
27.2 fps (3%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
20.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
331 fps (47%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
37.9 fps (8%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
108 fps (48%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
53.5 fps (35%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
115 fps (39%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
24671 points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
236.6 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 164.1     avg: 290.3     median: 316 (18%)     max: 335.41 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
184.7 fps (69%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
403.5 fps (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
960 fps (71%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
859 fps (81%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
983 fps (21%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1084 fps (45%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
3321 fps (26%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 68.3     avg: 878     median: 315 (8%)     max: 1863 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
min: 3.64     avg: 4.7     median: 3.6 (1%)     max: 6.84 fps
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 67235     avg: 151185     median: 155654 (40%)     max: 178141 points
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 21314     avg: 94992     median: 101588 (25%)     max: 166112 points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 7623     avg: 7789     median: 7788.5 (28%)     max: 7954 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 15570     avg: 15671     median: 15671 (27%)     max: 15772 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 40170     avg: 41323     median: 41323 (34%)     max: 42476 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 136.8     avg: 173.3     median: 179.6 (24%)     max: 203 Watt
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170175180185190195200205210215220225230Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
221 Watt (31%)
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110115120125130135140145150155160165170175180185190195200205210215220225230Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
0.7 fps per Watt (58%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 152.7     avg: 215.1     median: 222 (62%)     max: 285 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 144.9     avg: 211.4     median: 222 (28%)     max: 278 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.4258     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (2%)     max: 0.655 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
50.4 dB(A) (72%)
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
88 110.7 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
82.5 102.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.2 90.6 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
70 86.6 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
50 58.8 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
77.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
182 184 214 ~ 193 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
133 141 166 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
104 104 116 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58 62 67 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42 42 46 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
56 58 66 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TAA 1920x1080
182
152
Pragmata

Pragmata

2026
low 1920x1080
184.8 192 ~ 188 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
129.9 146.4 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.5 119.4 ~ 114 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
79.3 86 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.7  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
54  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
96.7 103.2 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Quality Preset + DLSS Balanced + Path Tracing 1920x1080
84.2
78.7
low 1920x1080
118.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
64.7 109.3 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.8 97.2 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9 74.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.8 56.6 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
72  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
123.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.9 93.6 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70.1 89.8 ~ 80 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
66.1 78 ~ 72 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
52.1 60.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
75.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
155.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
93.1 124.7 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
90.9 114.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
60.1 65.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.4 42.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Max Settings + Path Tracing + DLSS Balanced 1920x1080
56.7
low 1920x1080
218 239 257 ~ 238 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
138 188 190 198 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123 147 151 157 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 58 60 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31 34 38 39 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
53 60 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
142.3 149.4 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
99 107.2 107.4 118.8 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.6 78.3 84.4 93.3 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
41.7 42.3 47.4 49 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29.3 30.3 34.2 34.3 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.3  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
30.5  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
48.7 49.9 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
215  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
142.3 155.7 187.4 ~ 162 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
114.5 129.2 144.4 ~ 129 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
79.8 89.5 98.6 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58 64 68.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
96.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
105.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.6 100.5 103.2 ~ 94 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
69.8 82.3 94.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49.9 53.9 58.4 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.4 36.1 37.8 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
160.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
149.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
129.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
97.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
89  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.7 63.3 77.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.8 55.4 64.4 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.1 34.5 44.5 ~ 37 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.4 23.9 31.4 ~ 26 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 25

F1 25

2025
low 1920x1080
127.9 181.7 188.4 220 242 249 260 ~ 210 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
123.2 181.2 184.5 207 217 231 243 ~ 198 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
117 168.3 170.8 171.9 183.3 218 225 ~ 179 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.3 35 35.3 37.6 37.9 42.1 42.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18 20 21.3 22.6 22.6 25 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
8.9  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
20.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
32 36.9 39.3 41.1 41.3 45.9 48.1 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset 16xAF TAA 1920x1080
69.7
64.7
61
85.3
87.3
69.9
73.3
low 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
77.5 94.8 94.9 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.3 84.3 86.1 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
65 82.7 85.4 ~ 78 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
45.7 57.9 59.1 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61 79.1 82.5 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
86.9 94 112.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78.2 81.8 90.8 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40 42.9 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28 30.1 30.9 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
41.9 44.7 47.4 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
81 85 86 89 90 93 94 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76 77 80 83 84 84 89 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63 66 68 70 71 72 77 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47 52 52 52 52 53 55 55 58 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40 41 42 44 44 44 45 47 48 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31 32 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
41 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
49 51 52 54 58 59 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 2560x1440
78
70
84
72
Ultra High + GI + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
56
low 1920x1080
443  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
192.1 212 261 ~ 222 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
187.5 202 213 ~ 201 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
129.1 141.9 144 ~ 138 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1920x1080
93.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.8 84 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56 67.2 70.8 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.8 54.7 55 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.4  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
66.6 70.6 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
189.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
145.2 152.4 153.5 ~ 150 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
118.8 125.2 126.7 ~ 124 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
84.1 88.2 90 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59 62.7 65 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
79.2 86.1 94.7 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126.7 144.4 158.1 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
93.5 102.4 118.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82.2 89.9 101 105.1 107.4 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
63.5 68.4 77.6 80.8 82.5 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.7 43.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
91.1 96 99.9 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Ultra Preset + Full Path Tracing + Quality DLSS + Frame Generation 2560x1440
20.2
Stalker 2

Stalker 2

2024
med. 1920x1080
84.6 89.8 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
73.6 76.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62 65.5 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
46.9 49.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
100.8 104.6 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
138 152 159 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
135 142 150 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
100 100 121 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94 94 97 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65 68 68 89 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37  fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
58  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
99.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
61.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
90.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
73.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
84.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080 cinem.
86.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080 cinem.
70.7 82.3 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080 cinem.
66.5 72.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080 cinem.
55.9 60.3 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440 cinem.
40.3 43.5 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440 cinem.
56.8 59.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
ultra, RT ultra, DLSS, FG RR 2560x1440 cinem.
64.9
low 1280x720 cinem.
84.7
low 1920x1080
126 133 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
94 100 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
73 78 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42 44 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31 33 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
47 49 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
low TSR 100 1280x720
192
cinematic RT: Very High DLSS 68 FG 2560x1440
59
54
F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
247 322 324 ~ 298 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
226 236 268 315 318 350 ~ 286 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
217 223 232 250 261 268 270 291 ~ 252 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.2 93 97.7 98.7 101.4 106.4 107.6 108 110.6 114.8 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.2 60.4 62.8 66.4 66.5 68.5 69.4 71.2 72 72.1 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.1 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
38.6 61.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
78.1 88.5 94.1 98.4 99 102.5 106 112.4 115.8 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD FSR 2560x1440
113.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
77.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
59.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
106.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
83.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
131.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
97.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
93.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
74.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
143.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
101.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
358  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
357  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
356  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
183
low 1920x1080
93.2 93.2 108.9 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2 88.3 103.5 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.5 81.7 95.8 96 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.5 54.6 63.9 64.5 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing 3840x2160
13.1
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
22.9
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 2x 3840x2160
39.8
High Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 4x 3840x2160
72.4
low 1920x1080
521.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
317.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
200.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
161.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
127.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
641.8
med. 1920x1080
316  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
265  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
222  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
174.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
130.4 131.6 147.3 149.4 150.4 161.7 171.3 175.1 183.7 188.6 203 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
126.8 127.3 127.4 134.4 135.9 138.5 139.8 142.4 146.5 156.8 164.6 166.9 169.2 178.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112 114.7 115.9 117 119.7 124.5 126.1 126.4 133.9 135.4 138 140.6 143.2 144.6 154.1 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
100.8 104.9 105.1 105.4 107.6 111.9 114.9 115.7 119.6 124.1 126.7 128 129 129.9 132.4 135.5 ~ 118 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.4 71.7 72.7 75 75.1 77.4 80.8 81 81.6 82.6 82.9 84.3 87.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.9 37.1 37.3 128.8 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K DLSS 3840x2160
127.2  fps    + Compare
4K FSR 3840x2160
33.6  fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
81.5 83.6 84.8 86.9 88.5 91.2 91.6 93.9 94.2 96.1 102.1 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
206
157
183.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
60.7
52.5
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset + DLSS3 Quality + FG 3840x2160
57.4
Ultra Preset (FSR2 on) 1920x1080
157.7
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off, no Path Tracing) 3840x2160
17.7
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
104.9
122.6
104.9
99.1
110.5
120.5
116.2
113.2
103.9
68
116.2
95.6
101.6
105
105.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset (no DLSS, no FG) 3840x2160
3.7
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality (no FG) 3840x2160
19.4
19.9
18.9
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation (M)FG 2x 3840x2160
34
35.8
31
Ray Tracing Overdrive Preset + DLSS 4 Transformer Quality + Frame Generation MFG 4x 3840x2160
61.8
66.8
54
low 1920x1080
156 167.7 175.8 175.9 176.3 196.8 202.6 221 ~ 184 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
129.1 131.1 144 146.1 147.9 150.1 154.7 166.8 172.8 178.7 179.1 181.6 188 ~ 159 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
108.1 111.1 128.3 129.8 130 131.7 137.6 145.4 151.9 154.2 157.5 161 162.4 ~ 139 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
108.3 122.8 125.2 127 131.2 131.7 138.9 141.9 147.4 153.9 155.6 156 157 158.6 159.3 246.1 ~ 148 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
91 91.4 93.9 97.6 99.1 103 108.6 109.2 109.5 110.5 112.4 120 175.5 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.6 52.5 59.2 91.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K DLSS 3840x2160
72.4 86.4 94.6 102.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
QHD DLSS 2560x1440
128.4 130 157.7 ~ 139 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset SMAA 1280x720
245
233
173
270
216
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
170.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
150.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
136  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
135.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
116.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
164.6
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
102.4
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
182.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
164.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
133.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
392 403 422 438 483 514 572 579 585 643 ~ 503 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
201 324 328 335 337 338 348 362 464 468 479 ~ 362 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
156.5 281 294 301 305 308 328 330 381 387 403 ~ 316 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.4 266 274 276 279 295 303 314 337 340 347 353 ~ 293 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.8 198.9 201 209 209 210 228 229 236 246 250 ~ 211 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
113.5 131.7 138.1 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
174  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
155  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
170
low 1280x720
107.9 121.8 122 132.7 138.7 144.1 154.1 155.1 155.8 155.8 156.9 165 173.7 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
93.9 99.8 110.2 112.3 113.8 114.7 123.7 123.9 135.3 136.4 137.3 140.1 142.2 144.1 145.4 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.3 80.7 90.6 92.5 101.6 104.5 105.6 106.6 109.4 110.4 115.5 116 117.5 118.3 124.6 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
75.5 91.8 108.2 ~ 92 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
117.4 195.7 213 217 219 223 231 232 233 234 ~ 212 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115.6 123.2 164.7 180.2 183.4 195.8 197.6 208 209 211 216 221 230 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
108.9 111.3 135.8 144.3 147.8 151 156.8 158.2 161.1 163.1 166 167.2 173.1 180.1 181.4 ~ 154 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
103.9 107.6 109 119.6 119.7 120.3 121.8 125.2 126.2 127 129.5 132.4 134.2 139.2 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
74.1 77.5 78.8 ~ 77 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
160.8 166.9 170.3 183.9 209 213 223 223 228 236 256 259 263 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
130.8 137.5 153.7 155.7 166.5 183.9 186 192.9 198.2 199.7 199.9 207 217 222 240 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
122.3 133.1 145.7 152.7 159.2 175.8 178.8 185.5 189.3 189.7 192.5 199.9 209 213 215 ~ 177 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115.5 123.6 134.2 141.1 150.1 164.7 165.4 171.4 174 174.8 176.4 184.7 188.4 193 193.9 ~ 163 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
120.1 170.7 173.1 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
686  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
517  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
341  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
154 176.2 ~ 165 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
130  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
394
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
152 185.8 187.6 187.6 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
162.5 167.8 185.4 185.6 186 186.6 187.2 187.6 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147.3 153.8 164.5 179 180.2 181 182.8 184.7 184.9 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98 102.7 124.7 144.8 147 147.6 148.2 149 152.9 159.2 161 161 164.6 166.3 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
98.9 117.3 123.8 133.1 134.4 138.8 139.1 143 147.3 147.3 151.4 157.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
124.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
83.3
62.5
71
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
184.1
187.2
157.5
187.1
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.3
187.9
171.2
187.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
007 First Light9992827854
Forza Horizon 6193147108624325
Pragmata1881381148347.7
Death Stranding 2118.987806250
Crimson Desert123.683807256
Resident Evil Requiem155.81091036341
Call of Duty Black Ops 72381791455436
Anno 117: Pax Romana14610883453219.3
ARC Raiders2151621298963
The Outer Worlds 2105.694825436
Battlefield 6160.7149.2129.497.168.1
Borderlands 492.965573726
F1 2521019817938228.92
Doom: The Dark Ages9389797854
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered11698844230
Assassin's Creed Shadows888270534432
Civilization 7443222201138
Monster Hunter Wilds93.17463.2655333.4
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2189.31501248762
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle143105977537
Stalker 287756448
Call of Duty Black Ops 6150142107997337
Until Dawn99.385.967.748
Space Marine 290.988.887.773.1
Star Wars Outlaws86.877695842
Black Myth: Wukong13097764332
F1 242982862521036632
Senua's Saga Hellblade 277.25540
Ghost of Tsushima106.510283.860.7
Horizon Forbidden West131.197.59672.6
Dragon's Dogma 28374.8
Helldivers 2143.8141.7141.4101.6
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown358358357356
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora126114987447
Alan Wake 29893885933.6
Total War Pharaoh521.4317.1200.2161.4127.4
Counter-Strike 2316265222174.1
Cyberpunk 20771631471301187960
Baldur's Gate 318415913914810962
Far Cry 6170.9150.2136135.7116.7
Anno 1800182.4164.8133.586.476.6
Strange Brigade503362316293211128
Far Cry 5174155145142144
X-Plane 11.1114512510592
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark21218915412377
Dota 2 Reborn215186177163155
The Witcher 3686517341165130
GTA V178181173145136124.2
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


10
28


20
26

2
25
21

9
21
11
2
19
16
9
3
7
4
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Amazon Logo
  • $1,999.99
    Acer Nitro 16S AI Copilot+ PC Gaming Laptop | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Processor | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU | 16" WQXGA IPS 180Hz Display | 32GB DDR5 | 2TB Gen 4 SSD | Wi-Fi 6E | AN16S-61-R5K4
  • $2,107.91
    ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 16” ROG Nebula Display 16:10 2.5K 240Hz/3ms, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070 Ti GPU, Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 275HX Processor, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, Wi-Fi 7, Win11 Home
  • $2,199.00
    ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) Gaming Laptop, 16” ROG Nebula 16:10 2.5K 240Hz/3ms, NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 5070 Ti, AMD Ryzen™ 9 9955HX3D Processor, 32GB DDR5-5600, 1TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD, Wi-Fi 6E, Win 11 Home
  • $1,929.00
    msi Vector 16 HX AI Gaming Laptop, 16" QHD+ IPS 240Hz,AMD Ryzen 9-8940HX Processor, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, RGB Backlit, w/Mouse pad (Win 11, 16GB RAM | 1TB PCIe SSD)
  • $2,269.00
    ASUS ROG Strix G16 16" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 12GB GDDR7, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, 16GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, Backlit Keyboard, Win 11 Pro, Gray, 1TB Docking Station Set

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 17. 11:15:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:30:27 +0200 +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12926 +0.036s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 12926 +0.055s ... 0.113s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +2.75s ... 2.863s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 2.863s

#12 Got 964 rows for game benchmarks. +0.317s ... 3.18s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 3.18s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.03s ... 3.21s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.84s ... 4.05s

#16 return log +0.612s ... 4.662s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop graphics card

Alienware 16X Aurora 2026 review: Newer features for a bigger price

Alienware 16X Aurora 2026 review: Newer features for a bigger price

The 16X Aurora can now be configured with more fancy features like OLED and the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. However, be prepared to pay upwards of $3000 for this midrange gaming laptop in the process.
Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.6 kg
Gaming without compromise? Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro with large display reviewed

Gaming without compromise? Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro with large display reviewed

Despite its relatively slim design, the Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro is among the largest gaming laptops on the market. We tested a configuration equipped with a Core 7 240H and a GeForce RTX 5070 Ti to see how it stacks up against the competition. Can Gigabyte’s contender hold its own?
Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 18", 2.9 kg
Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro on the desk

Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro review: RTX 5070 Ti meets a slim chassis and some unusual priorities

With a Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti, and a bright 165 Hz display, the A16 Pro looks like a typical midrange-to-high-end gaming laptop on paper. But despite the gaming label, this 23 mm thin notebook seems to target a different audience.
Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.4 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, RTX 5070 Ti and mini LED - XMG Apex 16 Max gaming laptop review

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, RTX 5070 Ti and mini LED - XMG Apex 16 Max gaming laptop review

With the Apex 16 Max, XMG offers a gaming laptop featuring the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, a fast AMD Fire Range HX processor, and a 300 Hz Mini-LED panel. While gaming performance is excellent, battery life is unfortunately very limited.
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.7 kg
Shooting star or flop? Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI gaming laptop review

Shooting star or flop? Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI gaming laptop review

With the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI, Acer is selling a fairly thin gaming notebook with an OLED display, Core Ultra 9 275HX and GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. Discover in our review whether the 16-inch model surpasses its competitors or if it's more likely to bite its teeth out.
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 16", 2.2 kg

Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » The cheapest Nvidia RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU - XMG Focus 17 M25 gaming laptop review

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Gaming notebook with Ryzen 9 9955HX and RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU - Chuwi Gamebook review

Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti in overdrive: Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 gaming laptop review

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » The most powerful RTX 5070 Ti gamer so far - Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10H OLED review

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI review: A feature-rich gaming laptop powered by RTX 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  Review » Slim gamer impresses with RTX 5070 Ti laptop - Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 in review

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU almost as fast as RTX 5080 laptop GPU - Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 review

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
  Review » MSI Vector A18 HX A9W laptop review: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the way to go

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » The RTX 5070 Ti Laptop and up to 128 GB RAM inside a gaming/workstation hybrid - XMG Pro 16 (E25) laptop review

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25) Engineering Sample: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  Review » GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop vs. RTX 5070 Laptop - The successors to the RTX 4070 Laptop in review

Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GU405AR

Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro: Intel Core 7 240H, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro

Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Major 16 X1 MD62736

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR, Core 7 255HX: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR, Core 7 255HX

MSI Vector A16 HX A8W: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector A16 HX A8W

Razer Blade 16 2025, RTX 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 2025, RTX 5070 Ti

HP Omen Max 16-ah0000: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Max 16-ah0000

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI PHN16-73

Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G815LR

Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Alienware 16 Area-51, RTX 5070 Ti

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CR

Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G615LR

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG, Ultra 9 275HX

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G614FR

MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 18.00", 2.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth A18 AI+ A3XWHG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403WR

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG

Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 18.00", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72

Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus: Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » 2026 Alienware 16X Aurora is so expensive it now rivals the Area-51 series in price

   » Why gaming on Balanced mode instead of Performance is worthwhile on the Alienware 16X Aurora

   » Alienware 16X Aurora finally shipping with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, but configurations can be frustrating

Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti): Intel Core 7 240H, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » RTX 5070 out, RTX 5070 Ti in – and suddenly the Gigabyte A16 becomes the A16 Pro

   » Thin, efficient, long-lasting, and affordable – the Gigabyte A16 Pro surprises in review

   » This “pro” laptop has a problem: Gigabyte A16 Pro in a reality check

Schenker XMG APEX 16 MAX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
   » XMG Apex 16 Max vs. XMG Pro 16 - RTX 5070 Ti better with AMD or Intel?

   » XMG's Apex 16 Max with the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is fully focused on gaming performance

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » RTX 5070 Ti gaming laptop for cheap: MSI Vector A16 HX gets big 35% price drop

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » More for less: how much performance do you really lose with the Ultra 7 instead of the Ultra 9 in Lenovo’s Legion Pro?

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 with RTX 5070 Ti and OLED display gets $400 price cut

MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Discounted MSI Vector 16 HX AI with free AAA games: RTX 5070 Ti-powered gaming laptop is now $250 off

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2025) with RTX 5070 Ti, Ryzen AI 9 HX and 3K OLED hits lowest price yet

Schenker XMG Focus 17 M25: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » XMG's Focus 17 M25 with the RTX 5070 Ti is currently the best value gaming laptop

Chuwi Gamebook, R9 9955HX: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » Chuwi ventures into gaming - powerful notebook with AMD Ryzen 9 and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti laptop GPU reviewed

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 Gen 10 with RTX 5070, Core Ultra 7 and 2.5K OLED gets huge 38% discount

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Asus ROG Zephyrus G14: OLED gaming laptop with RTX 5070 Ti has never been cheaper

MSI Vector A18 HX A9W: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, 18.00", 3.5 kg
   » These are the slowest and fastest laptops with GeForce RTX 5070 graphics currently available

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo Legion Pro 5i 16 vs Legion Pro 7i 16: We reviewed both

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 5070 Ti: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » Verdict on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16: Powerful, but still slower than its smaller G14 sibling

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 5070 Ti: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 14.00", 1.6 kg
   » The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 is unrivaled since the Razer Blade 14 is limited to the RTX 5070 Laptop

Schenker XMG Pro 16 (E25): Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
   » RTX 4080 Laptop performance for RTX 4070 Laptop money - XMG Pro 16 with the new 5070 Ti Laptop GPU shows strong performance in our review

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Lenovo and other laptop makers abuse their control centers by placing ads, as seen on the Legion Pro 5

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

M5 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

M4 9-Core GPU *
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)